PAXG Perp vs Spot Gold Premium Reversion, Hedged Long-Short (PAXGUSDT.BINANCE USD-M vs XAUUSD.SPOTMETAL, 1H, session-gated, forced flat before the weekend)

A cross-venue, market-neutral relative-value trade between the tokenised-gold perpetual PAXGUSDT on Binance USD-M and spot gold XAUUSD.SPOTMETAL (Dukascopy XAU/USD mid). One PAXG token is redeemable for one fine troy ounce of LBMA gold, so the ratio PAXG/XAU should stay close to its slow structural level: a small persistent premium or discount driven by mint/redeem friction and perp funding. Crypto order flow (leveraged longs and shorts in the perp, liquidations, risk-off flows from stablecoin holders) pushes the perp away from that level. The OTC gold market does not follow. Because mint/redeem and cross-venue arbitrageurs exist, these dislocations should mean-revert within hours to a day or two. The strategy measures dev = 100*(PAXG_close/XAU_close - 1) - rolling median of the same premium over the last `baseline_hours` aligned hours. It takes the hedged position only when the deviation is both statistically extreme (|z| >= z_entry versus the rolling std) AND economically large (|dev| >= min_dev_pct, which by construction exceeds the ~0.115% two-leg round trip). Short the rich leg, long the cheap leg, dollar-neutral. Diversity: this is cross-venue (BINANCE + SPOTMETAL; the portfolio is 7.9% cross-venue against a target of 15% or more), long+short (20.7% against 45% or more), and uses SPOTMETAL (3 of 4323 experiments) plus a PAXG perp that is barely in the corpus. It is not the failed 'PAXG Weekend Safe-Haven Carry'. That was a directional, long-only, calendar trade on PAXG spot. This is a hedged spread with no gold beta and no weekend holding. It is also not the failed BCH/LTC distance pair, whose hedge ratio left one leg at ~5% notional. Here both legs are sized to equal dollar notional, and the two assets are economically the same claim. Execution: Binance is 24/7, so a market order at the signal bar's close stands in for a next-bar-open fill (capability next_bar_open_fill = use_equivalent). On the SPOTMETAL session venue the platform fills a bar-close decision at the next bar's open (next_open_fill, supported). The developer must therefore treat the XAU leg's fill as the next open, and both legs are submitted on the same decision. Protective stops are platform-matched intrabar stops on the spread P&L, evaluated per bar. History: PAXGUSDT.BINANCE 1H bars start 2025-03-27 (~18 months). XAUUSD.SPOTMETAL 1H runs from 2003, so the binding history is the PAXG perp. Pre-study note: I tried to measure the premium's distribution and firing rate, but the catalog scan timed out. Firing frequency is therefore NOT measured. Expected firing comes from the threshold design below, and the min_dev_pct floor is tunable so the optimizer can find a region that both fires and clears costs.