Strategies
BTC Spot Dual-Timeframe Momentum Confluence, LONG-ONLY 1x (BTCUSDT.BINANCE_SPOT, 4H Primary + 1D Confirm, Long Only When BOTH Timeframes Point UP, FLAT to Cash Otherwise, ATR-Trailing + Daily-Regime-Break Exit, Source-Optimised Parameters Retained)
Outcome: Paper Trading
BtcSpotDualTimeframeMomentumConfluenceLong
Outcome Summary
BtcSpotDualTimeframeMomentumConfluenceLong carried the factory's best-performing futures momentum strategy over to BTC spot as a long-only, unleveraged strategy, kept the parameters from the source optimisation, and went to cash whenever the 4-hour and daily momentum disagreed or both pointed down. Over 8.5 years it returned +69.9% on 309 trades with Sharpe 0.86, a 12.4% max drawdown and a 1.04% average net trade, with low beta (0.08) to BTC. The analyst promoted it on a profitable holdout, robust parameters and limits that held, while noting that significance was not established, the signal had no forecasting power, and two of five pre-registered predictions were missed (win rate and profit factor). After one iteration it is now in paper trading.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- 0.86
- Total return
- 69.91%
- Max drawdown
- 12.42%
- Trades
- 309
- Win rate
- 40.8%
- Profit factor
- 1.42
309 closed trades over 8.5 years; all are BTC spot longs, matching the hypothesis.
Net average trade return is 1.04% of notional, above the 0.25% spot fee floor; profit factor is 1.42 and Sharpe is positive.
Trade sizes vary and stay near the stated 49.7% cap.
The run already has a recorded promotion and risk approval, so another optimization would duplicate prior work.
Analysis
Average net trade return is 1.02% of notional on 331 long-only spot trades, against a 0.25% fee floor and a 0.40% promotion gate. Profit factor is 1.44 and the payoff ratio is 2.11.
Max drawdown is 12.4%, against the 18% the hypothesis promised. BTC buy-and-hold fell about 75-80% over the same years, so this is not market exposure passing as an edge. Beta is 0.08 and alpha is +2.4% a year.
The holdout (2024-12 to 2026-10, 71 trades) made money: Sharpe 0.28, drawdown 11.3%. It was not statistically adverse.
The walk-forward tested one fixed parameter set with no search. Pooled out-of-sample Sharpe was 0.95 over 9 windows, 6 of them positive.
Results change little when parameters move. Every point tested at ±10/25/50% kept Sharpe above 0.67. The only flagged cliff (slow_lookback 14 to 13, 1.33 standard errors) is next to a local high, and the base value of 15 is on the plateau.
Risk limits hold. The worst realised loss is 2.16% of equity and the risk check found no violations. The largest position is 51% of equity at 1x on a cash account.
Statistical significance is not established. The holdout t-statistic is 0.36 against a 2.0 hurdle, and the pooled out-of-sample deflated Sharpe could not be computed.
Three walk-forward windows lost money (2021-11 to 2023-09). 2025 lost 1.9%. The holdout Sharpe is about 29% of the walk-forward figure.
The signal shows no forecasting information at the 4-hour horizon (IC -0.021). The edge comes from letting a few winning trends run, not from forecasting direction.
CAGR is a modest 6.5% and Calmar is 0.54. The longest drawdown lasted 825 days.
Two of five pre-registered predictions were missed: win rate 0.405 vs at least 0.42, and profit factor 1.44 vs at least 1.6.
Low confidence, not statistically proven: paper trading only, at reduced allocation, never live money on this evidence. Use the fixed parameters. Review after 30 closed paper trades (about 10 months). Retire if, at that review, average net trade return is below 0.40% or profit factor is below 1.10. Retire at any time if paper drawdown exceeds 18%. Flag for review any single trade that loses more than 3% of equity. Live trading needs a forward record that meets these criteria, or the owner's informed consent.
