Zum Inhalt springen
Alle Bibliotheksdokumente

Vergleichbare gleichgewichtete Tages-Benchmarks erstellen

Code Machine Learning for Trading

Zusammenfassung

Diese Methode zur Benchmark-Erstellung erzeugt eine gleichgewichtete tägliche Renditereihe aus den angegebenen Vermögenswerten einer Fallstudie. Zunächst wird für jedes Symbol der letzte Schlusskurs jeder Sitzung herangezogen; anschließend werden Schlusskurs-zu-Schlusskurs-Renditen berechnet und die verfügbaren Renditen über die Symbole gemittelt. Ein Symbol fließt nur ein, wenn für aufeinanderfolgende Sitzungen Preise vorliegen, wodurch künstliche Renditen vermieden werden, wenn ein Vermögenswert in das beobachtete Panel eintritt oder daraus ausscheidet. Die Benchmark wird auf einem täglichen Raster erstellt, damit ihre Renditen und annualisierten Kennzahlen mit Strategien verglichen werden können, die in derselben Frequenz ausgewertet werden.

Die Methode berücksichtigt außerdem Kapitalmaßnahmen und Datenabdeckung. Wo Bereinigungsfaktoren vorhanden sind, wendet sie diese auf die Preise an; bei nicht bereinigten Wertepaaren filtert sie Renditen, deren Preisverhältnisse gängigen Split-Verhältnissen ähneln. Paare, die die Grenze zwischen bereinigter und nicht bereinigter Preisabdeckung überschreiten, werden entfernt, um Scheinsprünge zu vermeiden. Ein Prüfmodus vergleicht erzeugte Metadaten- und Renditedateien mit den eingecheckten Versionen. Diese Schutzmaßnahmen beseitigen nicht alle Datenrisiken: Die Bereinigungsabdeckung ist begrenzt, und die Verhältnisprüfung kann nur die angegebenen splitähnlichen Bewegungen erkennen. Benchmark-Ergebnisse hängen daher vom gewählten Universum, den Preisquellen und dem Auswertungszeitraum ab.

Kernaussagen

  • Fassen Sie Intraday-Preise zu Tagesschlusskursen zusammen, bevor Sie eine Benchmark für die tägliche Strategiebewertung berechnen.
  • Mitteln Sie die Renditen derselben Sitzung über Symbole mit gültigen Schlusskursen an aufeinanderfolgenden Sitzungen.
  • Bereinigen Sie Preise um Kapitalmaßnahmen, sofern Bereinigungsfaktoren verfügbar sind.
  • Entfernen Sie Preispaare, die Grenzen zwischen bereinigter und nicht bereinigter Abdeckung überschreiten.
  • Prüfen Sie nicht bereinigte Renditen auf splitähnliche Preisverhältnisse und berücksichtigen Sie dabei die Grenzen dieser Heuristik.

