Stochastic Calculus Beyond Brownian Motion: Jumps and Itô Formulae
Summary
The question asks how stochastic calculus changes when a process is not driven by normally distributed Brownian increments. It proposes extending Itô’s formula by adding terms for higher power variations, associated with higher cumulants of an infinitely divisible process. The reply cautions that this formulation is not generally the right starting point and recommends first decomposing the process and considering a measure change or localization so that a martingale framework can be used.
The answer identifies jumps and fractional Brownian motion as cases requiring specialized Itô-like formulae. For jump processes of Lévy type, it points to semimartingale calculus; fractional Brownian motion also has its own adapted calculus. The exchange gives broad conceptual guidance and references foundational treatments, but does not derive the proposed higher-variation formula or specify the conditions under which each framework applies. It highlights the importance of the process structure before choosing a stochastic calculus.
Key ideas
- Brownian Itô calculus relies on particular martingale and quadratic-variation structure.
- Measure changes and localization can help place a process within a tractable martingale framework.
- Jump processes require semimartingale versions of Itô’s formula.
- Fractional Brownian motion has a separate Itô-like theory.
- The document does not validate the proposed infinite series formula for higher power variations.
Tags
Full text
# How to measure a non-normal stochastic process?
# How to measure a non-normal stochastic process?
If I understand right, Itô's lemma tells us that for any process $X$ that can be adapted to an underlying standard normal Wiener measure $\mathrm dB_t$, and any twice continuously differentiable function $f$, $$\mathrm df(X_t) = f'(X_t)\mathrm dX_t + \frac 1 2 f''(X_t)\mathrm d[X_t] ,$$ where $$[X_t]=\lim_{\|\Pi\|\rightarrow0}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(X_{t_i}-X_{t_{i-1}}\right)^2,$$ $0=t_0 < \cdots < t_n=t$, and $\|\Pi\|=\max_{1\le k\le n}|t_k-t_{k-1}|$, is the quadratic variation. We are allowed to ignore all higher power variations because all cumulants higher than the second vanish for the normal distribution. But the additivity of cumulants under convolution leads us naturally to consider a stochastic process based on an arbitrary distribution subject only to the requirements that it be infinitely divisible and possess a moment-generating function. So if we let $A_t$ be the constant-linear-drift+martingale process having such a distribution, and we define the higher power variations $$[A_t]_n=\lim_{\|\Pi\|\rightarrow0}\sum_{i=1}^{n}\left(A_{t_i}-A_{t_{i-1}}\right)^n,$$ then these all exist and are equal to the corresponding cumulants of the distribution of $A_t$. This complicates Itô's lemma, which, again if I understand right, must now be written: $$\mathrm df(X_t) = f'(X_t)\mathrm dX_t + \sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac 1{n!} f^{(n)}(X_t)\mathrm d[X_t]_n ,$$ but this is not so bad, because all these higher power variations converge in probability and scale linearly with time, except that now we need $f$ to be infinitely differentiable. So, starting off from here, what are the most important consequences to stochastic calculus of refusing to assume that a process can be adapted to a measure based on a normal distribution?
## Answer by lehalle (score 4)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/3707
The standard method to manage your kind of problem (i.e. dealing with stochastic processes that are note presented or built thanks to a Brownian motion) is to use a measure change.
The power of Brownian motion is that you have a lot of representation theorems (Doob-Meyer theorem, Wold theorem, etc) that allows to (thanks to a change of measure or a localization method), provides you a way to define a space in which your process (or the residual of your process once you removed easy to deal with components) behaves like a martingale. So you can use Itô on it.
The only effects that can change the Itô formula should be:
- jumps (but you have an Itô semi-martingale formula as far as the Jumps are of Lévy-type, see for instance Jacod-Shiryaev or Cont-Tankov)
- fractional Brownian motion (but here again you have an Itô-like formula, see form instance Stochastic Calculus for Fractional Brownian Motion, I. Theory, by Duncan)
For others you should first think about the proper cleaning of the process and change of measure before doing something fancy I think.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.