Skip to content
All library documents

Valuing a Life Annuity with Gompertz-Makeham Mortality

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Drwk

Summary

The document sets up the present value of a life annuity that pays a fixed amount yearly from a deferred start date until the holder dies. It discounts each possible payment using the relevant zero rate and weights it by the probability that the holder survives to the payment date. It then asks how that survival probability follows from the Gompertz-Makeham force of mortality, which varies with attained age and elapsed time.

The text gives the survival expression as the exponential of the negative integrated mortality rate, but does not derive it or work through the integral. It is therefore a question about connecting a hazard rate to a survival function, rather than a complete valuation solution. The setup also leaves timing conventions, such as whether payments occur at the start or end of each year, implicit, and assumes known discount rates and the stated mortality model.

Key ideas

  • The expected annuity value sums discounted payments weighted by the chance the holder survives to each payment date.
  • The Gompertz-Makeham mortality rate depends on age and elapsed time, so the rate must be integrated over the survival period.
  • The survival probability is expressed as the exponential of the negative cumulative mortality hazard.
  • Payment timing conventions affect which survival probability and discount factor apply to each installment.

Tags

Full text
# Life annuity and the use of Gompertz-Makeham


# Life annuity and the use of Gompertz-Makeham












The question goes as follows:

> Consider a life annuity contract that pays the holder a yearly fixed amount from a certain time until the death of the holder of the contract. (a) Suppose the value today of the random cash flow $C_K$ in k years is $E[C_k]e^{-r_kk}$, where $r_k$ is the current $k$-year zero rate. All the zero rates are assumed to be known. Determine an expression for the current value of an annuity whose holder is x years old, the annuity pays the yearly amount $c$ starting from $y$ years from today and the current mortality rate is given by the Gompertz-Makeham formula: $\mu_0(x)=A+R^{\alpha x}$

So if I've understood correctly $C_k$ can be seen as a random variable and it's value can be described as mentioned above. This is some what confusing because I feel that it would be more logical to describe $E[C_k]e^{-r_kk}$ as the liability, which could be described a random variable...anyways.

Moreover the holder of age x gets paid a yearly amount $c$ thus the value of the liability can be described as:

$E[L]=\sum^{\infty}_{k=y}E[C_k]e^{-r_kk}=\sum^{\infty}_{k=y}ce^{-r_kk}$.

This is obviously if you assume that the holder survives to infinity which makes no sense. Thus applying a probability that the holder dies after a certain payment time $k$ seems logical. Thus:

$E[L]=\sum^{\infty}_{k=y}ce^{-r_kk}P(\tau>k)$.

Or if one wants to be more correct and thorough one can reason in the following way:

Assume that the liability is the constant pay $c$ if the holder dies after a certain payment $k$ leading to:

$L=\sum^{\infty}_{k=y}C_ke^{-r_kk}I(\tau>k)$, where I is the indicator function. The value of $L$ thus becomes:

$E[L]=\sum^{\infty}_{k=y}ce^{-r_kk}P(\tau>k)$.

Here is where I get stuck. In the solution they define the probability $P(\tau>k)$ as:

$P(\tau>k)=e^{-\int^{k}_0(A+Re^{\alpha(x+u)})du}$.

I don't really follow how they manage to define the probability. There is an example in the book but they jump over the explanation. It's probably something simple but I fail to see what how.

Any form of help is appreciated.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.