Skip to content
All library documents

USDC-Settled BTC and ETH Options: Settlement, Hedging, and Peg Risk

Article Deribit Insights
Read the original

Summary

The document explains the launch of USDC-settled BTC and ETH options alongside existing coin-settled contracts. It describes linear option payouts in USDC, contrasts them with inverse products settled in the underlying coin, and outlines how the choice affects collateral use. It also notes that the new contracts have smaller public-book minimum sizes and tick sizes, while block trade size limits are unchanged.

For traders using both contract types, aligned BTC-USDC and BTC-USD index values support hedging and portfolio-margin offsets. The article gives examples of call and put expiry payouts and describes how offsetting positions can reduce margin requirements. USDC settlement may suit stablecoin-focused traders, while inverse options may fit holders seeking to use BTC or ETH as collateral. The main caveat is that USDC can depeg: settlement assumes parity with USD, but collateral valuation still uses the USDC/USD exchange rate. The article is an exchange product overview, and its stated reward rate and launch details reflect the time of publication.

Key ideas

  • USDC-settled options pay their intrinsic value in USDC, while inverse options settle in the underlying coin.
  • The new contracts offer smaller public-book trade and tick sizes than inverse equivalents.
  • Aligned USDC and USD index values are intended to support hedging and margin offsets across contract types.
  • Stablecoin-focused traders may prefer linear contracts, while coin holders may prefer inverse contracts as collateral.
  • USDC depeg risk remains relevant because collateral valuation uses the USDC/USD exchange rate.

Tags

CryptoOptionsDerivatives pricingRisk management

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.