Schlagwörter

Volltext
# build_benchmark.py


```py
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Regenerate ``case_studies/<cs>/benchmark/<label>.{parquet,json}``.

These files are the buy-and-hold equal-weight return of the declared universe, and every
strategy in a case study is measured against them through
``case_studies.utils.benchmark.load_benchmark_metrics``. They were committed with no
generator anywhere in the repository (agent-workspace #362), which is how the defects
below survived.

**The benchmark must live on the same grid as the strategy.** The backtester aggregates to
a daily series before it measures anything (``to_daily_returns`` /
``extract_daily_returns_frame``) and ``evaluation.periods_per_year`` annualizes that daily
grid. A benchmark built on the trading cadence and annualized at 252 is not comparable to
it and understates itself by ``sqrt(bars_per_year / periods_per_year)`` - 5.1x on
nasdaq100_microstructure's 15-minute grid, 1.7x on crypto_perps_funding's 8-hour one. So
this compounds to a daily close-to-close return first, which is what the ``method`` field
``daily_cross_sectional_mean_close_pct_change`` has always claimed and what the committed
files did not do.

Usage:
    uv run python scripts/build_benchmark.py --case-study nasdaq100_microstructure
    uv run python scripts/build_benchmark.py --case-study nasdaq100_microstructure --check
"""

from __future__ import annotations

import argparse
import json
import sys
from pathlib import Path

import numpy as np
import polars as pl
import yaml

from utils.cv_splits import generate_cv_splits
from utils.paths import get_case_study_dir

# (loader name in the `data` package, bar frequency to request, loader takes `lazy=`).
# Adding an entry is the whole cost of extending this to a case study; an entry not
# exercised by a regenerated benchmark is not an entry.
_LOADERS: dict[str, tuple[str, str, bool]] = {
    "nasdaq100_microstructure": ("load_nasdaq100_bars", "1m", True),
    "crypto_perps_funding": ("load_crypto_perps", "8h", False),
}

# Case studies whose bars are RAW, so a close-to-close return spans corporate actions.
# AlgoSeek's NASDAQ-100 minute archive carries `last_trade_price` and no adjustment field
# in any of its 63 columns: AAPL closes 499.23 on 2020-08-28 and 129.04 on 2020-08-31, and
# TSLA splits 5:1 three days later, both inside the validation window.
# `load_sp500_daily_bars` publishes a cumulative `adj_factor`, and `close * adj_factor` is
# continuous through the split (AAPL 4044.2 -> 4181.4, the +3.4% it actually traded).
#
# Crypto perpetuals have no corporate actions, so they are absent here by fact rather than
# by omission - and the residual screen below is gated on this mapping for that reason.
_ADJUSTMENT_SOURCE: dict[str, str] = {
    "nasdaq100_microstructure": "load_sp500_daily_bars",
}

# Ratios a residual split shows up as, for symbols the adjustment source does not cover.
# Matching a RATIO rather than thresholding a return is what keeps a genuine -40% session
# in the cross-section: only a move within `_SPLIT_TOLERANCE` of one of these is dropped.
_SPLIT_RATIOS = (1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 10.0, 15.0, 20.0)
_SPLIT_TOLERANCE = 0.02


def _daily_closes(case_study: str, symbols: list[str], start: str, end: str) -> pl.DataFrame:
    """Last traded close per symbol per session, over ``[start, end]``."""
    if case_study not in _LOADERS:
        raise NotImplementedError(
            f"{case_study} has no loader registered in _LOADERS. Add the loader that "
            f"reads its price panel, then regenerate and commit its benchmark files - do "
            f"not leave the committed ones in place, they have no generator behind them."
        )
    import data as _data

    name, frequency, takes_lazy = _LOADERS[case_study]
    kwargs: dict = dict(frequency=frequency, symbols=symbols, start_date=start, end_date=end)
    if takes_lazy:
        kwargs["lazy"] = True
    frame = getattr(_data, name)(**kwargs)
    lf = frame.lazy() if isinstance(frame, pl.DataFrame) else frame
    return (
        lf.select(["timestamp", "symbol", "close"])
        .with_columns(pl.col("timestamp").dt.date().alias("date"))
        .group_by(["symbol", "date"])
        .agg(pl.col("close").sort_by("timestamp").last())
        .collect(engine="streaming")
    )


def _apply_adjustment(case_study: str, closes: pl.DataFrame, symbols: list[str]) -> pl.DataFrame:
    """Attach ``adj_close`` and the ``adj_factor`` that produced it, where one exists."""
    if case_study not in _ADJUSTMENT_SOURCE:
        return closes.with_columns(
            pl.col("close").alias("adj_close"),
            pl.lit(None, dtype=pl.Float64).alias("adj_factor"),
        )

    import data as _data

    factors = (
        getattr(_data, _ADJUSTMENT_SOURCE[case_study])(
            start_date=str(closes["date"].min()),
            end_date=str(closes["date"].max()),
            symbols=symbols,
        )
        .select(
            pl.col("timestamp").cast(pl.Date).alias("date"),
            "symbol",
            pl.col("adj_factor").cast(pl.Float64),
        )
