Strategies
LTC Net-Directional Time-Series Momentum (Single-Instrument USD-M, Long-Short, 4H, Discrete Trend-Flip Entries, Capital-Capped, Pure OHLCV)
Outcome: Abandoned
LtcFourHourTimeSeriesMomentumNetDirectionalLS
Outcome Summary
LtcFourHourTimeSeriesMomentumNetDirectionalLS was the third run of the sanctioned single-asset TSM template, deliberately placed on LTC — the lowest-beta, cleanest-trending, least-mania-concentrated uncovered major — to maximize generalization odds and dodge the session's 2021-concentration holdout killer. The asset choice changed the symptom but not the disease: the signal lost money (profit factor 0.917, CAGR -28.9%, four losing years, -60% total, 86% drawdown), and the discrete entry re-fired while a position was open, stacking exposure to 104% vs the intended 50% and printing physically-impossible +94% single days. The analyst abandoned it at the backtest-review gate on its first iteration, noting this template has now failed on every asset tried — BNB and XRP liquidated, LTC merely bled because of its lower beta. The recorded conclusion was that the template is a broken implementation of a dead signal, asset selection cannot manufacture an edge, and the capital-cap claim was once again falsified by realized exposure.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Long-short single-instrument net-directional time-series momentum on LTCUSDT.BINANCE USD-M perpetual futures, 4-hour bars, pure OHLCV. Direction is the sign of the trailing 60-bar (~10-day) return with a 2% hysteresis band: it goes long when momentum is above +2%, short when below -2%, and holds the discrete full-size position until momentum flips to the opposite band (exit-and-reverse) or a wide 4x-ATR chandelier trailing stop (ratcheting from the peak/trough since entry) is hit. Single position sized at 50% of stable realized equity, hard-capped <=100% at leverage 1.0. Three tunables: trend_lookback, entry_band, stop_atr_mult.
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- -0.12
- Total return
- -60.33%
- Max drawdown
- 85.83%
- Trades
- 739
- Win rate
- 35.5%
- Profit factor
- 0.92
Pure OHLCV, fires densely (739 trades), full clean LTC history — no data-abort; did not liquidate
Diversification intent (low-beta PoW-payment major) is reasonable in principle
Losing signal: profit_factor 0.917 (<1.0), CAGR -28.9%, Sharpe -0.12, expectancy -$120/trade; losing badly in 4 of 7 years (2021 -33.5%, 2022 -47.8%, 2023 -29.9%, 2025 -55.6%, 2026 -64.9%)
Over-exposure/stacking bug: avg_position_pct 103.6% vs the intended position_pct 0.50 (~2x the cap) — same defect as the BNB/XRP siblings, milder
Physically-impossible prints: +94.55% (2026-06-12), +71.25% (2026-05-30) on a 0.50-notional LTC position; return_kurtosis 149, annualized_volatility 68%
total_return -60.3%, max_drawdown 85.8% — bled (not liquidated) only because LTC is lower-beta
~50 (position_pct 0.50)
<~15 (single LTC, pos 0.50)
Outcome Summary
The single-asset discrete-entry net-directional TSM template fails on EVERY asset tried (BNB liquidated, XRP liquidated, LTC -60%) — the signal is PF<1.0 (regime-dead naked trend) AND the discrete entry over-exposes to 2-6x the stated cap with impossible prints; asset selection (low-beta vs mania-alt) only changes whether it liquidates or bleeds, it does not create an edge, and a 'capital-capped ≤100%' docstring claim is again falsified by realized avg_position_pct.
The analyst issued an 'abandon' verdict at the pre-optimization backtest-review gate, so optimization, analysis, and risk review never ran: naked single-asset TSM has negative gross expectancy on LTC just as on BNB/XRP (the regime-dead naked-trend family), the discrete entry re-fires while a position is open and stacks size beyond the stated cap, and a return series with impossible bars cannot be optimized — fixing the bug would only surface a PF-0.917 money-loser.
A long-short, single-instrument net-directional time-series momentum strategy on LTCUSDT.BINANCE USD-M 4H perpetual that set its side by the sign of the trailing 60-bar return (long above a +entry_band, short below a -entry_band), holding discrete full-size positions until a momentum flip or a wide ATR chandelier trailing stop, claiming a capital cap of ≤100% — the third instance of the sanctioned single-asset TSM template, deliberately on LTC as the lowest-beta, least-mania-concentrated uncovered major for the best holdout odds.
It failed the same two ways as the BNB and XRP siblings: a losing signal (profit factor 0.917 <1.0, CAGR -28.9%, Sharpe -0.12, expectancy -$120/trade, losing in 4 of 7 years, -60.3% total, 85.8% max drawdown) plus the over-exposure/stacking bug (avg_position_pct 103.6% vs the intended 0.50, ~2x the cap) with physically-impossible prints (+94.55% on 2026-06-12, kurtosis 149) — it bled rather than liquidating only because LTC is lower-beta.
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.