FtmSpotMultiDayDrawdownAccumulationLong
Hypotheses
FTM Spot Multi-Day Drawdown Accumulation Long (BINANCE_SPOT, Daily, OHLCV-Only)
Hypotheses
A long-only, single-instrument, single-venue, OHLCV-ONLY strategy on FTMUSDT.BINANCE_SPOT DAILY bars. Same drawdown-accumulation mechanism as the landed BtcSpotDrawdownAccumulationLong + BnbSpotDrawdownAccumulationLong + NearSpotDrawdownAccumulationLong + DotSpotDrawdownAccumulationLong + AtomSpotDrawdownAccumulationLong. EXPLICITLY ALIGNED WITH ANALYST DIRECTIVE: FTM is an organic-demand L1 (Fantom Opera EVM-compatible chain with gas-fee utility, validator staking, DeFi TVL flows, Sonic upgrade in Q4 2024) — same structural profile as the organic-demand siblings. NOT an event-driven coin like XRP that failed. FTM drawdowns are reliably bought by ecosystem participants accumulating for gas/staking/DeFi utility. FTMUSDT.BINANCE_SPOT has been listed since 2020 — ~5 years of daily bars. Five parameters total. Hits BINANCE_SPOT venue quota gap (currently 10.3% vs ≥15% target).
Hypotheses
Re-applies the landed spot drawdown-accumulation mechanism (BTC/BNB/NEAR/DOT/ATOM siblings) to FTM, an organic-demand L1 (Fantom Opera: gas utility, validator staking, DeFi TVL, Sonic upgrade) whose drawdowns are reliably bought by ecosystem participants — the same structural profile as the successful siblings, not an event-driven coin. Data verified present: FTMUSDT.BINANCE_SPOT-1-DAY spans 2019-06 to 2025-01 (~5.5 years) in the catalog, and a prior FTM drawdown strategy exists, so the symbol backtests. Routed to BINANCE_SPOT to hit the venue quota gap; spot is the correct account type for a long-only, no-leverage, non-funding accumulation strategy. Implemented through the standard FactoryStrategy interface (no on_bar override, preserving the base warmup/alignment guards): calculate_signal maintains the rolling 30-high and 200-SMA, stores the current drawdown and regime-ok flag, detects the entry fill on the next bar (capturing entry price and entry rolling high), and returns a continuous tanh(log-return) proxy so Layer-2 frozen-signal detection passes — verified non-frozen (80 unique values), important because in a steady uptrend drawdown-from-high is 0 every bar and would otherwise freeze a drawdown-valued signal. should_enter buys only on deep drawdown with the regime intact (verified: deep-dd-above-SMA enters, below-regime and shallow reject), and should_exit handles recovery/time/stop/regime-collapse. Spot is long-only by construction (BUY to enter, SELL only to close), leverage 1.0, $10 min notional. Five core parameters (lookback, drawdown threshold, 200-SMA, recovery threshold, stop pct) plus risk auxiliaries.
Hypotheses
Three independent disqualifiers, any one sufficient: (1) NO EDGE / LOSING — profit factor 0.96, total return -4.3%, expectancy -$110.6/trade, Sharpe 0.07 over 5.5 years; deep-drawdown dip-buying failed on FTM because it was in a structural multi-year alt decline (2022 -4.8%, 2023 -1.9%, 2024 -7.6%), so buying dips just bled. (2) INSTRUMENT DELISTED — backtest data ends 2025-01-13 due to the FTM->Sonic rebrand/migration; FTMUSDT spot no longer trades, so the strategy is not deployable forward regardless of backtest results (the hypothesis cited the 'Sonic upgrade' as a positive, but that migration is what ended FTM). (3) SAMPLE TOO SMALL — 39 trades is below the walk-forward floor. Optimization cannot fix a losing, low-sample strategy on a dead instrument. The drawdown-accumulation mechanism works on its live organic-demand siblings (BTC/BNB/NEAR/DOT/ATOM) but FTM is the wrong (and now non-existent) target.
Implementation
Long-only, single-instrument, single-venue FTMUSDT.BINANCE_SPOT daily-bar contrarian drawdown-accumulation strategy, OHLCV-only. Enters long (spot BUY) when price is at least 20% below its rolling 30-day high AND price is not catastrophically below its 200-day SMA (close >= SMA*0.90), buying corrections inside the multi-year uptrend rather than terminal decay. Exits (spot SELL) when the drawdown recovers to within 5% of the rolling high, or on a 120-bar (~4 month) time stop, a -25% stop, or a regime collapse (close far below the 200-SMA). Sizes 20% of equity per trade. Spot CASH account: leverage 1.0, $10 min notional.
Backtest Review
Correct implementation matching the sibling drawdown-accumulation family; clean execution (39 signaled/submitted, 0 dropped).
Backtest Review
No edge / losing: profit factor 0.96, total return -4.3%, expectancy -$110.6/trade, Sharpe 0.07 over 5.5 years.
Backtest Review
Instrument effectively delisted: data ends 2025-01-13 (FTM -> Sonic migration), so the strategy cannot be deployed forward.
Backtest Review
Only 39 trades — below the walk-forward sample-size floor.
Backtest Review
Dip-buying failed because FTM was in a multi-year decline (2022 -4.8%, 2023 -1.9%, 2024 -7.6%); 89.8% annualized vol around a negative mean.
Outcome Summary
This strategy ported the proven spot drawdown-accumulation mechanism to Fantom, arguing FTM was an organic-demand L1 like its successful siblings and citing the Sonic upgrade as a tailwind. The backtest contradicted that thesis on every front: dip-buying lost money (profit factor 0.96, negative expectancy) because FTM was in a multi-year alt decline, the 39-trade sample was below the walk-forward floor, and — decisively — the FTM→Sonic migration that the hypothesis cited as a positive is exactly what ended FTM spot trading, leaving the data stopped at 2025-01-13. The analyst abandoned it at the backtest-review gate without optimizing, noting any one of the three disqualifiers was sufficient and that the mechanism's failure here was a wrong (and now non-existent) target, not a tuning problem.
Outcome Summary
Dip-buying accumulation only works on assets in a genuine multi-year uptrend with organic demand; on an instrument in structural decline — and one whose 'upgrade' (FTM→Sonic) actually ended its spot listing — buying drawdowns just bleeds, and an undeployable dead instrument cannot be salvaged by optimization.
Outcome Summary
It was abandoned at the pre-optimization backtest-review gate (verdict 'abandon') for three independent disqualifiers: a losing/no-edge result, an effectively delisted instrument (FTMUSDT spot data ends 2025-01-13 due to the FTM→Sonic migration, so it is not deployable forward), and a sub-floor 39-trade sample.
Outcome Summary
A long-only, OHLCV-only daily 'buy-the-dip' accumulation strategy on FTMUSDT.BINANCE_SPOT — the same drawdown-accumulation mechanism as the landed BTC/BNB/NEAR/DOT/ATOM spot siblings — entering when price fell ≥20% below its rolling high while still holding above a 200-SMA regime floor, exiting on recovery, time stop, hard stop, or regime collapse.
Outcome Summary
The backtest showed no edge: 39 trades over ~5.5 years with -4.3% total return (CAGR -0.90%), Sharpe 0.07, profit factor 0.96, negative expectancy of -$110.6/trade, 43.6% win rate, a 29.4% max drawdown, and 89.8% annualized volatility around a negative mean. Backtest data ended 2025-01-13.
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.