arXiv paper: Liquidity Provision Payoff on Automated Market Makers

Hypothesis

data_unavailable: the operator rejected the Data Scout proposal (Execute the operator-approved data decision explicitly listed in Claude handoff 2026-10-17 section 3C; no performance verdict.)

Analysis

N1 requires a new Ethereum on-chain source and pool registration; none of the listed platform collectors supplies AMM accounting data. Public RPC, Blockscout, Google BigQuery and Alchemy are candidates. No real sample or three-year completeness was verified because sample fetches failed and shell DNS was unavailable. LP fees accrue inside reserves rather than as separate distributions. Findings were written to workspace/outbox/data_scout/scout_scout-47a584ce-3ceff6-4f2b9e7b45.json.

Ethereum JSON-RPC via PublicNode

Blockscout Ethereum explorer/API

Google BigQuery Ethereum public datasets / Blockchain Analytics

Alchemy Ethereum archive Node API

N1: Ethereum JSON-RPC via PublicNode: needs an API key the platform does not hold / Google BigQuery Ethereum public datasets / Blockchain Analytics: costs money (https://cloud.google.com/blockchain-analytics/pricing: first 1 TB processed monthly free; subsequent BigQuery usage charges. No additional Blockchain Analytics charge. Total backfill cost not verified) / Google BigQuery Ethereum public datasets / Blockchain Analytics: needs a new login the platform does not hold / Alchemy Ethereum archive Node API: needs an API key the platform does not hold / Blockscout Ethereum explorer/API: cost not stated by the scout / Blockscout Ethereum explorer/API: access (public, or which login/key) not stated by the scout / Blockscout Ethereum explorer/API: coverage of the need not stated

Analysis

Liquidity Provision Payoff on Automated Market Makers