Zum Inhalt springen
Alle Bibliotheksdokumente

Zuverlässige Walk-Forward-Validierung und zeitliche Merkmalsabdeckung

Code Machine Learning for Trading

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Code definiert Schutzmaßnahmen für reproduzierbare Kreuzvalidierung, die Nachverfolgung der Eignung und zeitlich auf Folds begrenzte Merkmale. Er normalisiert Fold-Grenzen, vergleicht angeforderte Folds mit den Grenzen, die zur Erstellung zeitlicher Artefakte verwendet wurden, und lehnt unvereinbare Geometrien ab. Bei Holdouts prüft er, ob zeitliche Merkmalszeilen die erforderlichen Trainings- und Evaluierungsdaten einschließlich des Evaluierungsendpunkts abdecken, und stellt sicher, dass ein festgelegter Schätzstichtag vor dem Bewertungsfenster liegt.

Ein Eignungsmanifest erfasst Entitäts-, Zeitstempel- und Fold-Schlüssel samt Schema, Quellen- und Logikidentität, Anzahlen und sortierten Prüfsummen. Eine aufgelöste CV-Spezifikation kombiniert den angeforderten Zeitplan mit generierten Fold-Grenzen und, sofern bereitgestellt, dem Eignungsmanifest zu einer stabilen Identität. Diese Mechanismen helfen, fehlende Beobachtungen, veränderte Populationen und Risiken zeitlicher Datenlecks aufzudecken. Der Auszug beschreibt Infrastruktur und keine Trading-Strategie; die Prüfungen hängen teilweise von den angegebenen Folds und der festgelegten Dateiidentität des Artefakterstellers ab.

Kernaussagen

  • Zeitlich auf Folds begrenzte Merkmale dürfen nur wiederverwendet werden, wenn angeforderte Fold-Grenzen mit ihrer ursprünglichen Geometrie übereinstimmen.
  • Holdout-Abdeckungsprüfungen verlangen zeitliche Zeilen über Trainings- und Evaluierungsfenster hinweg und schließen den Evaluierungsendpunkt ein.
  • Ein festgelegter zeitlicher Schätzzeitraum muss enden, bevor das Holdout-Evaluierungsfenster beginnt.
  • Eignungsmanifeste erfassen eindeutige Schlüssel, Schema, Quellenidentität, Logikidentität und Prüfsummen je Fold.
  • Aufgelöste CV-Identitäten kombinieren die Anfrage, normalisierte Folds und optionale Eignungsinformationen.

