Strategies That Held Up During the 2008 Financial Crisis
Summary
The document surveys quantitative and systematic approaches reported to have performed well during the 2008 crisis. It identifies managed futures, especially trend following in futures markets, as a major systematic category that did well. It also discusses short-bias funds, which maintain net short equity exposure, and short-term systematic traders, including high-frequency firms. Global macro managers are mentioned as another group with strong crisis performance, though the answer says they do not form a single coherent or necessarily quantitative strategy category.
A second answer describes tail-risk investing: estimating downside outcomes under different conditions, using long-run equity data and valuation measures such as the Q ratio to study the left tail of future returns. The evidence cited is fund rankings and examples, plus a referenced research paper; the document does not provide audited comparisons or explain each fund’s trading rules. It cautions that many crisis winners did not perform as well afterward and frames some approaches as hedges against severe declines rather than consistent absolute-return strategies. Historical crisis performance alone does not establish future robustness.
Key ideas
- Managed futures and trend following were identified as prominent systematic crisis winners.
- Short-bias funds benefited from maintaining net short equity exposure.
- Short-term systematic and high-frequency traders are also cited as having performed well.
- Tail-risk analysis can use long-run equity data and valuation conditions to estimate downside outcomes.
- Strong crisis performance may not persist, and some strategies function more as hedges than steady return sources.
Tags
Full text
# What quantitative strategies were successful through the 2008 crisis? # What quantitative strategies were successful through the 2008 crisis? Obviously, strategies like "short everything" did well during this period, but getting the future right is one thing and having a robust strategy is another. In particular, many quantitative strategies rely on a lot of statistical and historical assumptions. The line usually goes "well of course they're wrong but they work". But during 2008, many did not. What quantitative strategies and approaches were successful through 2008, and why? ## Answer by Shane (score 6) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/2698 One simple way to approach this question is to look at what quantitative hedge funds did well during the crisis, and try to understand what strategies they employed. As an example, you can look at the Barron's 100 from 2009. The top performing fund was RenTech's Medallion. Their strategy is not publicly known. There were only two broad hedge fund strategies that did well: short-bias and managed futures. Many Global Macro firms also performed well (e.g. Soros), although they are less coherent as a category (and are typically not strictly quant). Short-bias did well because this category must stay net short equities; as a category, this isn't primarily associated with quantitative strategies. Managed futures is the largest systematic category that performed very well during the crisis. This strategy is associated with trend following in the futures markets. You can see many of the largest managed futures funds in the Barron's list, including BlueCrest, Graham, and Two Sigma. Another category that performed quite well during the crisis is short-term systematic traders, including high-frequency traders. There are several examples in the Barron's 100 as well, such as QIM and Roy Niederhoffer (also have a look at the performance of the "Short-Term Traders Index"). Most of these general categories have not performed as well since the crisis, which is why they are often viewed as hedges (insurance) more than absolute return funds. ## Answer by JDrama (score 4) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/2725 There are hedge funds out there that actually only make money when markets go down a lot. I think the strategies they use are what you are looking for and i must tell you i found it very interesting. There is this hedge fund called Universa, its run by Mark Spitznagel and advised by Nasim Tallib the writer of the book "the Black Swan". This hedge fund profits out of black swan events like the 2008 crash where he made a 100% return. Spitznagel looks at the probability of the market falling for a certain percentage under several conditions, in his latest paper he looked at the Q ratio. what he did is he looked at the Q-ratio of the S&P500 companies in the last 110 years and for specific ranges of Q-ratios he looked at the left tail of the distribution of returns. he concluded the paper with a median and 20th percentile (99% conf. int.) return drawback of the S&P500 for the next three years. Here is the paper: http://www.universa.net/UniversaSpitznagel_research_20110613.pdf
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.