Strategies
ETH Perp Funding-Settlement Momentum Continuation (Single-Instrument USD-M, 1H, Long-Short, Flipped-Premise Follow)
Outcome: Abandoned
EthFundingSettlementMomentumContinuationLS
Outcome Summary
EthFundingSettlementMomentumContinuationLS was the analyst-suggested flip of an abandoned ETH funding-settlement reversion strategy, betting that the settlement-bar overshoot continues rather than reverts and monetizing that by trading WITH the funding-implied flow on the same proven-clean venue and data. The dense 3,860-trade backtest delivered a decisive answer in the wrong direction: it lost -56.2% (worse than the -17.9% reversion it inverted), with a Sharpe of -3.02 whose entire CI sat below zero, a profit factor of 0.74, and losses in every one of seven years, while commission consumed 18.44% of gross. The analyst abandoned it at the backtest-review gate on its second iteration, re-confirming the inverse-of-a-loser fallacy seen earlier on SOL: both fade and follow lose because the settlement move has no directional edge and the high-turnover structure is fee-fragile. It was filed alongside the session's other failed single-instrument funding-as-direction strategies, with the negative-funding-carry basket left as the genuinely promising path.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Long-short single-instrument funding-settlement momentum-continuation on ETHUSDT.BINANCE USD-M perpetual futures, 1-hour bars. Funding rate is a gating signal only (never credited as a cash flow). In the 2-hour window after each fixed funding settlement (00:00/08:00/16:00 UTC), when |funding| exceeds the threshold it follows the funding-implied continuation: funding>0 -> SELL (down-continuation of crowded-long de-risking), funding<0 -> BUY (up-continuation of short-covering). Exits on a 4-bar time stop or a 2% protective stop. This is the directional inverse of the proven-losing settlement reversion on the same clean venue/data path. Three core parameters. Iteration 2 fixes the funding parser so trades actually fire.
Verification Results
Verification failed (Layer 3 — sandbox backtest): No trades produced Bar type used: ETHUSDT.BINANCE-1-HOUR-LAST-EXTERNAL, Bars processed: 56304 Diagnostics: should_enter() returned a side 0 times over 56300 evaluated bars -> your ENTRY CONDITION never triggered. Loosen the entry logic / thresholds. Ensure your strategy produces trades with the given data and parameters.
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- -3.02
- Total return
- -56.22%
- Max drawdown
- 56.42%
- Trades
- 3860
- Win rate
- 43.8%
- Profit factor
- 0.74
Clean dense experiment: 3,860 trades over 6.5 years, single-instrument USD-M, funding-as-signal-only, no exposure bug (avg_position 10.8%), metrics_reliable — gives an unambiguous answer
Correctly implements the directional inverse of the abandoned reversion (the intended test)
The flip lost MORE than the original: total return -56.2% (vs reversion -17.9%), CAGR -11.3%, Sharpe -3.02 with entire CI below zero (-3.81 to -2.17), PF 0.74, sortino -4.28, probabilistic_sharpe 0.0
Negative in all 7 years (2020-2026), max DD 56.4%, recovery factor -1.0
Inverse-of-a-loser fallacy re-confirmed: both fade and follow lose because the settlement-bar move has no directional edge; the loss is fee drag (commission 18.44% of gross on 3,860 trades), which the flip keeps paying
Short-horizon high-turnover structure is structurally fee-fragile on a single major
>0 to be viable
negative 7/7 years
majority positive
Outcome Summary
The inverse-of-a-loser fallacy strikes again: a fee-bleeding fade does not have a mirror-image winning inverse, because the loss came from fee drag and no edge, not from direction — short-horizon, high-turnover funding-settlement-clock strategies on a single crypto major have no directional edge and are dominated by ~18% commission, joining the broad single-instrument funding-as-direction family that has shown no exploitable edge all session.
On its second and final iteration the analyst issued an 'abandon' verdict at the pre-optimization backtest-review gate, so optimization, analysis, and risk review never ran: because BOTH fading and following the settlement move lose, the settlement-bar overshoot carries no exploitable directional edge in either direction — the reversion lost to fee drag and absence of edge, not to being on the wrong side, and flipping direction keeps paying the same ~18%-of-gross costs.
A long-short, single-instrument, short-horizon momentum-continuation strategy on ETHUSDT.BINANCE USD-M 1H perpetual futures that FOLLOWED (rather than faded) the directional price move around the fixed funding-settlement clock (00:00/08:00/16:00 UTC), using funding only as a gating signal — selling when funding was positive and buying when negative — as the analyst-recommended flipped premise of an earlier abandoned settlement-reversion strategy, on the thesis that the settlement-bar overshoot continues rather than reverts.
On a dense, clean 3,860-trade sample over 6.5 years the flip lost even harder than the original reversion: total return -56.2% (vs -17.9%), CAGR -11.3%, Sharpe -3.02 with the entire CI deeply below zero (-3.81 to -2.17), probabilistic Sharpe 0.0, profit factor 0.74, Sortino -4.28, 56.4% max drawdown, negative in all 7 years, with commission at 18.44% of gross.
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.