Why Option Strike Premium Differences Do Not Equal Exercise Probabilities
Summary
This question asks whether the difference in premiums between nearby options of the same type and expiry must be at least the farther-strike option’s exercise probability multiplied by the contract multiplier. It uses put options as an example and interprets the Black–Scholes–Merton value N(−d2) as the probability of exercise. The proposed inequality treats that probability as a lower bound on the premium difference.
The document does not provide an answer or supporting analysis, so the claim remains unresolved. In particular, it does not distinguish risk-neutral exercise probabilities from option price sensitivities, or account for the strike spacing and payoff profile that determine how prices vary across strikes. It is therefore a useful question about interpreting the BSM formula, but not a validated arbitrage rule or pricing method.
Key ideas
- The question proposes linking adjacent option premium differences to the farther-strike option’s exercise probability.
- It interprets N(−d2) as a put exercise probability under the BSM model.
- The document provides no derivation or answer to establish the proposed inequality.
- Exercise probability alone does not specify the premium difference across strikes.
Tags
Full text
# Options Arbitrage # Options Arbitrage I have a basic question regarding the BSM formula, would be thankful for any assistance. As far as I understand $N(d2)$ and $N(-d2)$ stand for the probability of a Call and Put respectively being exercised. If so, isn't it the case that two adjacent same type options with the same expiry must have a difference in premiums of at least the farther strike's exercisable probability times the Multiplier of the contract? For example: Option Type - Put Strike $X - N(-d2) \geq 0.4$ Strike $Y - N(-d2) \geq 0.3$ Option Multiplier - 100 In general, isn;t it the case that: X Premium $\geq Y Premium + Y \cdot N(-d2) *$ Multiplier
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.