Strategies
LINK Daily Wide-Range-Bar Volatility-Burst Long with 200-SMA Bull Regime Filter
Outcome: Abandoned
LinkDailyWideRangeBarVolatilityBurstLong
Outcome Summary
LinkDailyWideRangeBarVolatilityBurstLong introduced a structurally novel trigger to the portfolio — Crabel's Wide Range Bar, the only total-bar-range volatility-expansion signal in the book — applied to the underutilized LINK on its reliable daily path, on the thesis that a wide bullish bar in an uptrend signals momentum initiation. The implementation was clean, but over an adequate 60-trade sample the signal carried no continuation edge: a 35% win rate, a 0.921 profit factor, negative expectancy, and a flat ~0.71% return across 6.4 years, negative in four of six. The reviewer abandoned it pre-optimization, concluding the wide bullish bar gets faded as often as it follows through and that no parameter tuning can make a non-predictive signal predictive. The lesson logged: single-bar range/volatility-expansion patterns on daily alt majors join the candle-geometry and inside-bar-cluster families as low-win-rate triggers without a continuation edge.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Long-only LINKUSDT.BINANCE daily Wide-Range-Bar (Crabel 1990) volatility-burst strategy. It enters long when the current daily bar's range (high-low) is >= 1.5x the average range of the prior 14 bars (a volatility expansion / conviction flow), the bar closes bullishly (close > open), and price is above its SMA(200) bull regime. Exits on a 5% stop, 12% take-profit, a trend break (close below SMA200), or a 10-bar time stop. Risk-based sizing (1% of equity to the stop, capped at 1x equity notional). Pure OHLCV, single instrument, three core parameters (regime SMA, range multiplier, stop).
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- -0.17
- Total return
- 0.71%
- Max drawdown
- 18.08%
- Trades
- 60
- Win rate
- 35.0%
- Profit factor
- 0.92
Clean OHLCV-only implementation, correct long-only routing, 0 dropped, metrics_reliable=true; adequate sample (60 trades) to judge the edge
Low drawdown (18%) and a mildly asymmetric payoff (avg_win > avg_loss)
No edge over an adequate sample: profit_factor 0.921, Sharpe -0.166 (CI -2.15 to +1.39), expectancy -86, win_rate 35%, CAGR -1.03%
Negative in 4 of 6 years; max_consecutive_losses 12; near-zero total return (+0.71%) over 6.4 years
Signal-quality failure: a wide-range bullish bar above the 200-SMA does not reliably initiate momentum on LINK daily (35% hit rate -> the bar gets faded)
Not a density problem (60 trades at the WF floor); a sub-1-PF base would fail deflated-Sharpe after 225-trial selection
n/a
adequate
~62 WF floor
Outcome Summary
Single-bar volatility-expansion / range-pattern triggers (wide-range bar, inside-bar cluster, candle geometry) on daily alt majors produce ~35% win-rate signals with no continuation edge — even with a 200-SMA regime filter and an asymmetric payoff, profit factor stays below 1 — because the wide bullish bar marks exhaustion/whipsaw as often as momentum initiation; the Crabel WRB thesis does not hold on LINK daily.
The analyst abandoned it at the backtest-review gate as an adequate-sample, no-edge signal-quality failure: a wide-range bullish bar above the 200-SMA does not reliably initiate momentum on LINK daily (35% hit rate — the bar gets faded), so the sub-1 profit factor is a genuine read, not a density or tuning problem, and tuning the 3 parameters cannot create predictive value from a non-predictive signal.
A long-only, OHLCV-only LINK daily volatility-expansion strategy on LINKUSDT.BINANCE using Crabel's Wide Range Bar: enter long when the current daily bar's range is >=1.5x the prior 14-bar average range, the bar closes bullishly, and price is above the 200-SMA (a momentum-initiation signal in a confirmed uptrend), exiting on a 5% stop / 12% target / trend-break / time stop — a structurally novel total-range trigger chosen for the underutilized LINK with only 3 core parameters.
Over an adequate 60-trade / 6.4-year sample it had no edge: +0.71% total return (CAGR -1.03%), Sharpe -0.166 (CI -2.15 to +1.39), profit factor 0.921, expectancy -$86/trade, 35% win rate, 18% max drawdown, 12 max consecutive losses, negative in 4 of 6 years — with a mildly asymmetric payoff (avg_win $2,885 vs avg_loss $1,686) that nets negative at the low hit rate; execution was clean (metrics_reliable=true).
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.