Risk Review
Statistical significance is not established. The final parameters were not accepted (outcome: not enough out-of-sample significance; the holdout was inconclusive). The final exam on record belongs to an earlier experiment and its window has already been read. This is low-confidence paper admission only and is not evidence for real money.
The ATR trailing stop is checked on the 4H close and sent as a market order. It is not resting at the exchange, so a gap can fill well past the planned level. Planned risk at the stop is risk_pct 1.011% of equity. The worst realised loss was 2.16% of equity (2018-10-10, -4.43% on a 48.75%-of-equity position) and the worst adverse excursion was 2.39%. Both are inside the 2% stop route plus its 1.5x realised allowance, but a fast BTC crash could exceed them.
Drawdown is long rather than deep. Max drawdown was 12.25% at 1x (bootstrap CI 6.4-19.2%, so the 18% pre-registered limit is inside the upper tail). The longest drawdown lasted 845 days, and the strategy had 12 losses in a row. 2018 (-7.5%) and 2022 (-5.9%) lost money, as did the LUNA and FTX windows (-1.5% and -2.7%).
Live book: no strategy is currently in breach, but there are many open execution items. BINANCE has 156 halts with no written cause; Bybit, Bybit spot, OKX spot and Deribit have paper legs that never reached the live book; OKX spot's realised execution cost is more than twice the modeled cost. None is on BINANCE_SPOT itself, but the BINANCE halts should be explained before this strategy's spot leg is mirrored live.
Correlation: this is a long-only port of BtcDualTimeframeMomentumConfluenceLS, so it uses the same signal, parameters and instrument. If the parent is deployed, this strategy's long legs will be close to 1:1 correlated with the parent's long side. Count them as one BTC-momentum risk budget, not two independent strategies.
Two of five pre-registered predictions were missed: win rate (dev 43.1%, checked 40.5%, vs at least 42%) and profit factor (1.44 vs at least 1.6). The win rate is carried by a payoff ratio of about 2.1 (avg win $1,815 vs avg loss $879), which fits trend following. No soft floors are in play. The in-sample Sharpe and win-rate advisories are in their non-blocking soak and need no waiver. deflated_sharpe could not be evaluated and is treated as unknown, not passed.
Paper only, with the low-confidence label. Real money needs forward paper evidence or the owner's informed consent, because no statistical acceptance exists.
Size this strategy and the futures parent BtcDualTimeframeMomentumConfluenceLS together under one BTC-momentum allocation, not as additive independent allocations.
Before going live on BINANCE_SPOT, explain the open BINANCE halts in the live-book self-assessment and confirm the spot mirror path delivers legs (the same failure mode is open on other spot venues).
Outcome Summary
Moving a futures long/short strategy to spot long-only can keep a real per-trade edge, but most of it comes from letting a few trends run rather than from forecasting direction (4-hour IC -0.021), so expect low statistical power and long flat periods: the longest drawdown lasted 825 days and the 2021-11 to 2023-09 windows lost money.
The backtest review chose to optimize, and the analyst then recommended promotion because the per-trade edge was well above the fee floor, drawdown was controlled, parameters were robust and the holdout was profitable. The strategy is now in paper trading, even though significance was not established (holdout t-statistic 0.36 against a 2.0 hurdle; deflated Sharpe could not be computed).
A long-only, 1x BTCUSDT spot version of the promoted futures strategy BtcDualTimeframeMomentumConfluenceLS: it buys BTC when both the 18-bar 4-hour return and the 15-bar daily return are positive, holds USDT otherwise, and exits on a 3.033x ATR trailing stop or when daily momentum turns negative. It was built as the first live-trading candidate for a spot-only venue.
The backtest from 2017-10 to 2026-03 returned +69.9% (CAGR 6.45%) on 309 long trades, with Sharpe 0.86, max drawdown 12.4%, profit factor 1.42, a 40.8% win rate and an average trade return of 1.04% of notional. In the analyst's review, pooled out-of-sample Sharpe was 0.95 across 9 walk-forward windows (6 positive), and the holdout made money at Sharpe 0.28 on 71 trades.
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.