Testing Average Abnormal Returns in an Event Study
Summary
The document explains how to test whether an event day produced abnormal stock returns across a group of companies. It uses a market model fitted over an estimation window, then defines the daily average abnormal return as the cross-sectional mean across the securities being studied.
To estimate the standard error for that average, the answer calculates daily cross-sectional average abnormal returns across the estimation period and takes their sample standard deviation, using the period’s degrees of freedom. This single estimate is then used as the denominator for the test statistic on each event-window day. The response clarifies that model-based expected returns may be estimated in-sample during the estimation window. Its setup assumes the stated event-window arrangement and does not discuss adjustments for cross-sectional dependence, overlapping events, or alternative event-study variance estimators.
Key ideas
- The event-day numerator is the cross-sectional average abnormal return across the securities.
Tags
Full text
# Test statistic of event study
# Test statistic of event study
Following the event study paper USING DAILY STOCK RETURNS The Case of Event Studies
let us suppose that I have daily stock returns for 50 companies from the date 2012-01-01 until 2014-01-01. and I want to exmine the effect of a single day event (i.e. some announcement on 2013-02-01) and I use 250 day range as training set of the regression model which will be used to estimate the abnormal returns.
Therefore we get;
$Estimation\ Window\ [T_1,T_2] \ = \ 250 \ days$
$Evemt \ Window \ [t_1 , t_2] = 20 \ days$
where:
$t_1 = (T_2+1) \ and \ Event \ Date = t_0$
According to the attachet paper;
OLS market model
$A_{i,t} \ = R_{i,t} \ - \ \hat\alpha_i \ - \ \hat\beta_i R_{m,t'}$
where
$A_{i,t}$ as the excess return for security $i$ at day $t$. (abnormal returns)
$R_{i,t}$ designate the observed arithmetic return for security $i$ at day $t$.
Now, I want to test the statistical significance of the event date $t_0$. The null hypothesis is that the event day $t_0$ has no abnormal returns or $A_{i,t_0} \ = \ 0$. According to the paper, the test statistic for any event day $t$ is $\bar A_t/\hat S(\bar A_t)$.
Question
How to Calculate the test statistic in my case?
If I understand it rightly, I have to take the mean of the abnormal returns for the 50 companes at $t_0$ as the numerator. for example: $\bar A_{t} \ = \ \frac{1}{N_t}\sum_{i=1}^{n_t}A_{i,t'} $ where $N_t \ = \ 50 \ and \ t \ = \ t_0$
but how to calculate the $\hat S(\bar A_t)$ part?
Should I use the OLS regression model that I trained on the dataset $[T_1,T_2]$ to perform in-sample prediction on the same set $[T_1,T_2]$ then calculate the mean of predicted returns of 50 companies $(\bar A_t)$ for every $t$, then calculate the overall mean $(\bar{\bar A})$ and as a result;
$\hat S(\bar A_t) \ = \ \sqrt{\bigg(\sum_{t=1}^{t=250}(\bar A_t \ - \ \bar{\bar A})^2\bigg)/249} $
or I just have to take the standard deviation of the normal returns for the $[T_1,T_2]$ dataset?
Would appreciate your help.
## Answer by skoestlmeier (score 1, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/50695
> If I understand it rightly, I have to take the mean of the abnormal returns for the 50 companes at $t_0$ as the numerator. for example: $\bar A_{t} \ = \ \frac{1}{N_t}\sum_{i=1}^{n_t}A_{i,t'} $ where $N_t \ = \ 50 \ and \ t \ = \ t_0$
That's absolutely right. $\bar{A_{t}}$ is the cross-sectional average of abnormal returns on day $t$.
> But how to calculate the $\hat S(\bar A_t)$ part?
I may not understand your stated explanation, but the equation on p. 7 is quite straightforward. I assume you are using 250 days for the estimation period and 20 additional days for the event period; the latter equally distributed around the event day $t_0$:
- Calculate the above $\bar{A_{t}}$ for each of your 270 points in time, i.e. for the 250 days in the estimation period $[t_{-250};t_{-11}]$ and the 21 days of the event period $[t_{-10};t_{+10}]$. If using the OLS market model then yes, the expected return calculation would be an in-sample estimation.
- Calculate the mean of $\bar{A_{t}}$, i.e. $\bar{\bar{A}}$ for the interval $[t_{-250};t_{-11}]$, i.e. the average of the daily abnormal return during the estimation period.
- $\hat S(\bar A_t)$ is calculated as the standard deviation of $\bar{A_{t}}$ during the estimation period $[t_{-250};t_{-11}]$. For an unbiased estimator, you are right to use the value of 249 in the denominator.
- Step (2) and (3) both refer to the estimation period $[T_1,T_2]$. The final test statistic is the ratio of of $\bar{A_t}$ for each $t$ of the event window (i.e.$[t_1,t_2]$) and the constant value of $\hat S(\bar A_t)$ from step (3).Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.