Schlagwörter

Volltext
# cv.py


```py
from __future__ import annotations

from collections.abc import Sequence
from dataclasses import dataclass, field, replace
from datetime import UTC, datetime
from typing import Any

from case_studies.utils.artifact_digest import value_digest
from case_studies.utils.registry.specs import canonical_json, canonical_value, compute_hash
from utils.cv_splits import generate_cv_splits


def _normalize_boundary(value: Any) -> str:
    raw = value.isoformat() if hasattr(value, "isoformat") else str(value)
    try:
        boundary = datetime.fromisoformat(raw.replace("Z", "+00:00"))
    except ValueError:
        return raw
    if boundary.tzinfo is not None:
        boundary = boundary.astimezone(UTC).replace(tzinfo=None)
    return boundary.isoformat()


def require_fold_scoped_temporal_compatibility(
    requested_folds: list[dict[str, Any]],
    artifact_folds: list[dict[str, Any]],
) -> None:
    """Reject CV geometry that cannot reuse fold-scoped temporal features."""
    fields = ("fold", "train_start", "train_end", "val_start", "val_end")

    def normalize(split: dict[str, Any]) -> dict[str, Any]:
        return {
            field: int(split[field]) if field == "fold" else _normalize_boundary(split[field])
            for field in fields
        }

    source = {int(split["fold"]): normalize(split) for split in artifact_folds}
    incompatible = [
        normalize(split)
        for split in requested_folds
        if source.get(int(split["fold"])) != normalize(split)
    ]
    if incompatible:
        raise ValueError(
            "custom CV is incompatible with fold-scoped temporal features; "
            "use the artifact's original fold boundaries"
        )


def require_fold_scoped_temporal_holdout_coverage(
    requested_fold: dict[str, Any],
    temporal_by_fold: Any,
    *,
    source_timeline: Any,
    declared_folds: Sequence[dict[str, Any]],
    date_col: str = "timestamp",
    fold_col: str = "fold",
) -> None:
    """Require an existing temporal fold to cover the holdout's training and evaluation windows.

    ``require_fold_scoped_temporal_compatibility`` asks whether the artifact declares a fold with
    the requested geometry. For a holdout that question has no good answer. The holdout fold is
    derived when the lock is taken, so the artifact - built during stage 04, before any lock -
    never declares it, and the artifact cannot be rebuilt to add it: the lock pins the feature
    file by whole-file sha256, so writing the fold in changes the digest the selection was made
    under. Compatibility therefore refuses every holdout lock on a case study with fold-scoped
    model-based features.

    Coverage is the question that can be answered. The model-based features are joined by
    ``(entity, date)``, so what the holdout run actually needs is not a fold labelled for it but
    rows spanning the dates it will train and evaluate on. This checks exactly that, against the
    fold the derived holdout CV names, and it is strictly the stronger check where both apply:
    a fold with matching boundaries but missing rows passes compatibility and fails here.

    ``declared_folds`` is the artifact's own ``temporal_artifact_splits``. It is required
    rather than optional so a new caller has to decide rather than silently lose the check.
    Where it declares a fold with the requested id - which a producer that appends its holdout
    rows *and* declares their geometry gives it - the declared
    ``train_end`` must fall before the requested fold's evaluation window opens, or the
    feature estimator saw the sessions the holdout is scored on. Where it does not, coverage
    is all that can be asked and the boundary rests on the producer's own assertion, which is
    inside the sha256 the artifact is pinned by.

    One difference that reads as a leak and is not: the model's training window ends a label
    buffer earlier than the feature estimator's, because the buffer pulls the label cutoff
    back. Features on the model's training rows therefore embed sessions after its label
    cutoff and before the holdout opens - fresher than the labels beside them, and drawn
    entirely from outside the evaluated window, so they cannot move the holdout number. The
    check below is against the *evaluation* window for exactly that reason.
    """
    import polars as pl

    from utils.modeling import validate_temporal_fold_coverage

    columns = [fold_col, date_col]
    if isinstance(temporal_by_fold, pl.LazyFrame):
        frame = temporal_by_fold.select(columns).collect()
    elif isinstance(temporal_by_fold, pl.DataFrame):
        frame = temporal_by_fold.select(columns)
    else:
        frame = pl.from_pandas(temporal_by_fold.loc[:, columns])
    fold_id = int(requested_fold["fold"])
    dates = frame.filter(pl.col(fold_col) == fold_id).get_column(date_col)
    if dates.is_empty():
        raise ValueError(f"fold-scoped temporal artifact has no holdout fold {fold_id}")
    dtype = dates.dtype

    def boundary(name: str) -> Any:
        value = requested_fold[name]
        if isinstance(value, str):
            value = datetime.fromisoformat(value)
        return pl.Series([value]).cast(dtype, strict=False).item()

    train_start, train_end = boundary("train_start"), boundary("train_end")
    val_start, val_end = boundary("val_start"), boundary("val_end")

