Why a Perpetual American Call Without Dividends Is Worth Spot
Summary
The document addresses why a standard perpetual-option PDE solution for an American put does not transfer directly to a call. In the no-dividend setting, the continuation-region solution for the call has a linear form, and the question is how to determine its coefficient. The answers propose considering an exercise policy that triggers when spot reaches a chosen level above the strike, with a rebate equal to the intrinsic value at that barrier.
Value matching gives a call value proportional to spot, with a coefficient that increases as the exercise barrier rises. Since the derivative with respect to the barrier is positive, the value is maximized as the barrier tends to infinity, making the coefficient one. The resulting value is spot, consistent with delaying exercise indefinitely under the stated assumptions. The derivation assumes no dividends and treats the barrier policy as the route to the result; the document does not explore how dividends, costs, or other market assumptions would change the valuation.
Key ideas
- For a perpetual American call without dividends, the continuation value has a linear form in spot.
- A proposed exercise barrier above the strike produces a value coefficient that rises with the barrier.
- Maximizing over the barrier sends it to infinity and makes the coefficient one.
- The conclusion relies on the no-dividend assumption.
Tags
Full text
# Why it is not possible to price American perpetual call option using PDE approach?
# Why it is not possible to price American perpetual call option using PDE approach?
Using a standard PDE approach to price an American perpetual put option I obtain that the price of such option has the following form: $$ V(S) = A S + B S^{-2r/\sigma^2}. $$ And then I need to find a proper $A$ and $B$ coefficients to have the final solution. Finally I receive: $$ V(S) = \frac{K\sigma^2}{2r + \sigma^2}\left(\frac{S}{K} \frac{2r + \sigma^2}{2r}\right)^{-2r/\sigma^2}, \quad S \geq S^{*} = \frac{K}{1+\frac{\sigma^2}{2r}}. $$
This result is taken f.e. from 'Paul Wilmott on Quantitative Finance' book.
My question is:
Why I can not use the same technique to price American perpetual call option? When I apply the same method I obtain that my price has a form: $$ V(S) = A S. $$ But I am not able to derive that the coefficient $A$ should be equal to $1$.
Can anybody explain me where is the key issue of this problem?
## Answer by peter carr (score 4)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/38587
I suggest you first value a perpetual up and out call with a barrier B above max of strike K and initial spot and a rebate paid at first barrier hit equal to B - K. Then maximize this value over B. Continuing to assume no dividends, I believe you will find that the optimal B is infinite and that the up and out call value converges to spot. I haven’t actually done the calculation but it seems like a worthwhile exercise.
## Answer by LocalVolatility (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/39121
As suggested by Peter, you start by assuming a given policy to exercise when the spot price hits the level $B > K$ for the first time. Then the value matching condition implies
\begin{equation} V(B) = A S = B - K \qquad \Leftrightarrow \qquad A = \frac{B - K}{B}. \end{equation}
Thus for $S \leq B$, we have
\begin{equation} V(S) = \left( 1 - \frac{K}{B} \right) S. \end{equation}
Taking the derivative w.r.t. $B$ yields
\begin{equation} \frac{\partial V}{\partial B} = \frac{K S}{B^2} \end{equation}
Since this is strictly positive, it follows that the $B^* = \infty$ and thus $A^* = 1$. The only exception is when $S = 0$. In this case the option is worthless no matter what exercise policy you employ.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.