Why Stochastic Volatility Markets Are Incomplete
Summary
The document sketches why a market with stochastic volatility may be incomplete when volatility risk is driven by an independent source of randomness that cannot be traded directly. In a one-stock setting, changing the risk premium associated with the volatility Brownian motion can preserve the stock’s martingale property while changing the distribution of future volatility and therefore the values of some claims on the stock.
A second argument expresses this through the number of Brownian risk sources and traded risky assets: when there are more independent sources than assets, the equation for the market price of risk can have multiple solutions, yielding multiple equivalent martingale measures, subject to suitable integrability conditions. The discussion also cites a paper treating a bivariate diffusion and mentions Heston’s option-pricing work. These are proof sketches, not a full formal treatment; assumptions about admissibility, filtration, rank, and measure-change validity matter.
Key ideas
- An untraded volatility risk source can change claim values without changing the traded stock’s martingale property.
- Different equivalent martingale measures imply that not every contingent claim has a unique price.
- More Brownian risk sources than traded risky assets can create multiple market prices of risk.
- The argument relies on conditions such as integrability and appropriate volatility dynamics.
- The cited discussion offers sketches and references rather than a complete proof for every stochastic volatility model.
Tags
Full text
# How to prove that markets are incomplete under the Stochastic Volatility model?
# How to prove that markets are incomplete under the Stochastic Volatility model?
Has anyone ever formally proved that Markets are incomplete under the stochastic volatility model?
I know that if there are more random sources than traded assets, then the market is incomplete but does there exist a proof of that meta-fact?
If there is, could you please give me the reference to the paper(s)?
## Answer by hjs (score 6)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10496
It's really quite simple. It's just a matter of the fact that we can change measure on the stochastic volatility while not changing the fact that the stock is a martingale. Once we can do this, we have payoffs that have different values under different measures, so the market can't be complete.
For clarity, just consider a stock S, a money market account M and a Brownian motions B and W. Let dS = a dt + v dB, dM = r dt, and dv = b dt + w dW, where our filtration is generated by B and W, and a, r, b, and w are adapted processes. Using M as numeraire (i.e. - divide by M so as to express all prices in terms of shares of M or equivalently, assuming interest rates are zero), then under an equivalent martingale measure, assets and admissible strategies are martingales, so now S is a martingale, so dS' = v' dB', and dv' = b' dt + w' dW'.
The point is we can change measure to add a drift to W. Since dS' = v' dB', this doesn't change the fact that S' has zero drift, so S' remains a martingale. But it does change the distribution of v', and thus the distribution of S'.
If the market was complete, all contingent claims on S would be replicable. Their prices would be equal to the initial value of the replicating strategy, and hence fixed. However, since the distribution of S' changes when we change the drift of W, there are contingent claims on S which will have different values depending on the drift we add to W. Hence the market is incomplete.
## Answer by AFK (score 3)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10483
I think a sketch of the proof would look like this
Let's say you start from $$ dS_t = S_t \odot (\mu_t dt + \sigma_t dW_t) $$ where $S$ is an vector valued process of your $n$ risky assets prices, $W$ a standard $k$-dimensionnal brownian motion under the historic probability, $\sigma_t$ an $n \times k$ matrix valued process and $\odot$ is the Hadamard coordinate by coordinate product of vectors. Add $S^0_t = e^{\int_0^t r_u du}$ the cash (risk free asset).
A risk premium process $\lambda$ is a solution of $\sigma_t\lambda_t = \mu_t - r_t \mathbf 1$ (with $\mathbf 1$ the $n$-dimensional vector of $1$'s). For each such solution you get a risk neutral probability $\mathbb{Q}^\lambda|_{\mathcal{F}_t} = \exp( - \int_0^t \lambda_s dW_s - \frac{1}{2} \int_0^t |\lambda_s|^2 ds) \mathbb{P}|_{\mathcal{F}_t}$. Indeed you can write $$ dS_t = S_t \odot ( r_t \mathbf 1 dt + \sigma_t (\underbrace{dW_t + \lambda_t dt}_{dW^\lambda_t}) ) $$ and Girsanov theorem tells you that $dW_t + \lambda_t dt$ is a $\mathbb{Q}^\lambda$-brownian motion. So $S/S^0$ is a local martingale under $\mathbb{Q}^\lambda$ (for the historic brownian filtration).
If $k> n$ (for exemple $k=2$ and $n= 1$ in the Heston model) and $\sigma_t$ is of full rank then you get an infinite number of risk premiums so you have an infinite number of risk neutral probability measures so your market is incomplete.
I guess the devil is in the details like the integrability condition for $\lambda$ to actually define a probability measure but I think that's the basic idea.
## Answer by pbr142 (score 2)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10462
The paper by Marc Romano and Nizar Touzi, Section 3, contains a general proof that a stochastic volatility model cannot be complete in the sense that the addition of the option completes the market (in the sense of Harrison and Pliska) generated by the underlying and risk-free borrowing/lending: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.407.6122&rep=rep1&type=pdf
The paper only deals with a bivariate diffusion with correlated Wiener noise.
## Answer by FreshF (score 1)
https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10151
You can have a look at Heston (1993) who gives a closed form solution for options under stochastic volatility.
http://rfs.oxfordjournals.org/content/6/2/327.short
Keep in mind that an investor demands extra compensation for volatility risk. Breeden's consumption based model offers a way of determining this premium. When calibrating a stochastic volatility model those extra premiums are already contained in market prices.Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.