Why Market-Making Funds May Become Stand-Alone Firms
Summary
The document explains why a fund that specializes in market making may later operate as an independent business. It identifies Citadel as an example of a firm engaged in market making and describes the activity as potentially profitable on a risk-adjusted basis while requiring relatively little capital.
The proposed transition is that owners may return outside investors’ capital after building profits, then continue market making as a stand-alone firm. The discussion is brief and offers no detailed evidence, comparison of business structures, or analysis of the risks and costs involved. Its explanation is a general observation rather than a guide to evaluating a particular fund.
Key ideas
- Market making can be conducted by firms that began as funds.
- The discussion names Citadel as an example of a market-making firm.
- Market making is described as relatively low in capital requirements and potentially attractive on a risk-adjusted basis.
- Fund owners may return outside capital and continue operating as a stand-alone business.
Tags
Full text
# Is there any funds that do market making? # Is there any funds that do market making? In spite of banks, market making firms, brokers is there any funds that specially do market making? ## Answer by Chris (score 2) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/46614 Of course, Citadel as a primary example. ## Answer by Chris Taylor (score 1) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/46612 Yes, although they might not remain funds for very long. Market making is not a particularly capital intensive activity, and it can be quite profitable (or at least, rather risk-adjusted returns are high) so once the fund owners have accumulated some profit they will be incentivised to return outside capital and operate as a stand-alone business.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.