Using Both FX Quote Sides to Build Mid-Prices and Market Quotes
Summary
The discussion asks whether high-frequency foreign-exchange ask quotes are considered less reliable than bids. The answers reject that general rule: they describe FX quotes as actionable and argue that both sides are needed to construct a mid-price and then set a trader’s own bids and offers. One answer contrasts FX with a bond-market convention of focusing on bids, while another notes that liquidity is concentrated on major electronic venues for some currency pairs.
The practical takeaway is to use both quote sides when modeling or making a market, while choosing a mid-price suited to the intended trading approach. The discussion gives practitioner opinions rather than empirical comparisons, formal references, or data-quality tests. It does not establish that every venue’s quotes are equally reliable, and it does not resolve how quote quality varies across providers, pairs, or market conditions.
Key ideas
- FX ask quotes should not be discarded as a general rule based on bid-focused conventions from other markets.
- Both sides of the market can inform a trader’s mid-price and the quotes they choose to make.
- The appropriate mid-price may depend on the trading model and the size of trades being considered.
- The answers offer practitioner reasoning but provide no empirical study comparing quote quality.
Tags
Full text
# What is the data quality of ask (offer) versus bid quotes in FX markets? # What is the data quality of ask (offer) versus bid quotes in FX markets? I'm working with high frequency FX data. Because the FX market is a decentralized market, different traders often have slightly different prices at the same moment. I can see how this would potentially affect data quality, and I remember reading some work in which the author dismissed the use of ask quotes as being low quality data, so they only used bids. I'm afraid have forgotten who/where this was. My question is: is it a common perception in literature that high frequency FX ask quotes are no good, and would you have any references for me that make this point? EDIT: I've not yet accepted an answer, because I am looking for a reference that makes the point either way. ## Answer by JoshK (score 0, accepted) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25870 I think that is coming from the bond market where there in the past has been the idea of "marking to the bid". People would usually ask for a two-way-market and most of the time they would be expecting that the bid would be hit. With FX data you are looking at actionable markets so they are all good. ## Answer by rupweb (score 0) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/25888 The way the FX market prices is to get a baseline mid price and then apply skew(s) and spread(s). So the answer to your question is no. As for references, the way the FX market works is that liquidity in currency pairs is pushed either to EBS or Reuters. That's so that there isn't a monopoly on prices. For example, the most trading in the EURUSD takes place on EBS. For GBPUSD it's Reuters. And so on.... So actually the market isn't as "decentralised" as it's made out to be... ## Answer by alex talei (score 0) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/27917 dismissing ask (offer) data in fx makes no sense (not sure if it does anywhere else either).. you need to build your own mid-price (don't just subtract bid from offer like most do unless you run a very simple small clip-size taker model). you then take the mid-price to make your own bids / offers. not sure what you're trying to do - since you mentioned HFT - guess you are trying to make a market - so setting your mid-price is crucial for you to be able to do anything in fx, in order to do that, you need to see both sides of the market (bids and offers). hope helps ;
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.