    declared = next((fold for fold in declared_folds if int(fold["fold"]) == fold_id), None)
    if declared is not None:
        raw_train_end = declared["train_end"]
        if isinstance(raw_train_end, str):
            raw_train_end = datetime.fromisoformat(raw_train_end)
        declared_train_end = pl.Series([raw_train_end]).cast(dtype, strict=False).item()
        if declared_train_end >= val_start:
            raise ValueError(
                f"fold-scoped temporal artifact declares fold {fold_id} fitted through "
                f"{declared_train_end}, which reaches the holdout evaluation window opening "
                f"{val_start}: the feature estimator saw the sessions this holdout is "
                "scored on"
            )

    if not dates.is_between(train_start, train_end, closed="both").any():
        raise ValueError("fold-scoped temporal holdout has no requested training rows")
    if isinstance(source_timeline, pl.Series):
        source_dates = source_timeline.cast(dtype, strict=False)
    else:
        source_dates = pl.Series(source_timeline).cast(dtype, strict=False)
    expected = source_dates.filter(source_dates.is_between(val_start, val_end, closed="both"))
    if expected.is_empty():
        raise ValueError("source data has no observations in the holdout evaluation window")

    source_frame = pl.DataFrame({date_col: source_dates})
    temporal_frame = frame.rename({fold_col: "fold"}) if fold_col != "fold" else frame
    validate_temporal_fold_coverage(
        source_frame,
        temporal_frame,
        [requested_fold],
        date_col=date_col,
    )

    # The endpoint, specifically: a temporal artifact that stops one session short of the holdout
    # window's last observation would otherwise pass every check above, and the holdout would be
    # evaluated on a shorter period than the one the lock declares.
    evaluation = dates.filter(dates.is_between(val_start, val_end, closed="both"))
    if evaluation.is_empty() or not evaluation.eq(expected.max()).any():
        raise ValueError("fold-scoped temporal holdout does not cover the evaluation endpoint")


@dataclass(frozen=True)
class EligibilityManifest:
    entity_schema: dict[str, Any]
    source_identity: dict[str, Any]
    logic_identity: dict[str, Any]
    n_eligible: int
    sorted_key_digest: str
    folds: tuple[dict[str, Any], ...]
    eligible_keys: Any = field(repr=False, compare=False)

    @classmethod
    def resolve(
        cls,
        keys,
        *,
        entity_columns: tuple[str, ...] = ("symbol",),
        timestamp_column: str = "timestamp",
        fold_column: str = "fold",
        source_identity: dict[str, Any],
        logic_identity: dict[str, Any],
        diagnostics_by_fold: dict[int, dict[str, Any]] | None = None,
    ) -> EligibilityManifest:
        import polars as pl

        frame = keys if isinstance(keys, pl.DataFrame) else pl.from_pandas(keys)
        key_columns = [*entity_columns, timestamp_column, fold_column]
        missing = set(key_columns) - set(frame.columns)
        if missing:
            raise ValueError(f"eligibility keys are missing columns: {sorted(missing)}")
        if not entity_columns:
            raise ValueError("eligibility manifest requires at least one entity column")
        selected = frame.select(key_columns)
        if selected.null_count().row(0) != tuple(0 for _ in key_columns):
            raise ValueError("eligibility keys cannot contain null values")
        if selected.n_unique(key_columns) != selected.height:
            raise ValueError("eligibility keys must be unique")
        selected = selected.sort(key_columns)
        diagnostics = diagnostics_by_fold or {}
        fold_records = []
        for fold_id in sorted(selected.get_column(fold_column).unique().to_list()):
            fold_keys = selected.filter(pl.col(fold_column) == fold_id)
            fold_records.append(
                {
                    "fold": int(fold_id),
                    "n_eligible": fold_keys.height,
                    "sorted_key_digest": value_digest(fold_keys, tuple(key_columns)),
                    "diagnostics": canonical_value(diagnostics.get(int(fold_id), {})),
                }
            )
        return cls(
            entity_schema={
                "entity_columns": list(entity_columns),
                "timestamp": timestamp_column,
                "fold": fold_column,
                "dtypes": {column: str(selected.schema[column]) for column in key_columns},
            },
            source_identity=canonical_value(source_identity),
            logic_identity=canonical_value(logic_identity),
            n_eligible=selected.height,
            sorted_key_digest=value_digest(selected, tuple(key_columns)),
            folds=tuple(fold_records),
            eligible_keys=selected,
        )

    def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
        return {
            "entity_schema": self.entity_schema,
            "source_identity": self.source_identity,
            "logic_identity": self.logic_identity,
            "n_eligible": self.n_eligible,
            "sorted_key_digest": self.sorted_key_digest,
            "folds": list(self.folds),
        }


@dataclass(frozen=True)
class ResolvedCVSpec:
    request: dict[str, Any]
    normalized_folds: tuple[dict[str, Any], ...]
    identity: str
    eligibility: EligibilityManifest | None = None

