Strategies
Hyperliquid BTC Intraday 15-Minute Momentum Trend-Continuation, LONG/SHORT (Single-Instrument HYPERLIQUID Perp, Pure OHLCV, Flip-Via-Flat, Fee-Gated Selective Entries Holding Hours, Fixed-Fractional Sizing — Intraday LS on the One Fully-Proven-Clean Combo HL BTC [LS sizes 97%], Defeats the HL Daily Data-Sparsity Wall, Fills ALL THREE Top Gaps: Long-Short + HL Venue + Short Horizon, Pre-Registered Sizing Probe, Tail-Safe, Low-Parameter)
Outcome: Abandoned
BtcHyperliquidIntraday15mMomentumContinuationLS
Outcome Summary
BtcHyperliquidIntraday15mMomentumContinuationLS aimed to be the highest-value evaluable idea of its batch, filling the long-short, Hyperliquid, and short-horizon gaps simultaneously while betting that 15-minute cadence over ~3 years would defeat the daily data-sparsity wall that had killed its daily siblings. Instead the run exposed only ~57 days of HL 15m data (4,914 bars), so the promised walk-forward and holdout were impossible, and the momentum signal was a heavy loser — Sharpe -10, profit factor 0.42, 80% losing trades — whose fees alone consumed 51.7% of gross despite a design built to hold hours and beat costs. The reviewer abandoned it at the pre-optimization gate, reasoning that no parameter sweep can manufacture multi-year data or turn a fees-eat-half signal into an edge. The sizing probe passed (avg_position_pct ~101%, clean), preserving the finding that HL BTC long-short sizes correctly, but the conclusion was that both daily and intraday HL trend books are defeated by Hyperliquid's short history, with no clean, deep-data venue currently available.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Long/short intraday 15-minute momentum trend-continuation strategy on BTCUSD.HYPERLIQUID, pure OHLCV. The signal is a vol-normalized momentum score (a Sharpe-like t-stat of the trend over a 16-bar/~4h lookback). It goes long when score > +0.6 and close > a 96-bar/~24h SMA, short when score < -0.6 and close < that SMA, but ONLY when a range/volume expansion gate confirms momentum ignition (recent 4-bar mean range >= 1.3x the 48-bar baseline and volume >= 1.2x baseline) — a fee-discipline filter that targets sustained moves held for hours rather than scalps. Exits on momentum reversal (score crossing the exit band or close crossing the SMA against the position), a 3x-ATR hard stop frozen at entry, or an 8% percentage stop. Flips route through flat (exit fully, re-enter opposite side on a later flat bar) so the engine never nets opposing fills. One fixed-fractional position (95% equity notional) per entry, no dynamic resizing, leverage 1.0.
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- -10.04
- Total return
- -23.53%
- Max drawdown
- 25.12%
- Trades
- 108
- Win rate
- 20.4%
- Profit factor
- 0.42
Sizing probe roughly passed: avg_position_pct 101% (~at the ceiling, no over-exposure corruption), no physically impossible intraday equity jumps, metrics_reliable=true — confirms HL BTC LS sizing is clean, consistent with the sibling.
Implementation is sound: flip-via-flat, expansion-gated selective entries, holds hours (avg 4h 46m) as designed, leverage 1.0.
CORE PREMISE FALSIFIED: only ~57 days of HL BTC 15m data exist in the run (2026-03-16 to 2026-05-13, 4914 bars), NOT the assumed ~3yr/75k bars. The promised valid 3-window walk-forward + 15-day holdout is impossible — the intraday cadence did NOT defeat the data-sparsity wall.
Strongly negative edge: total_return -14.0%, Sharpe -10.0 (CI entirely below 0), Sortino -11.9, profit_factor 0.42, win_rate 20.4%, avg_trade_return -$217.
Fee discipline failed: commission_pct_of_gross 51.68% (fees ate half the gross) plus $9,544 impact, despite the fee-gated 'hold hours not minutes' design.
108 trades over ~2 months were ~80% losers (max_consecutive_losses 10) — momentum continuation on BTC 15m got whipsawed in the March-May 2026 regime.
Outcome Summary
Moving a Hyperliquid trend edge to a finer intraday timeframe does not escape the venue's short-history wall — the 15m catalog itself was only ~57 days — and a fee-gated momentum design must verify data depth and actually clear costs, since fees here ate 52% of gross on a losing signal.
The analyst (backtest-review gate) abandoned it before optimization for two independent reasons: the core premise was falsified — only ~57 days / 4,914 bars of HL 15m data existed rather than the assumed ~3yr/75k bars, making the promised walk-forward and holdout impossible — and the signal showed a strongly negative edge with failed fee discipline.
A long/short, single-instrument, OHLCV-only intraday 15-minute momentum trend-continuation book on BTCUSD.HYPERLIQUID (flip-via-flat, expansion-gated selective entries, leverage 1.0) intended to fill three quota gaps at once — long-short direction, the HL venue, and the short intraday horizon — while using intraday cadence to escape the Hyperliquid daily data-sparsity wall.
It was a heavy net loser over ~57 days and 108 trades: -14.0% total return, Sharpe -10.0 (CI -14.7 to -6.4), Sortino -11.9, profit factor 0.42, 20.4% win rate, avg_trade_return -$217, with commission_pct_of_gross at 51.68% (fees consumed half the gross); the only success was the sizing probe (avg_position_pct ~101%, metrics_reliable=true).
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.