Strategies
ADA 4H Range-Outlier Bullish-Close Long (Single-Bar Range-Percentile Signal)
Outcome: Abandoned
AdaFourHourRangeOutlierBullishCloseLong
Outcome Summary
This strategy tried a novel single-bar mechanism on ADA 4H — buying unusually wide bars that closed near their high as a momentum-injection signal. The implementation was correct (710 entries, none dropped), but the result was break-even and untradeable: profit factor 1.04, Sharpe 0.15 with a CI straddling zero, per-trade return below the futures cost floor, 35.6% impact cost, and only ~$790K capacity. The analyst abandoned it before optimization, noting the conjunction over-fired at ~118 trades/year (versus a projected 35-55), churning fees with no surviving edge, and that the +27% total was front-loaded into 2021/2023 with three straight negative recent years. It was recorded as another marginal, capacity-constrained, decaying single-asset signal — even weaker than the abandoned Keltner siblings.
Hypothesis
Implementation
Long-only single-bar range-outlier with bullish-close confirmation on ADAUSDT.BINANCE USD-M futures, 4H bars, pure OHLCV single feed. Enters LONG when a bar's range (high-low) is at or above the 75th percentile of the trailing 50-bar range distribution AND its close sits in the upper third of the bar's own range (buyers won a momentum-injection bar). The signal is the continuous score (range/avg_range x close_position) recomputed every bar; the percentile + close-position conditions gate entry. Exits on a 1.5x ATR stop, a 2.5x ATR target, a 6% take-profit fallback, or a 12-bar time stop. Sized at 18% equity notional, capped so ATR-stop risk <= 1.5% of equity. leverage 1.0.
Backtest Review
- Sharpe
- 0.15
- Total return
- 26.97%
- Max drawdown
- 18.25%
- Trades
- 710
- Win rate
- 47.9%
- Profit factor
- 1.04
Implemented correctly and trades as specified: 710 range-outlier bullish-close entries, 0 dropped, all long — no code bug; ample raw sample
Essentially no edge: profit_factor 1.037 (≈break-even), Sharpe 0.146 (CI -0.62 to 0.96 straddles 0), win_rate 48%, expectancy +$22/trade (~0.12%, BELOW the 0.15% futures cost floor)
Untradeable at scale: impact_cost_pct 35.6% (impact eats >1/3 of gross), capacity only ~$790K — the edge is real only at near-zero size
Over-fires and churns: 710 trades (~118/yr) vs the hypothesis's projected ~35-55/yr; $17k commission + $8.6k impact, exposure 41%
Front-loaded and decaying: +27% carried by 2021 (+17.8%) and 2023 (+13.1%); 2024/2025/2026 all negative, rolling Sharpe to ~-3 by 2026
Even weaker than the LINK/AVAX Keltner siblings already abandoned (PF 1.08, Sharpe 0.26-0.62)
Outcome Summary
Single-bar geometric breakout signals (range percentile + close position) on a lower-liquidity alt do not generate a deployable edge — the conjunction fires too often to be selective, so it churns fees with no fee-surviving per-trade return and collapses to ~$790K capacity at 35.6% impact, even weaker than the already-abandoned LINK/AVAX Keltner siblings.
The analyst abandoned it at backtest review as no-edge economics plus a structural liquidity limit rather than a bug — the code traded exactly as specified, but the conjunction fired far more often than the projected 35-55/year (~118/year), churning $17k commission and $8.6k impact with a per-trade edge below the cost floor, and optimizing a PF-1.037 base would only fit the 2021/2023 bull and fail the recent holdout.
A long-only single-bar 'momentum-injection' strategy on ADAUSDT 4H perpetual futures (pure OHLCV), buying when a bar's range was in the top quartile of its trailing 50-bar distribution AND its close landed in the upper third of the bar's own range (wide-range + bullish close = buyers won), exiting on ATR stop/target, a percentage take-profit fallback, or a time stop.
Over a 710-trade sample (~118/year, all long, none dropped) it was essentially break-even: profit factor 1.037, Sharpe 0.146 (CI -0.62 to 0.96), win rate 48%, expectancy +$22/trade (~0.12%, below the ~0.15% futures cost floor), 18.3% max drawdown; it was undeployable at scale (impact cost 35.6%, capacity only ~$790K) and front-loaded into 2021 (+17.8%) and 2023 (+13.1%) with 2024/2025/2026 all negative and rolling Sharpe ~-3 by 2026.
Backtest and paper results are hypothetical. Trading involves risk of loss.