Skip to content
All library documents

Time Partitions in Adapted Simple Stochastic Processes

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Resorter

Summary

The document explains whether the time intervals in a simple stochastic process can depend on the outcome ω. In the stated definition, the partition points are a fixed increasing sequence of times, while the process takes an outcome-dependent value on each interval. Each value must be measurable with respect to the filtration at the interval’s start, which ensures the process is adapted and supports construction of stochastic integrals.

It distinguishes this from a general simple function on time and the sample space, which can use measurable sets in the product space without the same adapted-process structure. The answer is conceptual and gives no examples or empirical evidence. The distinction depends on the specific definition being used; the response’s definition answers the question for simple processes used in stochastic integration.

Key ideas

  • In the given definition, the partition times are deterministic and do not depend on ω.
  • The process value on each interval may depend on ω.
  • Each interval’s value is measurable with respect to the filtration at its starting time.
  • A general simple function on time and outcomes need not satisfy the adaptedness condition.

Tags

Full text
# Does the partition of time in a simple process depend on the omega in probability space?


# Does the partition of time in a simple process depend on the omega in probability space?












In Steven Shreve's book "Stochastic Calculus for Finance 2", page 126, a simple process $\Delta(t)$ is a stochastic process such that there is a partition of time $0 < t_1 < ... < t_n \leq T$, such that $\Delta(t)$ is a constant for $t_i \leq t < t_{i+1}$. However it is not clear whether this partition of time depends on $\omega\in \Omega$. Does anyone know the answer? Thanks.

## Answer by M. Jeunesse (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/28262

I try to be precise. There is no dependence in $\omega$ for the $t_i$ sequence.

#### simple process

Let $t_0<t_1<\dots<t_n<t_{n+1}$ be a increasing sequence of real-numbers then $f$ is said to be a simple process on a filtered space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F})$ if:

$$f(t,\omega) = \sum_{i\geq 0}\mathbb{1}_{t\in[t_i,t_{i+1})}\xi_i(\omega)\text{ where }\xi_i\text{ is }\mathcal{F}_{t_i}\text{-measurable}$$

Here is an example where you can find this definition and how it is useful to build stochastic integrals: http://www.math.uchicago.edu/~may/VIGRE/VIGRE2008/REUPapers/Olson.pdf

#### simple function

if you talk about simple functions, then you will have:

$$f(t,\omega)=\sum_{k\geq 0}a_k \mathbb{1}_{A_k}$$ where $A_k$ is a borel set of $(\mathbb{R}_+\times \Omega,\text{Bor}(\mathbb{R}_+)\times\mathcal{F})$ but then it is not anymore a process with the notion of adaptability, it is just a random variable.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.