Skip to content
All library documents

Why a Digital Option’s Price Contains the Normal CDF Term N(d2)

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Trajan

Summary

The document explains the N(d2) term in the price of a cash-or-nothing digital call that pays a fixed amount if the underlying finishes at or above the strike. Under the Black–Scholes assumptions, the discounted expected payoff is the cash amount multiplied by the risk-neutral probability that the terminal price exceeds the strike. Modeling the terminal price as lognormally distributed turns that event probability into the standard normal cumulative distribution evaluated at d2.

The derivation standardizes the Brownian increment over the option’s remaining life and uses symmetry of the normal distribution to express the upper-tail probability as N(d2). Thus N(d2) represents the risk-neutral chance of receiving the fixed payoff, while discounting accounts for its payment at maturity. The explanation depends on the specified model and assumptions, including constant volatility and risk-neutral valuation; it does not claim that the probability is an observed real-world forecast.

Key ideas

  • A cash-or-nothing digital call pays its fixed amount when the terminal price reaches or exceeds the strike.
  • Its value is the discounted fixed payoff multiplied by the risk-neutral probability of that event.
  • Under Black–Scholes assumptions, the terminal price distribution makes that probability equal to N(d2).
  • The normal CDF term arises by standardizing the Brownian increment and evaluating the relevant tail probability.
  • N(d2) is a model-based risk-neutral probability, not necessarily a real-world forecast.

Tags

Full text
# Formula for the discounted payoff of a digital option


# Formula for the discounted payoff of a digital option












In "Heard on the Street" it states that the expected discounted payoff of a digital option is $$H\exp^{-r(T-t)}N(d_2)$$

where $H$ is the payoff of the option, the exponential is the discounting.

Why do we have the $N(d_2)$, what does it represent and why is it there?

## Answer by Canardini (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/50483

The digital option pays $H$ at time $T$ if $S_T \geq K$ , so its option time at time $t$ is given by

$$V_t=E_t\left[e^{-r(T-t)}H 1_{\{S_T \geq K\}}\right]=e^{-r(T-t)}H* P_t(S_T \geq K)$$

The model used is Black-model, that $$dS_t=rS_tdt+\sigma dW_t$$

or $$S_T=S_te^{\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)+\sigma (W_T-W_t)}{}$$

Calculate $ P_t(S_T \geq K)$

$$ P_t(S_T \geq K)=P_t(S_te^{\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)+\sigma (W_T-W_t)}{} \geq K)=P_t(W_T-W_t \geq\frac{log\frac{K}{S_0}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma})$$

$W_T-W_t |W_t$ is centered and normally distributed with variance $T-t$ $$P_t(W_T-W_t \geq\frac{log\frac{K}{S_0}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma})=P(Y \geq\frac{log\frac{K}{S_t}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma \sqrt{T-t}})$$

where $Y \sim \mathcal{N}(0,1)$

Using the symmetry of the normal distribution,

$$P(Y \geq\frac{log\frac{K}{S_t}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma \sqrt{T-t}})=P(Y \leq -\frac{log\frac{K}{S_t}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma \sqrt{T-t}})$$

Define $$d_2=-\frac{log\frac{K}{S_t}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma \sqrt{T-t}}=\frac{log\frac{S_t}{K}+\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma \sqrt{T-t}}$$

$$P(Y \leq -\frac{log\frac{K}{S_t}-\left(r-\frac12 \sigma^2\right)(T-t)}{\sigma \sqrt{T-t}})=P(Y \leq d_2)=N(d_2)$$

where $N$ is the cdf of a standard normal variable.

Finally,

$$V_t=E_t\left[e^{-r(T-t)}H 1_{\{S_T \geq K\}}\right]=e^{-r(T-t)}H*N(d_2)$$

## Answer by siou0107 (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/50479

$N\left(d_2\right)$ is the risk-neutral probability that the spot is greater than the strike at maturity, therefore the RN probability that you get your payoff.

## Answer by Kevin (score 3)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/50481

Recall that the price of your contract is \begin{align*} V_t = e^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} [H1_{\{S_T>K\}}|\mathcal{F}_t] \end{align*} because your option always pays $H$ if $S_T>K$. Next, \begin{align*} V_t &=He^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{E}^\mathbb{Q} [1_{\{S_T>K\}}|\mathcal{F}_t] \\ &= He^{-r(T-t)} \mathbb{Q} [{\{S_T>K\}}|\mathcal{F}_t] \\ &= He^{-r(T-t)} N(d_2) \end{align*} The fact that the option price equals the discounted (conditional) expectation of the payoff is linked with no-arbitrage via the fundamental theorem of asset pricing.

You can compute the probability of $\{S_T>K\}$ under the Black-Scholes model to obtain $N(d_2)$.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.