Why Algorithmic Trading Shares Differ Across Regions
Summary
The discussion considers why algorithmic trading may represent different shares of trading across the United States, Europe, and Asia. It points to market fragmentation, especially in U.S. equities, as one possible driver: fungible instruments trading across venues can create arbitrage and electronic trading opportunities. Comparisons also depend on the products involved, since some instruments are more readily interchangeable than others.
The answer cautions that “algorithmic trading” is not consistently defined. Reported activity may include broker execution algorithms and smart order routing, as well as fully automated strategies, while the U.S. has broad investor participation and a larger range of electronic trading services. It rejects the idea that the difference necessarily reflects superior U.S. technology or an obvious venue advantage; major firms operate globally, and exchanges can compete for trading activity. The source offers qualitative explanations rather than data to test their relative importance, and a second answer briefly asserts that European equities are more fragmented, underscoring that fragmentation depends on the market segment and measure used.
Key ideas
- Fragmentation can create more opportunities for electronic strategies in fungible instruments traded across venues.
- Reported algorithmic trading shares depend on how algorithmic activity is defined and measured.
- Broker execution tools and routing can be counted alongside fully automated trading.
- Regional differences do not by themselves show that firms in one region are more technologically advanced.
- Fragmentation comparisons may vary across asset classes and market segments.
Tags
Full text
# Why does algorithmic trading account for a significantly higher percentage of trades in the USA than in Europe or Asia? # Why does algorithmic trading account for a significantly higher percentage of trades in the USA than in Europe or Asia? I saw this study Why does algorithmic trading account for a significantly higher percentage of trades in the USA than in Europe or Asia? Is that because US-based exchanges offer more edge to high-frequency trading such as co-location? Is that because financial firms are more technologically advanced in the US than in Europe or Asia? Or some other reasons? ## Answer by madilyn (score 9) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/34543 > Why does algorithmic trading account for a significantly higher percentage of trades in the USA than in Europe or Asia? One of the major reasons for this is the significant fragmentation in the U.S. markets, and in particular the U.S equity markets where I believe Aite Group's data (in your picture) comes from. This doesn't necessarily provide an edge to algorithmic trading firms, but the more products are fungible and trade on an arbitrage basis, the more opportunities exist for naive algorithmic trading. You'll see the same behavior even in non-fragmented markets when you compare, say, more fungible products such as equity indices, to agricultural products. Another major reason is that "algorithmic trading" is loosely defined because it is often difficult to identify volume coming from a black box vs discretionary flow via a smart order router or algorithmic execution desk. Since U.S. markets dominate investor interest and volume across the globe, you'll commonly see that broker-dealers and vendors offer many more services and products for electronic access in the U.S. than in non-U.S. markets. This effect is clear even in the well-known bulge bracket banks. As a result, this difference can also be explained by the availability of such services. Your questions implicitly suggest that a higher % of algorithmic trading activity is related in some way to the amount of opportunity. I'd be careful of that type of reasoning. The markets are very efficient, even when it comes to business decisions. If it comes down to an advantage so obvious as cheaper colocation services in the U.S., the exchanges and data centers in Europe or Asia could easily court the same business by lowering their prices. > Is that because financial firms are more technologically advanced in the US than in Europe or Asia? No. The largest participants in the U.S. markets are generally the same as the ones in European markets. This is a highly globalized industry and it's easy for a U.S.-based firm to trade outside of the U.S. ## Answer by prop (score -3) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/34571 Euro equities are much more fragmented than the US
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.