        .unique(subset=["symbol", "date"], keep="first")
    )
    print(
        f"  adjustment: {factors['symbol'].n_unique()} of {closes['symbol'].n_unique()} "
        f"symbols carry an adj_factor; the rest are screened for residual split ratios"
    )
    return closes.join(factors, on=["symbol", "date"], how="left").with_columns(
        pl.when(pl.col("adj_factor").is_not_null())
        .then(pl.col("close") * pl.col("adj_factor"))
        .otherwise(pl.col("close"))
        .alias("adj_close")
    )


def _drop_residual_splits(per_symbol: pl.DataFrame) -> tuple[pl.DataFrame, int]:
    """Null out returns whose raw price ratio is a split ratio, for unadjusted pairs.

    A pair with a factor at both ends is already continuous and is never screened.
    """
    ratio = pl.col("prev_close") / pl.col("close")
    is_split = pl.lit(False)
    for r in _SPLIT_RATIOS:
        for cand in (r, 1.0 / r):
            is_split = is_split | ((ratio / cand - 1.0).abs() < _SPLIT_TOLERANCE)
    flagged = per_symbol.with_columns((is_split & pl.col("unadjusted_pair")).alias("split"))
    return flagged.filter(~pl.col("split")), int(flagged["split"].sum())


def _equal_weight_daily(closes: pl.DataFrame, screen_splits: bool = True) -> pl.DataFrame:
    """Cross-sectional equal-weight mean of each symbol's daily close-to-close return.

    A symbol contributes on a session only when it has a close on that session AND on the
    one before it, so a listing or a delisting never enters as a return.

    **Both endpoints must be on the same price scale.** Falling back to the raw close
    per row divides an adjusted price by an unadjusted one wherever factor coverage
    starts, ends or has a hole: unchanged closes of 100 with factors [8, null, 8] read as
    -87.5% then +700%, and the residual screen cannot see it because the RAW ratio is
    exactly 1. A pair straddling a coverage boundary is dropped, not approximated.
    """
    covered = pl.col("adj_factor").is_not_null()
    per_symbol = (
        closes.sort(["symbol", "date"])
        .with_columns(
            pl.col("adj_close").shift(1).over("symbol").alias("prev_adj"),
            pl.col("close").shift(1).over("symbol").alias("prev_close"),
            covered.alias("covered"),
            covered.shift(1).over("symbol").alias("prev_covered"),
        )
        .with_columns(
            pl.when(pl.col("covered") & pl.col("prev_covered"))
            .then(pl.col("adj_close") / pl.col("prev_adj") - 1.0)
            .when(~pl.col("covered") & ~pl.col("prev_covered"))
            .then(pl.col("close") / pl.col("prev_close") - 1.0)
            .otherwise(None)
            .alias("ret"),
            (~pl.col("covered") & ~pl.col("prev_covered")).alias("unadjusted_pair"),
        )
        .drop_nulls("ret")
    )
    n_split = 0
    if screen_splits:
        per_symbol, n_split = _drop_residual_splits(per_symbol)
    if n_split:
        print(f"  dropped {n_split} symbol-session(s) whose price ratio is a split ratio")
    return (
        per_symbol.group_by("date")
        .agg(pl.col("ret").mean().alias("ew_return"), pl.len().alias("n_symbols"))
        .sort("date")
    )


def _metrics(returns: np.ndarray, periods_per_year: int) -> dict:
    if returns.size < 2:
        return {"sharpe": None, "cagr": None, "vol": None, "n_periods": int(returns.size)}
    sd = float(np.std(returns, ddof=1))
    cum = float(np.prod(1.0 + returns) - 1.0)
    return {
        "sharpe": round(float(np.mean(returns) / sd * np.sqrt(periods_per_year)), 6)
        if sd > 0
        else None,
        "cagr": round(float((1.0 + cum) ** (periods_per_year / returns.size) - 1.0), 6),
        "vol": round(sd * float(np.sqrt(periods_per_year)), 6),
        "n_periods": int(returns.size),
    }


def _evaluation_start(case_study: str, label_path: Path):
    """First session the strategy is measured over, from the splitter itself.

    ``WalkForwardCV`` builds folds BACKWARD from the holdout boundary using ``n_splits``
    and ``val_size``, so advancing the label's first session by ``train_size`` lands in
    the wrong place - on nasdaq it gives 2020-07-02 against the splitter's 2020-06-30,
    silently dropping two evaluated sessions.
    """
    folds = generate_cv_splits(
        pl.scan_parquet(label_path).select("timestamp").unique().collect(),
        case_study_id=case_study,
        date_col="timestamp",
    )
    first = min(f["val_start"] for f in folds)
    return first.date() if hasattr(first, "date") else first


def build(case_study: str, check: bool) -> int:
    case_dir = get_case_study_dir(case_study)
    setup = yaml.safe_load((case_dir / "config" / "setup.yaml").read_text())
    symbols = list(setup["universe"]["symbols"])
    ppy = int(setup["evaluation"]["periods_per_year"])
    holdout_start = pl.Series([str(setup["evaluation"]["holdout_start"])[:10]]).str.to_date()[0]
    holdout_end = pl.Series([str(setup["evaluation"]["holdout_end"])[:10]]).str.to_date()[0]

    labels_dir, bench_dir = case_dir / "labels", case_dir / "benchmark"
    label_files = sorted(labels_dir.glob("*.parquet"))
    if not label_files:
