Skip to content
All strategies

Strategies

Hyperliquid BTC Intraday 15-Minute Momentum Trend-Continuation, LONG/SHORT (Single-Instrument HYPERLIQUID Perp, Pure OHLCV, Flip-Via-Flat, Fee-Gated Selective Entries Holding Hours, Fixed-Fractional Sizing — Intraday LS on the One Fully-Proven-Clean Combo HL BTC [LS sizes 97%], Defeats the HL Daily Data-Sparsity Wall, Fills ALL THREE Top Gaps: Long-Short + HL Venue + Short Horizon, Pre-Registered Sizing Probe, Tail-Safe, Low-Parameter)

Outcome: Abandoned

BtcHyperliquidIntraday15mMomentumContinuationLS

Outcome Summary

BtcHyperliquidIntraday15mMomentumContinuationLS aimed to be the highest-value evaluable idea of its batch, filling the long-short, Hyperliquid, and short-horizon gaps simultaneously while betting that 15-minute cadence over ~3 years would defeat the daily data-sparsity wall that had killed its daily siblings. Instead the run exposed only ~57 days of HL 15m data (4,914 bars), so the promised walk-forward and holdout were impossible, and the momentum signal was a heavy loser — Sharpe -10, profit factor 0.42, 80% losing trades — whose fees alone consumed 51.7% of gross despite a design built to hold hours and beat costs. The reviewer abandoned it at the pre-optimization gate, reasoning that no parameter sweep can manufacture multi-year data or turn a fees-eat-half signal into an edge. The sizing probe passed (avg_position_pct ~101%, clean), preserving the finding that HL BTC long-short sizes correctly, but the conclusion was that both daily and intraday HL trend books are defeated by Hyperliquid's short history, with no clean, deep-data venue currently available.

Hypothesis

A LONG-SHORT, SINGLE-INSTRUMENT, INTRADAY 15-MINUTE momentum / trend-continuation strategy on BTCUSD.HYPERLIQUID that goes LONG on confirmed intraday up-momentum and SHORT on confirmed intraday down-momentum, flipping ONLY via flat. This is the highest-value remaining EVALUABLE idea because it uniquely fills the THREE most under-represented reachable buckets simultaneously: (1) DIRECTION — long_only is 85.8% vs the <=55% target (the single largest quota miss); only a long-SHORT book can fix it, and long/flat……Show moreShow less

A LONG-SHORT, SINGLE-INSTRUMENT, INTRADAY 15-MINUTE momentum / trend-continuation strategy on BTCUSD.HYPERLIQUID that goes LONG on confirmed intraday up-momentum and SHORT on confirmed intraday down-momentum, flipping ONLY via flat. This is the highest-value remaining EVALUABLE idea because it uniquely fills the THREE most under-represented reachable buckets simultaneously: (1) DIRECTION — long_only is 85.8% vs the <=55% target (the single largest quota miss); only a long-SHORT book can fix it, and long/flat books (the two pending intraday HL books) cannot. (2) VENUE — HYPERLIQUID 6.8% vs >=20%. (3) HORIZON — short 1m-15m 3.7% vs >=10%. Crucially it sits on the ONE combination now PROVEN clean on every axis: HL BTC long-short sizes correctly at avg_position_pct 97% (the HL BTC TS-mom LS sibling, sent to optimize), so the LS / flip path is NOT the over-exposure bug — that was BINANCE USD-M/COIN-M (engine over-exposure) and HL SOL (early-data artifact, now dropped), while HL BTC/ETH are clean. It is DISTINCT from both the daily HL BTC TS-mom LS (which risks the HL daily data-sparsity wall: ~3yr history -> ~0-1 OOS trades for daily cadence) and the long/flat HL BTC intraday breakout (no short side): intraday cadence over ~3yr (~75k 15m bars) yields HUNDREDS of trades, making a valid 3-window walk-forward + 15-day holdout possible (defeating the wall that killed the HL daily books), and the LS construction adds intraday DOWN-trend capture. Constraint context: BINANCE USD-M + COIN-M perp over-exposure-broken (stop probing them); spot-CASH MTM, multi-instrument aggregation, options settlement broken; census signals data-walled -> OHLCV only; HL is the only clean venue and HL BTC the safest instrument. FEE DISCIPLINE is central (HL ~0.09% RT, need >0.15% net/trade): entries are SELECTIVE momentum continuations gated by range/volume expansion, holding HOURS (not minutes), targeting >0.3-0.4% gross legs — explicitly NOT scalping. FLIP-VIA-FLAT: on a momentum sign reversal, exit fully to flat one bar, then open the opposite side, so the engine never nets opposing fills (cleanest LS construction). Bug-avoiding otherwise: pure OHLCV, ONE fixed-fractional size per entry, NO dynamic resizing, leverage 1.0, dual flat guard. PRE-REGISTERED ACCEPTANCE / SIZING PROBE (retained; HL not assumed uniformly clean and this is the intraday-LS path): avg_position_pct ~<=100% and no physically impossible intraday equity jump (BTC at 1x ~+/-15-20%); if violated, abandon & escalate as the HL-BTC-intraday-LS reproducer. Low parameter count (momentum lookback, expansion filter, ATR stop, trend filter).

