Why USD LIBOR Became a Benchmark for Dollar Instruments
Article Quant Q&A · Author: bonCodigo
Summary
USD LIBOR refers to the rate at which banks active in the London money market estimated they could borrow unsecured funds in US dollars. Its relevance to dollar instruments comes from the international market for dollar funding: banks can borrow or lend dollars in multiple financial centers, so the benchmark’s location does not make it a measure of London-only or UK borrowing costs. The panel included banks based in several countries, reflecting the breadth of that market.
The document also explains why LIBOR’s role was being questioned. Rate-setting scandals, changes in central-bank policy and money-market dynamics, and uncertainty about whether LIBOR spreads reflected bank credit risk all weakened confidence in it. It describes the use of LIBOR-based curves with added spreads and discussion of overnight indexed swap rates as alternatives. Existing contracts and products tied to LIBOR meant any transition would take time; the account reflects the concerns and market context presented in the source, rather than current benchmark arrangements.
Key ideas
- USD LIBOR measured estimated unsecured dollar borrowing costs among banks active in the London money market.
- The benchmark’s relevance came from the international reach of dollar funding, not the banks’ headquarters or the currency’s country of origin.
- Scandals and changing money-market conditions raised questions about LIBOR’s reliability as a funding-risk measure.
- OIS rates were discussed as a possible alternative curve input, while legacy contracts made transition gradual.
Tags
Full text
# Why is USD LIBOR used for USD denominated securities? # Why is USD LIBOR used for USD denominated securities? I am just starting on Interest Rate Swaps & curve construction. While reading few materials on Interest Rate Swap, it's indicated for e.g. "Floating Coupon Index: 6 month USD LIBOR". LIBOR is the London Inter Bank Overnight Rate. How does it matter for USD? If a security is USD denominated, shouldn't it be valued using some USD based interest rate e.g. Treasury security rates? Why does USD based security valuation have to give a thing about what London Banks think? US still remains the largest bond market in the world...though. Even following link states USD LIBOR is what London banks prepared to lend $$$.00... It doesn't seem to stop there, as couple of other currencies have their LIBORs available as well. Why there has to be a USD LIBOR in the first place? - Reference: The US Dollar LIBOR interest rate is the average interbank interest rate at which a large number of banks on the London money market are prepared to lend one another unsecured funds denominated in US Dollars. The US Dollar (USD) LIBOR interest rate is available in 7 maturities, from overnight (on a daily basis) to 12 months. The US dollar LIBOR interest rate serves as a base rate for all sorts of other products such as savings accounts, mortgages and loans. Alongside the US Dollar LIBOR there are also LIBOR interest rates in 4 other currencies... ## Answer by Matt Wolf (score 7, accepted) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/11402 The importance here is that it actually does not matter in what time zone or market the libor rates are set. Key is that it is supposed (!!!) to be a gauge at what rate contributing banks could borrow funds at in the inter-bank market. Like you can go to any African country and borrow or lend US dollar, so can any Japanese, European, or American bank borrow and lend US dollar in either New York, London, or any other money center. London was chosen out of convenience because it has traditionally been accepted as a convenient time zone (vs Japan or the US) for international trade, such as currency exchange and for many international fixed income asset classes. The importance of Lie-bor has been greatly diminished due to the following, however: - Due to the most recent rate setting scandal - Because of the changes in dynamics in the money and rates market (a. increased market focus on IOER and RRP rates rather than fed fund target rate,and b. the Fed will possibly change its policy rate to RRP) - Because the current low spread of libor over top-tier CP begs a lot of questions as to whether libor adequately reflects the risk it is suppose to price (given historical context of the spread). The market right now scrambles at deciding whether this is the new normal or not. - Some research points to recommendations that OIS should not only be used as "risk-free rate" (this term imho should actually be removed from all textbooks) for collateralized portfolios but also uncollateralized ones, in effect replacing libor as curve input. The biggest change I see and hear fixed income traders talk about is the new ways curves are constructed. The point is that libor itself is of decreasing importance actually. It is the curves that result from adding certain spreads on top of libor curves that matter. If market consensus now shifts to sourcing different rates to construct the base curve then libor rate usage will be phased out gradually. But keep in mind that a huge amount of derivatives and outstanding rates and even credit products are still based on libor, hence this is not something that will change overnight. ## Answer by Michaël Le Barbier (score 10) https://quant.stackexchange.com/a/11401 > Why does USD based security valuation have to give a thing about what London Banks think? Your question is based on false premises: the USD Libor is not determined by polling London based banks as you seem to believe, but banks on the London money market. The difference is important, as there are—of course—banks which are not based in London and active on the London money market. The USD panel has the following members: - Bank of America - Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd - Barclays Bank plc - BNP Paribas - Citibank NA - Credit Agricole CIB - Credit Suisse - Deutsche Bank AG - HSBC - JP Morgan Chase - Lloyds Banking Group - Rabobank - Royal Bank of Canada - Société Générale - Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation - The Norinchukin Bank - The Royal Bank of Scotland Group - UBS AG If these banks are in the panel, one can assume that their activity on the London money market is particularly relevant for USD securities. As we see, many of them are neither based in London or the UK nor in the US.
Shown in full with attribution under the source's licence. Licence: CC BY-SA 4.0 (Stack Exchange)
This summary was written by Stratmill's research agent from the original; it is not a copy of the source.