Skip to content
All library documents

Why Higher Interest Rates Can Raise a Call Option’s Rho

Article Quant Q&A · Author: financenoob

Summary

The document addresses why a call option’s price can rise as interest rates increase, even though higher rates may weigh on stock prices. Its central point is that an option’s no-arbitrage value is constrained by the ability to replicate its payoff through dynamic trading, or equivalently by risk-neutral pricing. Views about how interest rates might affect future stock prices do not by themselves determine today’s option price.

To illustrate the direction of rho, the accepted answer considers a no-volatility case with an in-the-money call. The option value reduces to the stock price less the discounted strike, so a higher rate lowers the present value of the strike and raises the call value. The answer also cautions that rho’s sign can differ for other payoffs, which may require modeling rates and equity jointly. The illustration is conceptual and does not cover the full set of assumptions or market effects in practical pricing.

Key ideas

  • A replicating strategy constrains an option’s price under no-arbitrage reasoning.
  • Risk-neutral pricing, rather than investor forecasts alone, explains the option’s current value.
  • For an in-the-money call in the stated zero-volatility case, higher rates reduce the present value of the strike.
  • Rho can have a different sign for other payoffs, potentially requiring a joint equity-rate model.

Tags

Full text
# Why does the price of an option increase with increasing Rho?


# Why does the price of an option increase with increasing Rho?












I was wondering why the price of an option increases with Rho (price change for a derivative relative to a change in the risk-free rate of interest). I found this explanation on a website:

"Each standard equity options contract represents 100 shares of the underlying stock. Because it’s much cheaper to buy a call options contract than it is to buy 100 shares of stock, call buyers are willing to pay more for call options when rates are relatively high because they can invest the difference. A call seller, on the other hand, would want additional incentive to sell a call option (versus selling the stock outright) if interest rates are high in order to compensate for forgoing the cash from the stock sale. In other words, the higher call options premium when interest rates are high is the “opportunity cost” of forgone interest. "

This makes sense, however, this contradicts in my opinion the knowledge that:

- Higher interest rates tend to negatively affect stock prices

- (Call) Option price decreases with decreases stock price (how much depends on Delta)

So shouldn't the (call) option price go down with increasing interest rates?

Can someone give me more insights? Thanks!

## Answer by Arshdeep (score 2, accepted)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/64173

Your arguments, though correct, have no implication on option price because they are facts about how the market would behave in the future. However, the fact that the option can be replicated today by a dynamic strategy all but constrains the option price, so that real world probabilities/opinions on what would happen have no way to influence the market price.

See this answer for why real world speculation does not matter. All analysis therefore should somehow rest on the argument that the option can be replicated, and this replication controls the price. Equivalently, one can analyse risk neutral dynamics.

Coming to the direction of price change. Let's see what happens in the degenerate case where there's no stock price volatility. Assume that the strike is sufficiently low so that the option is ITM. In this case, price of the option is $S-K*exp(-rt)$, which increases with rates.

Note: If I change the payoff to something else, say $Max(0,S-K*exp(2rt))$, the sign of rho might be different. Infact this thing should be treated as an equity-rates hybrid, with a 2 factor model.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.