Straddle Payoff Variance and the Put-Call Covariance
Summary
The document explains how to combine the payoff moments of a European call and put with the same strike and expiry to obtain the variance of a straddle. Because the call and put payoffs cannot both be positive at expiry, their product is zero in every state. This gives a covariance equal to the negative product of their expected payoffs, so straddle variance is the sum of the individual variances minus twice that product.
It rejects the shortcut of subtracting twice the product of the standard deviations, which would assume perfect negative correlation. The answer assumes discounted terminal payoffs under the stated pricing setup. The document supplies formulas for the separate option moments but does not provide numerical results or explore other payoff conventions, exercise styles, or dependence structures.
Key ideas
- A straddle payoff is the sum of a call and put payoff at the same strike and expiry.
- At expiry, the call and put payoffs cannot both be positive, so their product is zero.
- The covariance of the two payoffs is the negative product of their expected values.
- Straddle variance equals the sum of the separate variances minus twice the product of the expected payoffs.
- Subtracting twice the product of standard deviations incorrectly assumes perfect negative correlation.
Tags
Full text
# Variance of a straddle (Black Scholes)
# Variance of a straddle (Black Scholes)
I am trying to determine the variance of the payout of a straddle. For puts and calls individually:
```
Var[P] = E[P^2] - E[P]^2
Var[C] = E[C^2] - E[C]^2
```
where: $$ E[P] \text = e^{-r T}\int _0{}^k\frac{(k-S) }{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS $$
$$ E[C] \text = e^{-r T}\int _k{}^{\infty}\frac{(S-k) }{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS $$ $$ E[P^2] \text = e^{-2r T}\int _0{}^k\frac{(k-S)^2 }{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS $$
$$ E[C^2] \text = e^{-2r T}\int _k{}^{\infty}\frac{(S-k)^2}{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS $$ Where: $$ a=T \left(r-\frac{\sigma ^2}{2}\right)+\log \left(S_0\right) $$ and $$ b=\sigma \sqrt{T} $$
These results become:
$$ E[P] = k \Phi \left(-d_2\right) e^{-r T}-S_0 \Phi \left(-d_1\right) $$ $$ E[C] = S_0 \Phi \left(d_1\right)-k \Phi \left(d_2\right) e^{-r T} $$ $$ E[P^2] = k^2 \Phi \left(-d_2\right) e^{-2 r T}-2 k S_0 \Phi \left(-d_1\right) e^{-r T}+S_0^2 \Phi \left(d_2-2 d_1\right) e^{\sigma ^2 T} $$ $$ E[C^2] = k^2 \Phi \left(d_2\right) e^{-2 r T}-2 k S_0 \Phi \left(d_1\right) e^{-r T}+S_0^2 \Phi \left(2 d_1-d_2\right) e^{\sigma ^2 T} $$
Note that $$ d_1=\frac{-\log (k)+T \left(r-\frac{\sigma ^2}{2}\right)+\log \left(S_0\right)+\sigma ^2 T}{\sigma \sqrt{T}} $$ and $$ d_2=d_1-\sigma \sqrt{T} $$
where:
```
S0 = initial price
S = price
k = strike
r = interest rate
T = time to expiration
sigma = implied volatility
Phi = standard normal variable
```
These results are also shown in this paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1204.3452.pdf
My question: how to combine Var[P] and Var[C] to get Var[straddle]?
Since C and P are negatively correlated(right?), can we use this? $$ Var[straddle] = Var[P] + Var[C] - 2\sqrt{Var[P] Var[C] } $$
This seems alright, I'm not sure. If we instead start with the payoff for the straddle as a piecewise function: $$ payoff_{straddle} = \begin{array}{cc} \{ & \begin{array}{cc} k-S & 0<S<k \\ S-k & S\geq k \\ \end{array} \\ \end{array} $$
then: $$ E[straddle] \text = e^{-r T}\int _0{}^{\infty}\frac{payoff_{straddle} }{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS $$
But, after separating out the different pieces in the piecewise function, this becomes $$ E[straddle] \text = e^{-r T}(\int _0{}^k\frac{(k-S) }{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS +\int _k{}^{\infty}\frac{(S-k) }{\sqrt{2 \pi } b S} e^{-\frac{(\log (S)-a)^2}{2 b^2}}dS) $$ which is simply $$ E[straddle] = E[C] + E[P] $$ and, similarly $$ E[straddle^2] =E[C^2] + E[P^2] $$ Var[straddle] would then be: $$ Var[straddle] = E[straddle^2] - E[straddle]^2 = E[C^2] + E[P^2] - E[P]^2 - E[C]^2 - 2E[C]E[P] $$ $$ Var[straddle] = Var[C] + Var[P] - 2 E[C]E[P] $$
The second approach seems more robust to me, since we are beginning with payoff for the position and building from there. Perhaps I am missing something though.Thoughts on correct method?
## Answer by Gordon (score 1, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/30161
Assuming that \begin{align*} C &= e^{-rT}(S-K)^+,\\ P &= e^{-rT}(K-S)^+, \end{align*} and \begin{align*} straddle = C+ P, \end{align*} then the formula \begin{align*} Var[straddle] = Var[C] + Var[P] - 2 E[C]E[P] \end{align*} is correct. However, the formula \begin{align*} Var[straddle] = Var[P] + Var[C] - 2\sqrt{Var[P] Var[C] } \end{align*} is wrong, as $C$ and $P$ are not perfectly negatively corrected. Specifically, since $CP=0$, \begin{align*} Covar(C, P) &= -E(C)E(P)\\ &\neq -\sqrt{Var[P] Var[C] }. \end{align*}Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.