Skip to content
All library documents

Why Floating-Rate Bonds Can Trade at Par

Article Quant Q&A · Author: user54908

Summary

The document clarifies a statement that a coupon bond has par value when its coupon rate matches the corresponding swap rate. In this context, par means that the instrument’s fair value equals the face value of its remaining principal repayments. For a floating-rate note or floating leg paying the reference rate without a spread, projected coupons and discounted principal cash flows offset so that the instrument is valued at that principal amount when both are valued from the same swap curve.

The answer explains the offset intuitively: a rise in rates lowers the present value of principal, while the floating coupons reset higher; a fall in rates has the opposite effect. It qualifies the result when a coupon is fixed in advance: during a coupon period, that coupon no longer adjusts to current rates, so the value can move away from par. The equality applies at coupon reset dates under the stated curve and cash-flow assumptions, and the instrument may repay principal in installments rather than only at maturity. The discussion is conceptual and provides no numerical example.

Key ideas

  • Here, par means fair value equal to the face amount of remaining principal repayments.
  • A floating coupon can offset changes in the present value of principal when both are valued from the same curve.
  • The par relationship applies to a floating-rate instrument paying the reference rate without an added spread.
  • A coupon fixed in advance can cause the instrument’s value to deviate from par between reset dates.
  • The principal may be amortized through multiple repayments rather than paid only at maturity.

Tags

Full text
# What does it mean for a coupon bond to have "par value"?


# What does it mean for a coupon bond to have "par value"?












I am doing the Interest Rate Models course on Coursera. In the third lecture of the second week, the lecturer provides this lemma:

> Lemma 1 A coupon bond has par value at $T_0$ if and only if its coupon rates equal the corresponding swap rate: $$1 = \sum_{i=1}^n P(T_0, T_i)\delta R_{\text{swap}}(T_0)+P(T_0, T_n)\text{.}$$ Proof Exercise.

My question is what does "par value" mean in this Lemma? I did a google search of par value, and I got this definition from Investopedia:

> Par value, also known as nominal value, is the face value of a bond or the stock value stated in the corporate charter.

The definition above makes it sound like all coupon bonds would have a par value, although that par value might be $0$. I don't know what that par value would have to do with the coupon rate. It seems to me that it would only make sense to say something like

> A coupon bond has par value $X$ at $T_0\ldots$

so I am not sure what the claim is in the provided Lemma. What does "par value" mean here?

## Answer by Dimitri Vulis (score 1, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/64181

Sloppy English + no editor.

The lemma really says that if you calculate the fair value of an instrument (FRN, or a floating leg of an interest rate swap..) that pays LIBOR (no spread added to it) by projecting the floating coupon cash flows using swap curve and discounting all the cash flows (coupons and principal) using the same curve, then this fair value is equal to the undiscounted face value of the remaining principal repayments.

The present value of the projected coupons is exactly the difference between the face value of the remaining principal repayments minus the present value of the principal discounted using the swap curve.

When swap rates go up (down), then the present value of your principal repayments will go down (up), but the coupon amount changes exactly to offset the change in the present value of the principal.

However if the coupon is being set in advance, as usually done with LIBOR, then all this is not quite true in the middle of a coupon period - only at the beginning of coupon period. Once current coupon effectively becomes fixed, the instrument's price can deviate a little from par as the short-term rates moves. Related question: Why does the valuation of the floating leg of a swap only use the next payment?

Note that the instrument can be amortizing. There's no need to assume that all the principal is repaid only at maturity.

## Answer by Edward Watson (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/64109

Par value is the principal payment made at maturity, versus present value which is essentially the price.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.