Strategies
Post-Listing Lottery-Premium Decay on Binance USD-M Perps — Short Each NEWLY LISTED Perp From Its Own Day+3 for 45 Days, BTC-Hedged Basket of ~37 Never-Traded Listings (2024-2026), Hard +30% Squeeze Stop, 3 Parameters
Outcome: Abandoned
PostListingLotteryPremiumDecayBasketLS
Outcome Summary
PostListingLotteryPremiumDecayBasketLS proposed an event-driven long/short book: short every newly listed Binance USD-M perp starting at its own day+3 for 45 days, capped by a +30% squeeze stop and hedged with a long BTCUSDT position sized to aggregate short notional, with only three tunable parameters. The code was written and reached the data stage, but data collection failed after five retries — one basket leg returned zero daily bars against a 50-bar / 90-day minimum — so no backtest, optimization, analyst verdict or risk review was ever produced. The run ended as abandoned for data_unavailable, which the abandon note explicitly attributes to the data layer rather than the strategy. The hypothesis remains re-evaluable once the missing listings are backfilled.
Hypothesis
An EVENT-DRIVEN, LONG-SHORT, primary-market strategy whose signal is a LISTING EVENT, not a price pattern: a brand-new Binance USD-M perp opens into attention-driven retail long demand with no borrow market, no spot inventory and no basis trade to supply the other side, and that premium decays over the following weeks. The book holds rolling SHORTS in recently-listed perps (entry at the close of each name's own 3rd bar after its first-ever bar, 45-day hold) hedged with a LONG BTCUSDT.BINANCE position sized to aggregate short notional. MEASURED ON OUR OWN CATALOG BEFORE PROPOSING: across 659 perps first listed 2023-01→2026-06 with >$20m/day early volume, day+3 / 45-day / +30%-stop BTC-hedged returned mean +6.53%, median +0.76% per trade, 51% win rate, POSITIVE IN ALL FOUR YEARS (2023 +7.3%, 2024 +13.7%, 2025 +4.8%, 2026 +3.4%), and every cell of the entry-day × hold × stop grid was positive (+2.4% to +7.6%).
data_unavailable: backtest data for BTCUSDT.BINANCE could not be collected after 5 retries: - bars (bar_type=REUSDT.BINANCE-1-DAY-LAST-EXTERNAL): got 0, needed 50, or 90+ days span The data layer (not the strategy) is the blocker — re-evaluate this hypothesis once collection is fixed / the symbol is backfilled.
Implementation
Event-driven long/short basket on Binance USD-M perps, daily bars. The signal is a LISTING EVENT: for each of 37 perps first listed between 2024-01 and 2026-06 (all still trading, all with >$200m/day early dollar volume), the strategy SHORTS the name on the bar 3 calendar days after its first-ever bar and holds 45 calendar days, exiting early if the daily close ever sits 30% above the entry price (the squeeze stop). Each short is sized at equity x leverage x short_gross_frac / max_concurrent_shorts (= 10% of equity at the defaults), and at most 6 legs are held at once, so gross short exposure is capped at 60% of equity. The aggregate short book is hedged with a LONG BTCUSDT.BINANCE position equal to the basket's mark-to-market short notional, rebalanced whenever the gap exceeds 2% of equity, so total gross stays at or below 1.2x equity against a 2x leverage request. Holding periods, entry offsets and the roll of the book are all derived from each name's listing DATE and the bar's own timestamp, never from a bar counter, so restarts change no decision.
Outcome Summary
A basket keyed to dozens of recently listed symbols is only as testable as the thinnest leg — confirm catalog coverage for every declared instrument (especially short-history new listings) before proposing a multi-leg event-driven strategy.
The run was abandoned at the data stage after 5 retries: required bars could not be collected (bar_type REUSDT.BINANCE-1-DAY-LAST-EXTERNAL returned 0 bars against a need of 50 bars / 90+ days span), so backtest-review, analyst and risk stages were never reached and no verdict was ever issued.
Short each newly listed Binance USD-M perp from its own day+3 for a 45-day hold with a hard +30% squeeze stop, as a BTC-hedged basket, betting that the listing-day 'lottery premium' from attention-driven retail long demand decays over the following weeks.
No backtest metrics exist — the backtest report is empty and optimization never ran; the only numbers on record are the hypothesis author's own pre-proposal catalog study (mean +6.53% / median +0.76% per trade, 51% win rate, positive in all four years 2023-2026), which the pipeline never independently reproduced.
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.