Why FX Forwards Trade OTC While Futures Use Standardized Exchanges
Summary
The document compares over-the-counter FX forwards with exchange-traded futures, explaining why customers and banks may use the OTC market. Forwards can be tailored to a customer’s currency, amount, and delivery date, while listed futures use standardized contract sizes and dates and may not cover every currency. OTC access can also be easier for firms that already bank with a dealer but lack futures trading accounts. Greater interbank volume can reinforce liquidity and attract further activity.
The discussion also describes the operational and collateral tradeoffs. A bank can arrange a customer-specific forward and hedge it in the cash market, while exchange-traded contracts require standardized terms and collateral from market participants. One answer notes that changing collateral rules can affect banks’ incentives. These are broad explanations from a short discussion, not a comprehensive market study; product availability, regulation, liquidity, and customer access vary across markets and over time.
Key ideas
- Exchange-listed futures require standardized contract terms, while forwards can be tailored to customers.
- Forward flexibility includes the currency, notional amount, and delivery date.
- Existing bank relationships can make OTC trading more accessible to some firms.
- High interbank volume can support liquidity and reinforce OTC market activity.
- Collateral requirements and regulation can shape banks’ preference for OTC or listed trading.
Tags
Full text
# Why forwards are not traded in exchange market? # Why forwards are not traded in exchange market? Why they are only traded OTC ? And why in general derivatives are all traded only OTC ? Why do banks prefer to trade OTC rather than exchange market ? ## Answer by nbbo2 (score 3) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/57921 The competition between FX forwards (interbank) and FX Futures (Exchange traded) has so far resulted in much more trading done with banks. The reasons for this (from the customers point of view) are: - The interbank market is highly flexible as to currencies, delivery dates and amounts (basically whatever the customer wants), whereas the futures trade for a limited set of delivery dates (for the EuroFX futures: one per month for the next approx 6 months https://www.cmegroup.com/trading/fx/g10/euro-fx_quotes_globex.html, and the amount has to be a multiple of 125,000 EUR). And minor currencies are not available as Futures at all. (Note that the "standardization" is a disadvantage if the customer wants (for ex.) 200,000 EUR on a different date than the third Wednesday of the month (the standard delivery date for EuroFX futures). Put differently, the flexibility is a big advantage for the banks). - Many companies do not have an account that can trade futures, but they generally have a relationship with a bank (which, even if it does not trade FX can introduce them to another bank that does). - The volume is larger Interbank so there is more liquidity there and that tends to attract more customers (feedback loop). This is very difficult to change. ## Answer by JoshK (score 2) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/57919 Futures are the exchange-traded equivalent of forwards. For something to trade listed you need to have a standardized contract. A forward is usually quoted as a rate reference to execution. For example: Customer: "Quote me an SPX forward for 180 days." Bank: "1.0123 x 1.01234" Customer: "I lift you for 20k units, vwap over 10 minutes starting now." The bank will then trade the cash equivalent and write and OTC forward to the customer. The price of the forward will be 1.01234 x Banks (used to) prefer OTC because the bank collects margin from customers and gives them nothing. Under the new rules banks sometimes have to give customers collateral, so it's not as good anymore. With listed/exchange trades everyone has to deliver collateral. Also - I think the other poster had a good point. Some customers just can't trade listed in many markets. A lot of times you have non US clients who want US access. It's just easier to deal with a bank directly in that case. (Although there are many clients who have the ability to trade listed and don't have ISDA's - so it does go both ways)
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.