Skip to content
All library documents

What ISIN and CUSIP Characters Reveal About Bond Issuers

Article Quant Q&A · Author: quant_zero

Summary

The discussion explains how much issuer information can sometimes be inferred from a bond’s ISIN, particularly for US securities carrying a CUSIP. A CUSIP contains an issuer portion, an issue identifier, and a check character; a corresponding US ISIN commonly includes the country code followed by the CUSIP and an additional check character. Matching the issuer portion can therefore be evidence that two bonds share an issuer.

That inference is not a universal way to identify a parent company. Issuers may receive new identifiers after issuing many bonds or changing through mergers and name changes, while older bonds retain their original identifiers. Some offerings have no CUSIP, and non-US ISINs may contain no readily interpretable issuer code. Even matching issuer identifiers do not reveal whether bonds have the same seniority or claim priority. The method is therefore a useful clue for certain US bonds, not a complete issuer lookup or a guide to bond equivalence.

Key ideas

  • A US bond ISIN commonly embeds its CUSIP after the country code.
  • The issuer portion of a CUSIP can help show that two bonds share an issuer.
  • Matching identifiers do not guarantee that bonds have the same seniority or payment priority.
  • Issuer code changes, legacy bonds, non-CUSIP securities, and non-US formats limit issuer inference from ISIN characters.

Tags

Full text
# Determining parent issuer from ISIN


# Determining parent issuer from ISIN












What digits/letters of a bond's ISIN correspond to its parent company issuer? I have noticed that for many bonds, the first two digits stand for the country of issuance and oftentimes there is agreement on up to 8. However, for some bonds, such as US69353RFG83 and US693475AT21, they agree on 'US693' only, though they both were issued by PNC. As pointed out in the comments the issuers are technically different, PNC vs PNC Financial Services, but they have the same parent ticker.

How many digits of the ISIN are needed to uniquely identify the issuer? Is this spelled out somewhere?

## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 3, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/46504

The short answer is that sometimes you can tell from the ISINs that two bonds have the same issuer; but the converse does not work. Some bonds have a CUSIP assigned (for a small fee when the bond is issued) by the CUSIP authority (which happens to be Standard & Poors). A CUSIP has 9 characters: 6 characters for the issuer; 2 characters for the issue; and 1 checksum digit. If a bond has a CUSIP then its 12-character ISIN is almost certain to contain the country code US, followed by the 9-character cusip, followed by one more checksum digit. So if you see two bonds whose ISINs coincide on characters 3 thru 8, then they're almost certain to have the same issuer. (However they still might not be pari passou - e.g. one might be senior unsecured, another subordinated... you can't tell the tier from the ISIN). However the converse does not work for several reasons. One, some issuers issue so many bonds that 2 characters aren't enough for the issue. In this case the CUSIP authority just begins to use another 6-character issuer code. One obvious example is U.S. Treasury. Another example is the Mexican oil company, Petróleos Mexicanos. Another reason is, sometimes corporate issuers merge, or just change names. In this case, the CUSIP authority assigns new CUSIPs to the equities; but does not change CUSIPs of the existing bonds. However newly issued bonds will use the new 6 issuer code. Some bonds (e.g. Reg S) might not have any CUSIP assigned. In thic case, their ISIN might start with XS, followed by 10 characters that generally don't have any indication of the issuer. ISINs of non-USD bonds generally start with a country code, e.g. an ISIN of a Russian rouble denominated bond might have a RU + 10 random-looking characters.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.