        print(f"{case_study}: no label parquets under {labels_dir}", file=sys.stderr)
        return 1

    spans = {}
    for lf in label_files:
        hi = (
            pl.scan_parquet(lf)
            .select(pl.col("timestamp").dt.date().max().alias("hi"))
            .collect()["hi"][0]
        )
        spans[lf.stem] = (_evaluation_start(case_study, lf), hi)

    lo = min(v[0] for v in spans.values())
    hi = max(v[1] for v in spans.values())
    # A year of run-up so the first evaluated session has a prior close to price against.
    closes = _daily_closes(case_study, symbols, str(lo.replace(year=lo.year - 1)), str(hi))
    closes = _apply_adjustment(case_study, closes, symbols)
    ew_all = _equal_weight_daily(closes, screen_splits=case_study in _ADJUSTMENT_SOURCE)

    failures = 0
    for label, (l_lo, l_hi) in sorted(spans.items()):
        ew = ew_all.filter((pl.col("date") >= l_lo) & (pl.col("date") <= l_hi))
        is_hold = (ew["date"] >= holdout_start) & (ew["date"] <= holdout_end)
        r = ew["ew_return"].to_numpy()
        val_rows, hold_rows = ew.filter(~is_hold), ew.filter(is_hold)
        validation = _metrics(val_rows["ew_return"].to_numpy(), ppy)

        meta = {
            "case_study": case_study,
            "label": label,
            "method": "daily_cross_sectional_mean_close_pct_change",
            "periods_per_year": ppy,
            "n_symbols_declared": len(symbols),
            "n_symbols_in_universe": int(
                closes.filter(
                    (pl.col("date") >= ew["date"].min()) & (pl.col("date") <= ew["date"].max())
                )["symbol"].n_unique()
            ),
            **validation,
            "ts_min": str(ew["date"].min()),
            "ts_max": str(ew["date"].max()),
            "by_period": {
                "overall": _metrics(r, ppy),
                "validation": validation,
                "holdout": _metrics(hold_rows["ew_return"].to_numpy(), ppy),
                "validation_window": [str(val_rows["date"].min()), str(val_rows["date"].max())],
                "holdout_window": [str(hold_rows["date"].min()), str(hold_rows["date"].max())],
            },
        }
        pq, js = bench_dir / f"{label}.parquet", bench_dir / f"{label}.json"
        frame = ew.select(pl.col("date").alias("timestamp"), "ew_return")

        if check:
            # Compare EVERYTHING a consumer reads. Checking only the overall block lets a
            # moved holdout boundary report MATCHES while the validation and holdout
            # blocks load_benchmark_metrics actually returns are stale.
            was = json.loads(js.read_text()) if js.exists() else {}
            diffs = [k for k in meta if k != "by_period" and was.get(k) != meta[k]]
            diffs += [
                f"by_period.{k}"
                for k in meta["by_period"]
                if was.get("by_period", {}).get(k) != meta["by_period"][k]
            ]
            # "parquet" is not a metadata key, so it is kept out of the lookup below
            # entirely rather than appended to `diffs`, where meta[k] would raise
            # KeyError and abort every remaining label.
            parquet_note = None
            if not pq.exists():
                parquet_note = f"  parquet: missing, would write {frame.height} rows"
            elif not pl.read_parquet(pq).equals(frame):
                parquet_note = (
                    f"  parquet: committed {pl.read_parquet(pq).height} rows against {frame.height}"
                )
            print(f"{label}: {'DIFFERS' if diffs or parquet_note else 'MATCHES'} committed")
            for k in diffs:
                failures += 1
                if k.startswith("by_period."):
                    inner = k.split(".", 1)[1]
                    print(
                        f"  {k}: {was.get('by_period', {}).get(inner)} -> {meta['by_period'][inner]}"
                    )
                else:
                    print(f"  {k}: {was.get(k)} -> {meta[k]}")
            if parquet_note:
                failures += 1
                print(parquet_note)
            continue

        bench_dir.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
        frame.write_parquet(pq)
        js.write_text(json.dumps(meta, indent=2) + "\n")
        print(
            f"{label}: {frame.height} sessions, {meta['n_symbols_in_universe']} symbols, "
            f"overall {meta['by_period']['overall']['sharpe']}, "
            f"validation {validation['sharpe']}, "
            f"holdout {meta['by_period']['holdout']['sharpe']}"
        )
    return 1 if (check and failures) else 0


if __name__ == "__main__":
    ap = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
    ap.add_argument("--case-study", required=True)
    ap.add_argument("--check", action="store_true", help="compare with the committed files")
    args = ap.parse_args()
    raise SystemExit(build(args.case_study, args.check))

```

Vollständig mit Quellenangabe unter der Lizenz der Quelle angezeigt. Lizenz: MIT

Diese Zusammenfassung wurde vom Research-Agenten von Stratmill anhand des Originals verfasst; sie ist keine Kopie der Quelle.