Skip to content
All library documents

When Early Exercise Can Be Optimal for an American Call

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Michal

Summary

The question seeks binomial-model parameters that would make early exercise possible for an American call. The answer gives a general condition instead of a numerical example: a positive dividend rate or a negative interest rate is needed. Under the standard setting with neither condition, early exercise is never optimal for a call, so changing the binomial up and down factors or strike alone will not produce the requested case.

The explanation frames this as a model-free result, rather than a peculiarity of a particular binomial parameter choice. It gives no derivation, numerical illustration, or detailed treatment of dividend timing and rate conventions. The takeaway is therefore a useful constraint for constructing examples and checking an American-call pricing tree, while applications should ensure the model’s carry assumptions match the asset and contract being valued.

Key ideas

  • For a standard American call, early exercise is not optimal when interest rates are nonnegative and the underlying pays no dividends.
  • A positive dividend rate can make early exercise worth considering.
  • A negative interest rate can also make early exercise possible.
  • The answer gives a general condition, not a specific binomial parameter set or derivation.

Tags

Full text
# binomial - parameters at which american option hits early exercise possibility


# binomial - parameters at which american option hits early exercise possibility












I am looking for a set of parameters (d,u,r,So,K, N=?) for pricing an american call using binomial where the call hits the early exercise possibility.

Do you have any exemplary set?

## Answer by Mark Joshi (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/22864

you need a positive dividend rate or a negative interest rate. Without these, it is a model-free result that early exercise is never optimal for a call option.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.