Transforming an Integral of Brownian Motion at Square-Root Time
Summary
The document studies the distribution of the time integral of squared Brownian motion evaluated at the square root of time. It begins by contrasting this process with the more familiar integral of squared Brownian motion at ordinary time, which the questioner associates with a normal distribution. A change of variables converts the integral into one involving a time-weighted Brownian-square process, making clear that the familiar result cannot be applied directly.
The response uses integration by parts and Itô’s formula to rewrite the target integral in terms of the Brownian value at the endpoint, deterministic terms, and an integral of squared Brownian motion over a transformed interval. It notes that the endpoint square has a scaled chi-squared distribution, while the final integral still requires separate analysis. Thus, the derivation provides a representation rather than a complete distribution for the original quantity. It also cautions against inferring normality from the ordinary-time case; no full characterization of the remaining integral is supplied.
Key ideas
- A square-root time change produces a time-weighted integral and does not preserve the ordinary-time result directly.
- Integration by parts and Itô’s formula express the target quantity using endpoint and integral terms.
- The squared Brownian endpoint has a scaled chi-squared distribution.
- The transformed integral of squared Brownian motion remains to be characterized to obtain the full distribution.
- The response does not establish that the original integral is normally distributed.
Tags
Full text
# Distribution of time integral of Brownian motion squared (where the Brownian motion occurs in square root time)?
# Distribution of time integral of Brownian motion squared (where the Brownian motion occurs in square root time)?
Let $I_t = \int_0^t W_{\sqrt{u}}^2du$. What is the distribution of $I$?
If I recall correctly, if the Brownian motion were instead $W_u$, then it would be $I_t \sim N\left(\frac{t^2}{2},\frac{t^4}{3}\right)$.
I tried to do a simple change of variables with $v = \sqrt{u}$, but then this generates a new term in the equation that I'm not sure how to handle (I believe it turns into $\int_0^\sqrt{t} 2v W_v^2dv$, but because of the leading $2v$ coefficient, I don't know how to relate this back to the previous result).
## Answer by Pantelis Sopasakis (score 2)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/43352
Integral $I_t$ does not seem to follow the normal distribution.
$\newcommand{\d}{\mathrm{d}}$Define $I_t = \int_0^{t} W_{\sqrt{u}}^2 \d u$ and let $u = v^2$ as you have already suggested.
By integration by parts
$$ I_t = \int_0^{\sqrt{t}}W_v^2 \d v^2 = \underbrace{W_v^2 v^2\big|_0^{\sqrt{t}}}_{tW_{\sqrt{t}}^2} - \underbrace{\int_0^{\sqrt{t}}v^2\d W_v^2}_{J_t}, $$
where $\d W_v^2 = 2W_v \d W_v + \d v$, therefore,
$$ J_t = \underbrace{\int_0^{\sqrt{t}} 2W_v v^2 \d W_v}_{K_t} + \underbrace{\int_0^{\sqrt{t}}v^2 \d v}_{\tfrac{1}{3}t^{3/2}} $$
Now define $f(v, x) = vx^2$ and apply Itô's formula:
\begin{align} &\d(v W_v^2) {}={} W_v^2 \d v + 2vW_v \d W_v + \tfrac{1}{2}(2v)\d v\\ \Rightarrow{}& \sqrt{t}W_{\sqrt{t}}^2{}={}\int_0^{\sqrt{t}} W_v^2 \d v + K_t + \int_0^{\sqrt{t}}v\d v\\ \Rightarrow{}& K_t = \sqrt{t}W_{\sqrt{t}}^2-\tfrac{1}{2}t - \int_0^{\sqrt{t}} W_v^2 \d v, \end{align}
therefore
\begin{align} I_t {}={}& tW_{\sqrt{t}}^2 - K_t - \tfrac{1}{3}t^{3/2} \\ {}={}&(t - \sqrt{t})W_{\sqrt{t}}^2 + \tfrac{1}{2}t - \tfrac{1}{3}t^{3/2} + \int_0^{\sqrt{t}} W_v^2 \d v \end{align}
Note that $W_{\sqrt{t}}^2$ follows a chi-squared distribution, the second and third terms are deterministic and the integrands of the last term, $W_v^2$ follow a chi-squared distribution too.
Regarding the last integral, you can check out this question on QSE.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.