Why Girsanov Changes Drift but Not Volatility Between Equivalent Measures
Summary
The question asks how to change measure for a diffusion when both its drift and volatility differ. The replies give conflicting claims: one says that differing volatilities make the probability measures singular, while another says a general compatible change of measure can include volatility changes. The more developed explanation emphasizes quadratic variation: the volatility of an Itô process can be inferred from its sample paths and is invariant under an equivalent change of measure. In the usual setting, Girsanov changes the drift while preserving the diffusion coefficient.
The thread points toward the key limitation of the drift-change Radon–Nikodym formula shown in the question: it does not provide a way to replace one diffusion coefficient with a different one while retaining equivalent measures. However, the answer does not reconcile the conflicting replies, state precise assumptions, or give a full theorem or derivation. Readers should treat its broad statements as an introductory distinction and consult a rigorous stochastic-calculus treatment for model-specific conditions.
Key ideas
- Girsanov’s standard change of measure modifies drift while preserving the diffusion coefficient.
- Quadratic variation reveals pathwise volatility and is invariant under equivalent measures.
- Different volatility specifications can imply singular rather than equivalent measures in the usual diffusion setting.
- The thread contains conflicting replies and does not give a complete theorem or assumptions.
Tags
Full text
# Version of Girsanov theorem with changing volatility
# Version of Girsanov theorem with changing volatility
Is there a version of Girsanov theorem when the volatility is changing?
For example Girsanov theorem states that Radon Nikodym (RN) derivative for a stochastic equation is used to transform the expectation where the sampling is done in one mesaure to an expectation where sampling is done in another measure.
Let's see an example
$dX_t(w) = f(X_t(w))dt + \sigma(X_t(w))dW_t^P(w)$ in P measure.
In P* measure, drift is $f^{*}(X_t(w))$. We multiply the internals of expectation in P measure with RN derivative to get expectation of X in P* measure
$E^{P^*}[X] = E^P[X \frac{dP^*}{dP}]$
where
$\frac{dP^*}{dP}=e^{-0.5 \int (\frac{ f^{*}(X_s(w)) - f(X_s(w))}{\sigma(X_s(w))})^2ds + \int \frac{ f*(X_s(w)) - f(X_s(w))}{\sigma(X_s(w))} dW_s^P(w)}$
What I am looking for is in P* measure, not only drift but also the volatility changes
$dX_t(w) = f^{*}(X_t(w))dt + \sigma^{*}(X_t(w))dW_t^P(w)$
Then what is $\frac{dP^*}{dP}$?
## Answer by wsw (score 6)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/4705
I don't think Girsanov's formula works when the volatilities are different between the P measure and P* measure. P and P* will be singular with respect to each other.
Please see Prof. Goodman's class notes on page 11 at http://www.math.nyu.edu/faculty/goodman/teaching/StochCalc2012/notes/Week10.pdf .
Also, from [ http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/sloan-school-of-management/15-450-analytics-of-finance-fall-2010/lecture-notes/MIT15_450F10_lec02.pdf ] page 54:
> a probability measure assigns relative likelihood to different trajectories of the Brownian motion. Variance of the Ito process can be recovered from the shape of a single trajectory (quadratic variation), so it does not depend on the relative likelihood of the trajectories, hence, does not depend on the choice of the probability measure.
## Answer by Brian B (score 0)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/4519
The Girsanov theorem applies to any compatible change of measure, including a volatility change. The version you have written above is a simplified version for drift changes only, but if you look in any good stochastic calculus book, you will see that full version just requires that you be able to compute the cross-variation of the two processes.
## Answer by athos (score 0)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/69008
Pls check Shreve‘s Theorem 9.2.2 Change of risk-neutral measure . Is this what you are looking for?Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.