Hypotheses
Switching-Cost-Regularised Fitted-Q Factor Rotation on a Point-in-Time S&P 500 Panel: Monthly Choice Among Momentum, Low-Volatility, Long-Term-Reversal (value proxy) and Short-Term-Reversal Long-Short Books (USEQ 1-DAY, dollar-neutral)
Derived by the Research Lead from Cordoni, Sancetta and Zhao, 'Dynamic Strategy Selection' (arXiv 2307.04754, Sections 2-4 and Supplement S.5): each month, pick ONE of several competing factor strategies with a…
Strategies
Hypothesis
Derived by the Research Lead from Cordoni, Sancetta and Zhao, 'Dynamic Strategy Selection' (arXiv 2307.04754, Sections 2-4 and Supplement S.5): each month, pick ONE of several competing factor strategies with a fitted-Q (iterated ridge regression) policy whose reward penalises switching by a regularising cost larger than the real trading cost. The selection algorithm, state design (12-month factor trends + market-cycle dummies), reward (quadratic utility of net return), gamma=0.9, cap B=0.5, GCV ridge grid, NA=10……Show moreShow less
Derived by the Research Lead from Cordoni, Sancetta and Zhao, 'Dynamic Strategy Selection' (arXiv 2307.04754, Sections 2-4 and Supplement S.5): each month, pick ONE of several competing factor strategies with a fitted-Q (iterated ridge regression) policy whose reward penalises switching by a regularising cost larger than the real trading cost. The selection algorithm, state design (12-month factor trends + market-cycle dummies), reward (quadratic utility of net return), gamma=0.9, cap B=0.5, GCV ridge grid, NA=10 simulated action sequences and 120-month expanding initial window are taken from the paper. What I changed and why: the paper's actions are Kenneth French MOM/HML/RMW plus a CRSP low-vol factor; we hold no fundamentals (book value, operating profitability) and no CRSP, so I build the four actions as PRICE-ONLY long-short books from our own point-in-time S&P 500 daily panel: (1) MOM = 12-1 month return winners minus losers; (2) DEF = low 252-day realized volatility minus high volatility (the paper's DEF, Novy-Marx style); (3) LTR = 36-to-12-month long-term reversal (past losers minus winners), the standard price-only proxy for HML value (De Bondt-Thaler / Fama-French LT_Rev); (4) STR = 1-month short-term reversal (last month's losers minus winners), replacing RMW which cannot be built without fundamentals. Universe AS OF EACH month-end rebalance: S&P 500 members at that date via index_member()/universe_at() (former members included where bars exist), at least 400 sessions of bars, then the 150 most liquid by trailing 60-session median dollar volume (close x volume). Each factor book: equal-weight long its top quintile (30 names) and equal-weight short its bottom quintile (30 names) of the 150-name universe. The strategy computes all four factor books' daily returns internally every month from the panel (whether held or not), so the factor-return history used for the policy is point-in-time and available from the first month the 36-month LTR lookback is filled (~2000 with membership from 1996). Only the CHOSEN book is traded. Fills: decision on the last session close of the month, market orders filled at the next session's open (platform next_open_fill, supported). Risk control route (b): signal/rebalance exit, dollar-neutral, gross 100% of equity (50% long / 50% short, 1.67% equity per name), no single position above 2% of equity, so leverage 1x gross on the Reg-T 2x account; a long-short price factor at this gross runs roughly 8-15% annual volatility, inside the conservative 60% band. Dividends are not in PnL (both sides, roughly offsetting for a dollar-neutral book; flagged). Short borrow costs are not modelled; universe is restricted to the 150 most liquid large caps to keep hard-to-borrow names out. Benchmarks the analyst must see beside the policy (pre-registered controls, computed by the strategy as report-only series): the Greedy policy (gamma=0, one iteration) and each fixed factor held throughout the same OOS span, as in the paper's Table 1.
Analysis
Dynamic Strategy Selection
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.