Skip to content
All library documents

Stylized Facts of Intraday Financial Returns

Article Quant Q&A · Author: emcor

Summary

The document gives a brief overview of empirical patterns reported in financial returns, particularly in response to a question about intraday equity and exchange-rate data. It notes that return distributions and volatility change over time, returns are roughly symmetric but become more heavy-tailed at finer sampling frequencies, and longer-horizon returns tend to look more Gaussian. It also mentions serial-correlation anomalies and empirical scaling behavior, while cautioning that these patterns do not make returns straightforward to forecast.

The discussion points readers toward research on asset-return properties and volatility clustering, but it does not present datasets, detailed methods, or evidence from a specific market or sampling interval. The claims are therefore a compact literature-oriented starting point rather than a complete account of intraday behavior. Results may vary with the asset, frequency, and statistical treatment.

Key ideas

  • Return distributions and return volatility are not constant over time.
  • Returns are approximately symmetric, with heavier tails reported at finer sampling frequencies.
  • Returns appear more Gaussian when measured over longer horizons.
  • Serial-correlation anomalies may exist, but the answer describes them as difficult to forecast.
  • Empirical scaling patterns exist even though returns are not independent and identically distributed.

Tags

Full text
# Intraday Data - Stylized Facts?


# Intraday Data - Stylized Facts?












Can someone give an overview or literature on Intraday Data Stylized Facts?

In particular for equity market returns or exchange rates.

## Answer by madilyn (score 2)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/14898

- Stationarity. The distribution of returns is non-stationary. Moreover, standard deviation of returns is not constant over time.

- Symmetry. The distribution of returns is approximately symmetric with increasing leptokurtosis as sampling frequency increases. However, large drawdowns are not matched with equally large upward movements.

- Gaussian behavior. Returns become increasingly normal with decreasing frequency. Long horizon returns are approximately normal

- Serial correlation. There exist anomalies in the serial correlation of returns, which are nevertheless impossibly difficult to forecast.

- Scaling properties and asymmetry in time scale. Time scaling is nontrivial as returns are not iid, but there is documented evidence for fairly stable, empirical scaling properties.

## Answer by SiXUlm (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/14936

This reminds me of a paper by Rama Cont: "Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues.". You can download here:

http://www.cmap.polytechnique.fr/~rama/papers/empirical.pdf

He also has a paper on volatility clustering: "Volatility clustering in financial markets: empirical facts and agent-based models.", which may be of your interest.

http://www.cmap.polytechnique.fr/~rama/papers/clustering.pdf

Hope this help.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.