Why Ten-Year Government Bond Returns Are Not Monthly Risk-Free Rates
Summary
The document asks whether monthly returns on a ten-year government bond can stand in for a monthly risk-free return, assuming sovereign default risk is ignored. The answers largely reject that proxy, emphasizing the mismatch between a long-maturity bond return and a short monthly risk-free rate. One response suggests dividing an annualized Treasury bill rate by twelve as a simple monthly conversion, giving a historical illustration.
The discussion offers little supporting explanation or a consistent calculation method: other answers simply point to external references or state that the bond proxy is unsuitable. Dividing an annual rate by twelve is only an approximation and presumes a compatible annualized quote and compounding convention. The exchange does not specify the relevant market, currency, or exact risk-free instrument, so selecting an appropriate short-term rate depends on the use case.
Key ideas
- A ten-year government bond’s monthly return is not equivalent to a one-month risk-free rate.
- The replies favor a short-term Treasury bill rate over a long-duration bond return.
- Dividing an annualized bill rate by twelve is offered as a rough monthly conversion.
- The discussion does not specify a market, currency, or compounding convention.
Tags
Full text
# Given monthly returns of 10-Year Govt Bond, how to get monthly risk free rate of return # Given monthly returns of 10-Year Govt Bond, how to get monthly risk free rate of return I have a list of monthly returns of a 10 year Govt Bond. I am not sure if this is a good proxy for the monthly risk free rate of return. Can somebody suggest how I can derive the monthly risk free rate of return from this monthly return of Govt Bonds. Ofcourse, this is just a simple case. I don't want to take in account any default probabilities of the Govt (Sovereign risk etc). Simple put is the monthly return of a 10 Year Govt bond a good proxy for risk free rate over a month? ## Answer by Richi Wa (score 4) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/9608 I would answer your question with no. So two times no. A small "no" for taking government rates for the risk free rate and a big "no" for taking the 10 year rate for a monthly rate. ## Answer by ana (score 0) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10425 jup, just devide it through 12 :) Example /between 2004-2008): Average annualized T.Bill rate =3,27% Monthly Riskfree rate = 3,27%/12 = 0,272% ## Answer by Aksakal almost surely binary (score 0) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/10426 here's your answer basically, I'm saying NO, it's not a good proxy at all
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.