Skip to content
All library documents

The One-Half Term in Fourier Inversion for Option Exercise Probabilities

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user60799

Summary

The document explains the one-half term that appears when using Fourier methods to calculate the risk-neutral probability that a log asset price exceeds an option strike threshold. It relates the probability of exceeding the threshold to one minus the cumulative distribution function evaluated there. Fourier inversion for the cumulative distribution contributes a one-half term and an integral involving the characteristic function; taking the complement changes the integral’s sign and leaves the one-half term positive.

The answer presents this as an application of the Fourier inversion formula for a CDF, then applies the formula to the exercise event. It clarifies that the transform in the pricing expression is the characteristic function. The explanation points to a fuller derivation elsewhere but does not discuss numerical integration, convergence conditions, or distributional edge cases such as probability mass at the threshold, which may matter when applying inversion formulas.

Key ideas

  • Fourier inversion expresses a CDF using its characteristic function and includes a one-half term.
  • The probability of exceeding a threshold is the complement of the CDF at that threshold.
  • Taking that complement produces the positive one-half term in the exercise probability expression.
  • The Fourier transform used in the pricing expression is interpreted as a characteristic function.
  • The derivation does not cover numerical implementation or all distributional edge cases.

Tags

Full text
# Where does 1/2 in Fourier Transform method of pricing options come from?


# Where does 1/2 in Fourier Transform method of pricing options come from?












I am reading Jianwe Zhu's Applications of Fourier Transform to Smile Modeling. On page 26, the author is describing how to use the Fourier tranform to price vanilla European call options. If $f_j$ is the Fourier transform of the density function of $x = \ln(S)$ (under measure $Q$), then the probability of exercise under $Q$ (that, is probability $x > \ln(K)$) is

$$F_j (x(T) > a) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int _{\mathbb{R}} f_j(\phi) \Bigg(\int_a^{\infty} e^{-i\phi x} \mathrm{d}x\Bigg) \mathrm{d}\phi\text{.}\tag{1}$$

This equation makes sense to me. The author then says, equation (2.17),

> A further straightforward calculation yields $$F_j (x(T) > a) = \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2\pi}\int_{\mathbb{R}}f_j(\phi)\frac{e^{-i\phi a}}{i\phi}\mathrm{d}\phi \text{.}\tag{2}$$

This equation does not make sense to me. Where did equation (2) come from? In particular, where did the $\frac{1}{2}$ come from?

## Answer by Pleb (score 5)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/69559

#### It comes from a direct application of the Fourier inversion theorem for a CDF:

For a general one-dimensional CDF $F_X(x)$, the Fourier inversion theorem can be described as:

\begin{align} F_X(x) &= \frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^\infty \frac{e^{-iux}\phi_X(u)}{iu} \: du\\ &=\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{\pi} \int_0^\infty \mathcal{R}\left[\frac{e^{-iux}\phi_X(u)}{iu}\right] \: du, \end{align}

where $\phi_X(u)$ is the characteristic function for $X$. See Schmelzle (2010) chapter 3.2 for full derivations.

With regards to the probability of exercise, $F_j(x(T)>a)$, first calculate the inner integral:

$$ F_j(x(T)>a) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{\mathbb{R}}f_j(\phi)\frac{e^{-i\phi a}}{i\phi}\: d\phi. $$

Now, see that:

\begin{align} F_j(x(T)>a) & = 1-F_j(x(T)\leq a)\\ &= 1 - \left(\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f_j(\phi)\frac{e^{-i\phi a}}{i\phi}\: d\phi\right)\\ &=\frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{\mathbb{R}} f_j(\phi)\frac{e^{-i\phi a}}{i\phi}\: d\phi,\\ \end{align} where we — in the second equality — have used that $F_j(x(T)\leq a)$ is a CDF and have inserted its corresponding Fourier inversion counterpart, as seen above. Furthermore, be aware that $f_j(\phi)$ is defined as the characteristic function per equation (2.13) in the book.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.