Why Delta-Gamma and Delta-Vega Hedges Can Match Under Flat Volatility
Summary
This example compares delta-gamma and delta-vega hedging for a short call using another call and shares. It gives Black-Scholes Greeks for an in-the-money call and an at-the-money call, then solves for the option quantity that offsets gamma or vega and the share quantity that removes delta. With the stated flat-volatility setup, the same option ratio satisfies either second Greek constraint, so the resulting delta hedge also matches.
The explanation is that, under a flat implied-volatility assumption, vega is proportional to gamma for options on the same underlying, linking gamma neutrality to vega neutrality. The answer cautions that this relationship generally does not carry over unchanged when the volatility surface has a strike skew. In that setting, local neutrality choices can differ and can shift as spot, time, and volatility change. The example is a local model illustration, not a claim that such hedges remain neutral through market moves or that its ratios apply across arbitrary options.
Key ideas
- The example hedges a short call with an at-the-money call and shares.
- Under the stated flat-volatility assumptions, the option ratio that neutralizes gamma also neutralizes vega.
- Shares adjust delta but contribute neither gamma nor vega in the example.
- A volatility skew can break the simple relationship between gamma and vega exposures.
- The hedge is local and can change as spot, time, or volatility moves.
Tags
Full text
# Delta-Gamma neutral vs Delta-Vega neutral # Delta-Gamma neutral vs Delta-Vega neutral Imagine that the underlying stock price is 110. The call option has a strike price of 100. The annualized volatility is 25% and the interest rate is 10%. Finally, the time to maturity is 0.5 years. We sell this call option and we want to hedge it. According to the Black-Scholes model, this option has a delta of 0.819, a gamma of 0.014 and a vega of 0.205. For a delta-gamma neutral portfolio, we need another option and shares. Imagine we have the same call option but with a strike price of 110 (ATM), which has a delta of 0.644, a gamma of 0.019 and a vega of 0.290. Shares have a delta of 1 and gamma of 0. For the portfolio to be gamma-neutral: $$-1 * 0.014 + NrShares * 0 + NrATMoptions * 0.019 = 0$$ This results in 0.737 ATM call options. Then we make it delta-neutral: $$-1 * 0.819 + NrShares * 1 + 0.737 * 0.644 = 0$$ This gives 0.344 shares. Now we want a delta-vega neutral portfolio. Therefore, we use the same ATM option. $$-1 * 0.205 + NrShares * 0 + NrATMoptions * 0.290 = 0$$ This gives the same number (if we do not round the delta, gamma, vega) of ATM call options and shares as the delta-gamma neutral hedge portfolio. Does it mean that if we want a delta-gamma or a delta-vega neutral portfolio, we need exactly the same amount or am I doing something wrong? ## Answer by Newquant (score 1) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/74863 For a flat IV skew (not surface), the gamma neutral portfolio == the vega neutral portfolio. This is because Vega = s^2 * σ * T * gamma, so when the net gamma exposure is 0, the net vega exposure is 0, and so is the net theta exposure. When there is a skew present, portfolio's can be constructed that are locally gamma, vega, or theta neutral. In the gamma/theta cases, these represent local arbitrages of long gamma or theta (long gamma without theta risk, and vice versa). These quickly change as the higher order greeks take effect through time/spot/vol. In your case, yes. You need the same ratio of options to achieve gamma, vega, or theta neutrality. But in the real world this rarely holds because of skew.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.