Why Arithmetic Asian Options Resist a Heat Equation Transformation
Summary
The document asks whether the Black–Scholes partial differential equation for a continuously sampled arithmetic-average Asian option can be transformed into a heat equation. Its answer argues that the added average-state term makes the problem harder than the vanilla European option case, because arithmetic sums of lognormal asset values do not themselves have a lognormal distribution. It links this difficulty to the integrated geometric Brownian motion and Bessel-process literature, while noting that no simple analytic transformation is given for the relevant distribution parameters.
The discussion points to numerical methods and approximations, including moment matching that treats the sum as approximately lognormal. It also notes that unconditional expectations can be tractable under risk-neutral valuation. These are explanatory observations rather than a derivation or a tested pricing procedure; the answer offers intuition about convexity and Jensen effects but does not establish a general closed-form solution.
Key ideas
- Arithmetic averages of lognormal asset values generally lack a lognormal distribution.
- The Asian option equation includes an additional state variable for the running average.
- Numerical methods and approximate lognormal moment matching are possible approaches.
- The discussion gives intuition but no complete transformation or pricing derivation.
Tags
Full text
# Answer by David Addison (score 1, accepted)
# Is it possible to transform arithmetic-average strike continuous sampling Asian Black-Scholes equation to a heat equation?
By Transformation from the Black-Scholes differential equation to the diffusion equation - and back, we are able to transform vanilla European option into a heat equation.
And we know that the arithmetic-average strike continuous sampling Asian Black-Scholes equation is $$\frac{\partial V}{\partial t} +\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2S^2\frac{\partial ^2 V}{\partial S^2} +rS\frac{\partial V}{\partial S} + S\frac{\partial V}{\partial J}- rV=0$$ i.e., only one more term $S\frac{\partial V}{\partial J}$ compared with original BS equation.
Since this equation is similar to the original BS equation, I assume that we can transform it into a heat equation. Am I correct?
## Answer by David Addison (score 1, accepted)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/46402
This is an interesting question. On face value, I don't think it will transform into the heat equation because if it could, someone would've already done it, thereby solving the century old problem of the sums/averages of lognormals. But that's not a strong argument.
A few notes:
- Regular Brownian Motion is normally distributed. The sums/averages of normal distributions are normally distributed.
- Geometric Brownian Motion is lognormally distributed. The sums/averages of lognormals are not lognormally distributed.
- Rather, the sums (or equally, the arithmetic averages) of lognormally distributed variables is believed to result in a Bessel process - known as the Integrated Geometric Brownian Motion (wrt time) - that converges to an inverse gamma distribution. This has been studied extensively (Yor and Geman. Bessel Processes, Asian Options, and Perpetuities. 1993) (Daniel Dufresne. Sums of Lognormals. 200)(Daniel Dufresne, Bessel Processes and Asian Options. 2005) However, no known analytic transformation exists for deriving the parameters of this distribution. Rather, they are typically evaluated using numerical methods or approximations.
- Many approximations (e.g., Fenton-Wilkinson moment matching method) rely on the observation that the sums/average of lognormal distributions resemble a lognormal distribution.
- The exception to the above applies when taking the unconditional expectation of the time integral since randomness is non-consequential to the expected value (needed for risk neutral assumption regardless).
Intuitively, the extra term $S\frac{\partial V}{\partial J}$ is responsible for convexity errors terms which are analogous to Jensen's inequality. Ito's lemma is able to account for these errors by adding the term $\frac{\sigma^2}{2}t$ to GBM. The issue, though, is finding a transformation of variables a known distribution. This will probably be solved sometime in my lifetime.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.