Skip to content
All library documents

Why Portfolio IRR Must Be Recomputed from Combined Cash Flows

Article Quant Q&A · Author: Balamurugan P

Summary

The document asks how to summarize the internal rates of return of multiple investments. It compares averaging individual IRRs, weighting them by net present values or initial investment, and calculating an IRR from the investments' combined cash flows. The proposed portfolio-level method is to add cash flows period by period and solve for the IRR of that accumulated series.

Examples show that the combined-cash-flow IRR differs from the arithmetic mean and from weighted averages using the cited weights. The underlying reason is that each project's IRR solves an equation determined by its own dated cash flows; combining projects creates a new cash-flow equation that must be solved separately. The examples illustrate this point, but the resulting IRR depends on the timing and scale of the cash flows, and IRR itself can have limitations for comparing investments.

Key ideas

  • To find the IRR of investments undertaken together, combine their cash flows by period and solve for a new IRR.
  • The combined IRR generally differs from the mean of individual IRRs.
  • Weighting individual IRRs by net present value or initial investment does not generally reproduce the combined-cash-flow IRR.
  • Each project's IRR is tied to its own cash-flow sequence, so there is no general shortcut for aggregating the rates.

Tags

Full text
# IRR of IRR or weighted average of IRR


# IRR of IRR or weighted average of IRR












I have a list of investments with their expected IRR(Internal Rate of Return). I'm confused about which is the right metric to depict for my population: IRR of IRR or weighted average of IRR. It's tough to understand which is needed when. Can someone help? I'm not even sure what to term the IRR of all my individual IRRs?

## Answer by Robert (score 1)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/28374

You could add the cash flows (CF) by period and then compute the IRR for that accumulated cash flow (CCF). The resultant IRR will be like a weighted IRR. That will be different from IRR weighted by NPVs or Initial investment of each investment.

Let say you have two investments with this CFs:

```
       [0]  [1]  [2]  [3]  [4]  [5]  [6]
Inv1 -1560  200 1300  800   NA   NA   NA
Inv2 -1560  200 1300  800   NA   NA 1600
```

With a 25% discount rate you will have the NPVs and IRRs:

```
          NPVs      IRRs
Inv1 -158.4000 0.1902671
Inv2  261.0304 0.3164824
```

The accumulated cash flow will be:

```
       [0]   [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   [6]
CCF  -3120   400  2600  1600     0     0  1600
```

You can verify that the total NPV is equal to the NPV of CCF at the same discount rate: `102.6304`. Nothing new, this is one of the properties of NPV rule.

You could also compute the IRR of the CCF: `0.2652826`, that will be the IRR of your investments.

That rate is different from the mean of IRRs (`0.2533748`), and from the weighted IRR using as weights the NPVs (`0.5112835`) or the initial investments (`0.2533748`).

Lets change the investment 1 to:

```
       [0]  [1]  [2]  [3]  [4]  [5]  [6]
Inv1 -2560  200 3300 1800   NA   NA   NA
Inv2 -1560  200 1300  800   NA   NA 1600
```

Then the NPVs and IRRs

```
         NPVs      IRRs
Inv1 633.6000 0.3806551
Inv2 261.0304 0.316482
```

The CCF

```
       [0]   [1]   [2]   [3]   [4]   [5]   [6]
CCF  -4120   400  4600  2600     0     0  1600
```

Then the IRR of the CCF: `0.3528677`. Again different from the mean of IRRs (`0.3485688`), and from the weighted IRR using as weights the NPVs (`0.3619311`) or the initial investments (`0.3563567`).

## Answer by nbbo2 (score 0)

https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/28375

Each IRR is the [or rather a] solution of a polynomial equation, whose coefficients are the cash flows of the specific projects.

If all the projects are carried out at the same time, the cash flows from combining the projects form the coefficients of a new polynomial.

This overall polynomial equation must be solved from scratch to find the IRR of the overall project. There are AFAIK no "shortcuts" such as as adding or weighing the solutions (IRRs) of the subprojects. It is a whole new IRR problem that must be solved from scratch.

Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)

This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.