Strategies
ETH 15-Minute Large-Impulse-Bar Continuation (Single-Instrument USD-M, Long-Short, Fast Intraday, Ride Directional Impulse Bars, Tight Initial Stop, Trailing-Stop Winners, Discrete Capital-Capped, Pure OHLCV)
Outcome: Abandoned
EthImpulseBarContinuationTrendLS15m
Outcome Summary
EthImpulseBarContinuationTrendLS15m bet that the factory's only promoted impulse strategy (ETH 1H, Sharpe 1.40) would transfer to the under-served 15-minute grain, entering on large directional thrusts and trailing the winners. Instead, the faster grain inverted the economics: 4244 trades at 229x turnover burned 20.35% of gross in commissions, the average net trade came out negative (-$37.33), and the signal lost money every year before the account was liquidated to -100% on 2022-08-04. A sizing bug that ran positions at ~103% of equity (double the intended 50% cap) added physically-impossible death-spiral prints on the way down. The analyst abandoned it at the pre-optimization backtest-review gate, concluding 'proven asset x proven grain' was falsified — 15m is fee-death territory for impulse continuation, not a proven grain — so it never reached optimization.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Long-short single-instrument ETHUSDT.BINANCE 15-minute large-impulse-bar continuation strategy, pure OHLCV. It enters in the direction of a high-conviction impulse bar -- a 15m bar whose directional body exceeds 1.5x ATR(14) and which closes in the strong third of its range (long on a bullish thrust, short on a bearish one) -- to capture short-horizon continuation. It exits to flat on a combined stop: a tight 1.0x-ATR initial stop that converts into a 3.0x-ATR trailing stop from the running extreme, plus a 24h safety cap. Discrete enter-then-exit-to-flat (no netting flip), sized 1% equity risk to the initial stop, capped at 50% notional, leverage 1.0. Three tunables: impulse_mult, trail_mult, init_stop_mult.
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- -0.30
- Total return
- -100.00%
- Max drawdown
- 100.00%
- Trades
- 4244
- Win rate
- 27.3%
- Profit factor
- 0.76
Mechanism is validated at 1H (ETH 1H impulse promoted, Sharpe 1.40); pure OHLCV, fires densely (4244 trades) — no data-abort
Reasonable intent (under-served fast-grain bucket)
FEE DEATH at 15m: commission_pct_of_gross 20.35%, turnover 229x, $100k commission; avg_trade_return -$37 (NEGATIVE) — fails the hypothesis's own 'avg net trade > 0.15%' gate; 'fee-aware by construction' is falsified
Losing signal: profit_factor 0.757 (<1.0), Sharpe -0.30, win_rate 27%, losing every year (2020 -41%, 2021 -80%, 2022 -226%)
LIQUIDATED 2022-08-04: total_return -100%, max_drawdown 100%, dead 2023-2026 (all 0.0)
Over-exposed ~2x: avg_position_pct 103% vs the intended max_notional_frac 0.50; impossible death-spiral prints (-651.9% on 2022-07-29, +324.4% on 2022-07-18), return_kurtosis 755, vol 145%
<=50 (max_notional_frac 0.50)
>0 (hyp: >0.15%)
Outcome Summary
The impulse-bar-continuation edge is grain-specific: an asset/mechanism proven at 1H does not transfer to 15m, where higher firing rates invert the fee arithmetic (commissions ~20% of gross) and turn a PF>1 edge into a sub-fee money-loser, so a high impulse_mult alone does not make a sub-1H strategy fee-viable.
The analyst abandoned it at the backtest-review gate (verdict: abandon) because fees were the assassin — the average net trade was negative, directly failing the hypothesis's own 'avg net trade > 0.15%' viability bar — and a discrete-entry sizing blowup (avg_position_pct 103% vs the intended 50% cap, with impossible death-spiral prints) amplified the bleed into liquidation; optimization was never run.
A long-short, single-instrument pure-OHLCV strategy on ETHUSDT 15-minute USD-M futures that entered in the direction of large impulse bars (body > impulse_mult x ATR closing in the strong third of range) to ride short-horizon continuation with a tight initial stop and a trailing stop, porting the promoted ETH 1H impulse template to the faster 15m grain.
Over 2208 days it fired 4244 trades at 229x turnover with a 27.3% win rate, profit_factor 0.757, Sharpe -0.30, and a negative avg_trade_return of -$37.33; commissions reached 20.35% of gross ($100k) and the account was liquidated on 2022-08-04 for a total_return of -100% (max_drawdown 100%).
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.