Implements the hypothesis as an intraday two-sided momentum book on the single combination proven clean on every axis (HL BTC long-short sizes ~97%), filling the three largest reachable quota gaps simultaneously: long_short direction, the HYPERLIQUID venue, and the short intraday horizon. The 15-minute cadence over ~3yr yields hundreds of trades, defeating the daily HL data-sparsity wall that produces too few OOS trades for a valid walk-forward + holdout. Defect-avoidance: (1) single-instrument, pure OHLCV (no……Show moreShow less

Implements the hypothesis as an intraday two-sided momentum book on the single combination proven clean on every axis (HL BTC long-short sizes ~97%), filling the three largest reachable quota gaps simultaneously: long_short direction, the HYPERLIQUID venue, and the short intraday horizon. The 15-minute cadence over ~3yr yields hundreds of trades, defeating the daily HL data-sparsity wall that produces too few OOS trades for a valid walk-forward + holdout. Defect-avoidance: (1) single-instrument, pure OHLCV (no funding subscription, no extra legs) so multi-instrument aggregation and funding defects cannot apply; (2) flip-via-flat is structural — should_exit closes to flat on a reversal and the base engine evaluates an entry only when position is None, so opposing fills are never netted; (3) ONE fixed-fractional size (notional = 0.95*equity, qty = notional/price), no dynamic resizing, leverage left at 1.0 so engine margin model and in-strategy notional agree. Fee discipline is central: the expansion gate makes entries selective momentum continuations targeting >0.3-0.4% gross legs, comfortably above HL's ~0.09% round-trip, explicitly avoiding scalping; the vol-normalized score keeps the signal continuous, conviction-bearing, and threshold-stable across volatility regimes. Pre-registered sizing probe: avg_position_pct should be <=~100% and no physically impossible intraday equity jump (BTC at 1x ~+/-15-20%); a violation would indicate the over-exposure defect reaches the HL BTC intraday LS path and should be abandoned/escalated as the reproducer.

Two independent decisive failures, before any optimization. (1) PREMISE FALSIFIED — DATA WALL NOT DEFEATED: the hypothesis bet that intraday 15m cadence over ~3yr (~75k bars) would yield hundreds of trades for a valid 3-window walk-forward + 15-day holdout, defeating the HL daily data-sparsity wall. But the run has only ~57 days of HL BTC 15m data (2026-03-16 to 2026-05-13, 4914 bars), not 3 years. A walk-forward/holdout over 57 days is meaningless, so the entire rationale collapses — the intraday cadence hit the……Show moreShow less

Two independent decisive failures, before any optimization. (1) PREMISE FALSIFIED — DATA WALL NOT DEFEATED: the hypothesis bet that intraday 15m cadence over ~3yr (~75k bars) would yield hundreds of trades for a valid 3-window walk-forward + 15-day holdout, defeating the HL daily data-sparsity wall. But the run has only ~57 days of HL BTC 15m data (2026-03-16 to 2026-05-13, 4914 bars), not 3 years. A walk-forward/holdout over 57 days is meaningless, so the entire rationale collapses — the intraday cadence hit the SAME sparsity wall at finer resolution (symptom observed in-run; recommend verifying HL 15m catalog depth before retrying this family). (2) STRONGLY NEGATIVE EDGE: total_return -14.0%, Sharpe -10.0 (CI -14.7 to -6.4, entirely below 0), Sortino -11.9, profit_factor 0.42, win_rate 20.4%, avg_trade_return -$217 — and the fee-discipline claim failed outright (commission_pct_of_gross 51.68%, +$9,544 impact), so fees consumed half the gross despite holding hours. The only thing that worked is the sizing probe (avg_position_pct 101%, clean, metrics_reliable=true), which does not rescue the run. Not optimize: optimization cannot manufacture multi-year 15m data (so the promised validation is impossible regardless of parameters) and cannot convert a PF-0.42, fees-eat-52%-of-gross signal into an edge. The intraday-LS-momentum family has no clean+deep-data home right now — HL has only ~2 months of 15m history and the deep-history venues (BINANCE USD-M/COIN-M) are blocked by the engine over-exposure defect. FAILURE PATTERN: moving the HL trend edge to intraday 15m to escape the daily ~3yr sparsity wall does NOT work — the HL 15m catalog itself is only ~57 days, so the promised valid walk-forward/holdout is impossible, and the momentum-continuation signal on BTC 15m is a heavy net loser (Sharpe -10, PF 0.42) whose fees consume half the gross. Both the daily and intraday HL trend books are defeated by HL's short data history; the validated trend edge needs a deep-history venue that the engine can size correctly, which currently does not exist.

