Using Classic and Hidden Divergence with an Accelerator Oscillator

Summary

This article reviews classic and hidden divergence as ways to compare price swings with changes in an oscillator. Classic divergence—where price makes a new extreme that the indicator does not match—is presented as a possible warning of a weakening move. Hidden divergence, where price and oscillator swings diverge in the opposite pattern, is treated as trend confirmation. The author discusses RSI, Stochastic, MACD, and volume-based signals, while noting that each can produce ambiguous or false readings. The suggested safeguards include identifying an established trend, focusing on nearby swing points, and confirming entries with price action or candlestick analysis.

The proposed variant uses Bill Williams’ Accelerator Oscillator to identify divergences and generate earlier signals, accepting more noise as a trade-off. A related expert advisor places pending orders around graphical levels and deletes orders when price moves away before they trigger. The article’s example is a visual test on GBPUSD at an hourly interval using default settings. The author describes the assessment as subjective, says automated optimization is not possible for this graphical method, and notes that incorrect indicator-line construction may require manual correction. The results are preliminary and do not establish a robust edge.

Key ideas

• Classic divergence compares price extremes with oscillator extremes and may warn of weakening momentum.
• Hidden divergence is presented as a way to identify possible continuation of an existing trend.
• RSI, Stochastic, MACD, and volume can all help identify divergence, but each has limitations.
• The proposed strategy uses the Accelerator Oscillator for earlier signals and accepts added noise.
• The visual GBPUSD test is described as subjective, and the method may need manual line corrections.

Tags

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.