Skip to content
All library documents

Visualizing the Stochastic Discount Factor and Risk-Neutral Densities

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Stéphane

Summary

The document illustrates how a stochastic discount factor changes the distribution of stock outcomes when moving from the physical measure to the risk-neutral measure in the Black–Scholes setting. It describes geometric Brownian motion under the physical measure, gives the lognormal density for a process with proportional drift and volatility, and relates the discount factor to the market price of risk through a change of measure.

The example compares stock-price densities under both measures and the discount-factor density under the physical measure. It explains that discounting assigns relatively more weight to low-price states, so the risk-neutral distribution shifts weight toward economically poor outcomes and lowers the expected stock price to the risk-free growth rate. The post reports example parameters, plots, and expectations as evidence, but these are illustrative results for a constant-parameter model; they do not establish how the relationship behaves in more general markets.

Key ideas

  • The Black–Scholes stock price has a lognormal density under either measure, with the drift changing across measures.
  • The stochastic discount factor is driven by the market price of risk and the Brownian motion.
  • Risk-neutral weighting places relatively more probability on low stock-price outcomes.
  • The example checks the measure change by comparing expectations of the stock, discount factor, and discounted stock.

Tags

Full text
# Illustrating the change of measure in Black-Scholes-Merton


# Illustrating the change of measure in Black-Scholes-Merton












Say that we have the following environment: \begin{align} dS_t &= \mu S_t dt + \sigma S_t dZ_t \\ dB_t &= r B_t dt \end{align} where $S_t$ is the price of a stock, $B_t$ is the price of a risk-free bond and $\left( Z_t \right)_{t \geq 0}$ is a standard Brownian motion. It's easy enough to get the densities for either $S_t/S_0$ or $ln S_t - ln S_0$ under both the physical and risk-neutral measures.

What I would like to know, though, is how I could tie those densities to the stochastic discount factor. I know that the SDF is going to take the form $$ M_t = M_0 \exp \left( -r\int_0^t ds - \frac{\eta^2}{2}\int_0^t ds - \eta \int_0^t dZ_s \right) $$ where $\eta = \frac{\mu - r}{\sigma}$ is the Sharp ratio. Specifically, this makes $M_tS_t$ and $M_tB_t$ martingales under the physical measure.

I know that, intuitively, $M_t$ is going to increase the density for lower values of $S_t/S_0$ (and likewise for $ln S_t - lnS_0$). However, is there a way I can illustrate this?

I know that the ratio of risk-neutral to physical densities for $S_t/S_0$ is going to have an exponential appearance, but I'm not sure how to formally tie it back to some aspect of the model. Anyone knows how to visualize this?

## Answer by Kevin (score 5, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/59789

### The model

In a Black-Scholes world, we have under $\mathbb{P}$ \begin{align*} \text{d}S_t &= \mu S_t\text{d}t+\sigma S_t\text{d}W_t^\mathbb P \hspace{1.7cm} \implies\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[S_t]=S_0e^{\mu t}, \\ \text{d}M_t &= -r M_t\text{d}t+\varphi M_t\text{d}W_t^\mathbb P \hspace{1cm} \implies\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[M_t]=e^{-r t}, \\ \text{d}M_tS_t &= (\varphi+\sigma) M_tS_t\text{d}W_t^\mathbb P \hspace{1.6cm} \implies\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{P}[M_tS_t]=S_0, \end{align*} where $M_0=1$, $\text{d}B_t=rB_t\text{d}t$ and $\varphi=-\frac{\mu-r}{\sigma}$ is the Girsanov kernel.

Under $\mathbb{Q}$, we have \begin{align*} \text{d}S_t &= \mu S_t\text{d}t+\sigma S_t\text{d}W_t^\mathbb Q \hspace{1.7cm} \implies\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}[S_t]=S_0e^{r t}, \\ \text{d}\frac{S_t}{B_t} &= \sigma \frac{S_t}{B_t}\text{d}W_t^\mathbb Q \hspace{3.2cm} \implies\mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q}\left[\frac{S_t}{B_t}\right]=S_0. \end{align*}

### The densities

In general, $\text{d}X_t=mX_t\text{d}t+sX_t\text{d}Z_t$ with $X_0=x_0$ gives rise to a process where $X_t$ is log-normally distributed for every $t$ with probability density function \begin{align*} f_{X_t}(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}x\sqrt{s^2t}}\exp\left(-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\ln(x/x_0)-\left(m-\frac{1}{2}s^2\right)t}{\sqrt{s^2t}}\right)^2\right). \end{align*}

### Plots

I plot below the density of the stock price $S_t$ (under $\mathbb{P}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$) and the density of the SDF $M_t$ (under $\mathbb{P}$ of course). I use $T=1$ (one year), $\mu=0.12$, $r=0.01$, $\sigma=0.3$ and $S_0=1$. Plotting the densities from $S_T=0$ up to $S_T=4$ is enough for the densities to numerically integrate to one.

As you see, the SDF puts the most weight on low values of $S_T$. That makes sense. The SDF is driven by marginal utility and marginal utility and risk aversion are high in bad states of nature. Similarly, the risk-neutral density of the stock price puts more weight on economically bad states of nature and reduces the likelihood of good events. Thereby, it reduces the expected future stock price from $S_0e^{\mu t}$ to $S_0e^{rt}$.

The full picture would be this

Computing the expectation corresponding these densities, $\int_0^4 xf(x)\text{d}x$, we indeed get $S_0e^{\mu T}\approx1.1275$ for the $\mathbb{P}$-density, $e^{-rt}\approx0.9899$ for the density of $M_t$, $S_0e^{rT}\approx1.01$ for the density of $S_T$ under $\mathbb{Q}$ and, of course, $S_0=1$ for the densities of $M_TS_T$ and $\frac{S_T}{B_T}$.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.