Implementation

Long/short intraday 15-minute momentum trend-continuation strategy on BTCUSD.HYPERLIQUID, pure OHLCV. The signal is a vol-normalized momentum score (a Sharpe-like t-stat of the trend over a 16-bar/~4h lookback). It goes long when score > +0.6 and close > a 96-bar/~24h SMA, short when score < -0.6 and close < that SMA, but ONLY when a range/volume expansion gate confirms momentum ignition (recent 4-bar mean range >= 1.3x the 48-bar baseline and volume >= 1.2x baseline) — a fee-discipline filter that targets sustained moves held for hours rather than scalps. Exits on momentum reversal (score crossing the exit band or close crossing the SMA against the position), a 3x-ATR hard stop frozen at entry, or an 8% percentage stop. Flips route through flat (exit fully, re-enter opposite side on a later flat bar) so the engine never nets opposing fills. One fixed-fractional position (95% equity notional) per entry, no dynamic resizing, leverage 1.0.

Backtest Review

Sharpe
-10.04
Total return
-23.53%
Max drawdown
25.12%
Trades
108
Win rate
20.4%
Profit factor
0.42

Sizing probe roughly passed: avg_position_pct 101% (~at the ceiling, no over-exposure corruption), no physically impossible intraday equity jumps, metrics_reliable=true — confirms HL BTC LS sizing is clean, consistent with the sibling.

Implementation is sound: flip-via-flat, expansion-gated selective entries, holds hours (avg 4h 46m) as designed, leverage 1.0.

CORE PREMISE FALSIFIED: only ~57 days of HL BTC 15m data exist in the run (2026-03-16 to 2026-05-13, 4914 bars), NOT the assumed ~3yr/75k bars. The promised valid 3-window walk-forward + 15-day holdout is impossible — the intraday cadence did NOT defeat the data-sparsity wall.

Strongly negative edge: total_return -14.0%, Sharpe -10.0 (CI entirely below 0), Sortino -11.9, profit_factor 0.42, win_rate 20.4%, avg_trade_return -$217.

Fee discipline failed: commission_pct_of_gross 51.68% (fees ate half the gross) plus $9,544 impact, despite the fee-gated 'hold hours not minutes' design.

108 trades over ~2 months were ~80% losers (max_consecutive_losses 10) — momentum continuation on BTC 15m got whipsawed in the March-May 2026 regime.

Outcome Summary

Moving a Hyperliquid trend edge to a finer intraday timeframe does not escape the venue's short-history wall — the 15m catalog itself was only ~57 days — and a fee-gated momentum design must verify data depth and actually clear costs, since fees here ate 52% of gross on a losing signal.

The analyst (backtest-review gate) abandoned it before optimization for two independent reasons: the core premise was falsified — only ~57 days / 4,914 bars of HL 15m data existed rather than the assumed ~3yr/75k bars, making the promised walk-forward and holdout impossible — and the signal showed a strongly negative edge with failed fee discipline.

A long/short, single-instrument, OHLCV-only intraday 15-minute momentum trend-continuation book on BTCUSD.HYPERLIQUID (flip-via-flat, expansion-gated selective entries, leverage 1.0) intended to fill three quota gaps at once — long-short direction, the HL venue, and the short intraday horizon — while using intraday cadence to escape the Hyperliquid daily data-sparsity wall.

It was a heavy net loser over ~57 days and 108 trades: -14.0% total return, Sharpe -10.0 (CI -14.7 to -6.4), Sortino -11.9, profit factor 0.42, 20.4% win rate, avg_trade_return -$217, with commission_pct_of_gross at 51.68% (fees consumed half the gross); the only success was the sizing probe (avg_position_pct ~101%, metrics_reliable=true).

Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.