University Proximity, Headquarters Relocation, and Stock Returns

Summary

This document asks whether relocating a company's headquarters closer to a highly ranked technical or engineering university can raise its subsequent stock returns. It frames the question around a claim in a popular business book and notes Nike as an example offered by the author of that claim. The document provides no citation supporting the specific university-proximity argument and seeks academic work that tests it directly.

The author mentions broader research on stock-price effects around headquarters relocations, as well as studies of return co-movement among firms with nearby headquarters. Those areas are presented as related but distinct from evidence that moving toward a top university improves returns. No results or direct answer are supplied, so the document serves as a literature-search prompt rather than evidence for the proposed investment relationship. Any conclusion would require research that isolates university proximity and subsequent performance from other reasons firms relocate.

Key ideas

• The document asks whether moving a headquarters closer to a leading technical university predicts higher later stock returns.
• It attributes the premise to a business book but notes that it provides no supporting citation.
• The author distinguishes general relocation studies from work on return co-movement among geographically nearby firms.
• No study directly testing the proposed university-proximity effect or empirical result is presented.

Tags

# Headquarter Relocation and Stock Return - Influence of Universities


# Headquarter Relocation and Stock Return - Influence of Universities












Scott Galloway states in chapter 8, The T Algorithm, in his book The Four: The Hidden DNA of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, and Google, that a successful strategy to become a "trillion dollar company" must consider geography:

> A companies headquarter should be located near a world-class technical or engineering teaching university.

Is there any academic paper which specifically analyzes that a headquarter relocation towards a high-ranking university generates higher stock returns in subsequent periods?

Scott Galloway gives no reference for this statement, but mentions Nike Inc. as an example, that they should clearly profit (he estimates up to 10 billion US-$) from a relocation. I just found general studies from Chinmoy et al. (1995) on stock price effects of headquarters relocations. Further papers like Pirinsky/Wang (2006) and the related (and also current) literature focuses solely on the return co-movement of stocks where the companies headquarters are nearly located.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.