Variance of an Exponentially Weighted Poisson Jump Sum
Summary
The document derives the variance of a sum of normally distributed jump sizes weighted by an exponential decay kernel, as used in a mean-reverting spot process. It identifies an error in treating the second moment of the Poisson integral as only the intensity times the integral of the squared weight. That expression omits the squared contribution of the mean, which matters when jump sizes have nonzero expectation.
The derivation separates the compensated Poisson process, whose stochastic integral has variance given by the integrated squared weight, from the deterministic compensator. It then incorporates random jump marks, assuming they are independent of the Poisson process. The resulting variance contains a term for the second moment of a jump mark and another term reflecting mark variance across the expected number of jumps. A limiting check as mean reversion approaches zero agrees with the direct compound-Poisson calculation. The result depends on the stated independence and distribution assumptions; dependent marks or a different arrival process require a revised derivation.
Key ideas
- The squared moment of a Poisson integral includes a squared-mean contribution as well as the variance contribution.
- Compensating a Poisson process turns its integral into a martingale with a tractable variance.
- Independent random jump marks add both their second moment and a term involving their variance.
- The zero mean-reversion limit can be checked against the variance of a compound-Poisson sum.
- The derivation assumes independent marks and a constant-intensity Poisson arrival process.
Tags
Full text
# Variance of Poisson integral
# Variance of Poisson integral
I am looking for the solution to the expression $$\text{Var}(\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\ln(J)\text{d}N_s)$$ where $\ln(J)\sim N(\mu, \sigma^2)$ and $N$ has intensity $\lambda$. The term comes from a mean reverting spot process which has lognormal jumps. The log spot is obtained using Ito's formula and using the integrating factor method. The Jump part of this term has the for $$\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\ln(J)\text{d}N_s.$$ I want to find the variance of this as it contributes to the volatility of the process.
I have tried to compute it using $$\mathbb{E}[\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\ln(J)\text{d}N_s]=\lambda \mathbb{E}[\ln(J)]\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\text{d}s$$ and $$\mathbb{E}[(\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\ln(J)\text{d}N_s)^2]=\lambda \mathbb{E}[\ln(J)^2]\int_t^Te^{-2a(T-s)}\text{d}s,$$ however when combined to find the variance, it gives me negative values when $a$ is small. I have also tried computing it using probability methods i.e., simulating the jumps times using an exponential distribution and computing the random variable $$Y=\sum_{i=1}^{N_{T-t}}e^{-a(T-T_i)}\ln(J)_i$$ where $\ln(J)_i$ are draws from the above normal distribution then using the realisations of this, compute the variance. But it gives me a different answer to the above. Any help would be appreciated.
## Answer by Kurt G. (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/82092
Something is wrong with your second expectation (where you have the square in it). It also looks like you are silently assuming that $J$ and $N$ are independent.
Let's consider the martingale $$\tag1 M_t=N_t-\lambda t $$ whose quadratic variation is $$\tag2 [M]_t=N_t $$ as shown here.
By the Ito isometry for semimartingales we get \begin{align*}\tag3\require{ulem} &\mathbb E\left[\left(\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\,dM_s\right)^2\right]= \mathbb E\left[\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-2a(T-s)}\,d[M]_s\right]= \mathbb E\left[\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-2a(T-s)}\,dN_s\right]\\[2mm] &\stackrel{(*)}=\mathbb E\left[\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-2a(T-s)}\,\lambda\,ds\right]=\lambda e^{-2aT}\tfrac{e^{2aT}-e^{2at}}{2a}=\underline{\underline{\lambda\tfrac{1-e^{-2a(T-t)}}{2a}}}\,.\tag4 \end{align*} In (*) I have used that $$\tag5 \textstyle\int_0^te^{-2a(T-s)}dM_s=\int_0^te^{-2a(T-s)}d(N_s-\lambda s) $$ is a martingale.
By now we know that the variance of $$\tag6 \textstyle\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\,dM_s $$ is given by the RHS of (4). But this is obviously also the variance of $$\tag7 Y:=\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\,dN_s $$ because (6) and (7) differ only by a deterministic term.
Correction.
The following is clear from the martingale property: $$\tag8 \mathbb E[Y]=\mathbb E\left[\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\,dN_s\right]= \textstyle\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\,\lambda\,ds=\lambda e^{-aT}\frac{e^{aT}-e^{at}}{a} =\lambda \frac{1-e^{-a(T-t)}}{a}\,. $$ Therefore, by (4) and (8), \begin{align}\tag9 \mathbb E[Y^2]&=\operatorname{Var}[Y]+\mathbb E[Y]^2=\lambda\tfrac{1-e^{-2a(T-t)}}{2a}+\lambda^2\left(\tfrac{1-e^{-a(T-t)}}{a}\right)^2\,. \end{align} It is also clear that for two independent r.v. $X,Y$ we have $$\tag{10} \operatorname{Var}[XY]=\mathbb E[X^2]\mathbb E[Y^2]-\mathbb E[X]^2\mathbb E[Y]^2\,. $$ Applying this to $X=\ln J$ gives in total \begin{align} &\operatorname{Var}\left[\textstyle\int_t^Te^{-a(T-s)}\ln J\,dN_s\right]\\[2mm]&= \mathbb E[(\ln J)^2]\left\{ \lambda\tfrac{1-e^{-2a(T-t)}}{2a}+\lambda^2\left(\tfrac{1-e^{-a(T-t)}}{a}\right)^2\right\}\\[2mm]&~-\mathbb E[\ln J]^2\lambda^2\left(\tfrac{1-e^{-a(T-t)}}{a}\right)^2\\[2mm] &=\underline{\underline{\mathbb E[(\ln J)^2] \lambda\tfrac{1-e^{-2a(T-t)}}{2a}+\operatorname{Var}[\ln J]\lambda^2\left(\tfrac{1-e^{-a(T-t)}}{a}\right)^2}}\,.\tag{11} \end{align} Sanity check: For $a\to 0$ this becomes $$\tag{12} \mathbb E[(\ln J)^2]\lambda(T-t)+\operatorname{Var}[\ln J]\lambda^2(T-t)^2\,. $$ Setting $a=0$ from the beginning we get a variance of \begin{align} &\operatorname{Var}[\ln J(N_T-N_t)]\\[2mm] &\stackrel{(10)}=\mathbb E[(\ln J)^2]\mathbb E[(N_T-N_t)^2]-\mathbb E[\ln J]^2\mathbb E[N_T-N_t]^2\\[2mm] &=\mathbb E[(\ln J)^2]\Big\{\operatorname{Var}[N_T-N_t]+\mathbb E[N_T-N_t]^2\Big\}-\mathbb E[\ln J]^2\mathbb E[N_T-N_t]^2\\[2mm] &=\mathbb E[(\ln J)^2]\Big\{\lambda(T-t)+\lambda^2(T-t)^2\Big\} -\mathbb E[\ln J]^2\lambda^2(T-t)^2\tag{13} \end{align} which is seen to be equal to (12).Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.