    def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]:
        resolved = {
            "request": self.request,
            "folds": list(self.normalized_folds),
            "identity": self.identity,
        }
        if self.eligibility is not None:
            resolved["eligibility"] = self.eligibility.as_dict()
        return resolved


@dataclass(frozen=True)
class CVSpec:
    training_window: int | float | str | None
    validation_window: int | float | str
    retrain_every: int | str | None
    folds: tuple[int, ...]
    expanding: bool = False
    horizon: str = "0D"
    gap: str | None = None
    holdout_start: str | None = None
    holdout_end: str | None = None
    calendar: str | None = None
    decision_cadence: str | None = None

    def __post_init__(self) -> None:
        normalized_folds = tuple(sorted({int(fold) for fold in self.folds}))
        if not normalized_folds or normalized_folds[0] < 0:
            raise ValueError("folds must contain at least one non-negative fold id")
        object.__setattr__(self, "folds", normalized_folds)

    @classmethod
    def walk_forward(
        cls,
        *,
        training_window: int | float | str | None,
        validation_window: int | float | str,
        retrain_every: int | str | None = None,
        folds=None,
        expanding: bool = False,
        horizon: str = "0D",
        gap: str | None = None,
        holdout_start: str | None = None,
        holdout_end: str | None = None,
        calendar: str | None = None,
        decision_cadence: str | None = None,
    ) -> CVSpec:
        normalized_folds = tuple(int(fold) for fold in (range(5) if folds is None else folds))
        return cls(
            training_window=training_window,
            validation_window=validation_window,
            retrain_every=retrain_every,
            folds=normalized_folds,
            expanding=expanding,
            horizon=horizon,
            gap=gap,
            holdout_start=holdout_start,
            holdout_end=holdout_end,
            calendar=calendar,
            decision_cadence=decision_cadence,
        )

    def with_changes(self, **changes) -> CVSpec:
        return replace(self, **changes)

    def resolve(
        self,
        timeline,
        *,
        date_col: str = "timestamp",
        eligibility: EligibilityManifest | None = None,
    ) -> ResolvedCVSpec:
        step_size = self.retrain_every
        if isinstance(step_size, str):
            if step_size != self.validation_window:
                raise ValueError(
                    "a distinct retrain_every duration must be expressed as an integer "
                    "observation step for the existing splitter"
                )
            step_size = None
        config = {
            "n_splits": max(self.folds) + 1,
            "train_size": self.training_window,
            "val_size": self.validation_window,
            "holdout_start": self.holdout_start,
            "holdout_end": self.holdout_end,
            "calendar": self.calendar,
            "step_size": step_size,
            "expanding": self.expanding,
        }
        generated = generate_cv_splits(
            timeline,
            label_buffer=self.gap or self.horizon,
            outcome_horizon=self.horizon,
            date_col=date_col,
            cv_config=config,
        )
        selected = [split for split in generated if int(split["fold"]) in self.folds]
        if len(selected) != len(self.folds):
            raise ValueError("requested folds were not all produced by the existing CV generator")
        normalized = tuple(
            {
                "fold": int(split["fold"]),
                "train_start": _normalize_boundary(split["train_start"]),
                "train_end": _normalize_boundary(split["train_end"]),
                "val_start": _normalize_boundary(split["val_start"]),
                "val_end": _normalize_boundary(split["val_end"]),
            }
            for split in selected
        )
        request = {
            "training_window": self.training_window,
            "validation_window": self.validation_window,
            "retrain_every": self.retrain_every,
            "folds": list(self.folds),
            "expanding": self.expanding,
            "horizon": self.horizon,
            "gap": self.gap or self.horizon,
            "holdout_start": self.holdout_start,
            "holdout_end": self.holdout_end,
            "calendar": self.calendar,
            "decision_cadence": self.decision_cadence,
        }
        if eligibility is not None:
            eligible_folds = {fold["fold"] for fold in eligibility.folds}
            if eligible_folds != set(self.folds):
                raise ValueError(
                    "eligibility manifest folds do not match the resolved CV request: "
                    f"{sorted(eligible_folds)} != {list(self.folds)}"
                )
        identity_input = {"request": request, "folds": normalized}
        if eligibility is not None:
            identity_input["eligibility"] = eligibility.as_dict()
        identity = compute_hash(canonical_json(identity_input))
        return ResolvedCVSpec(request, normalized, identity, eligibility)

```

Vollständig mit Quellenangabe unter der Lizenz der Quelle angezeigt. Lizenz: MIT

Diese Zusammenfassung wurde vom Research-Agenten von Stratmill anhand des Originals verfasst; sie ist keine Kopie der Quelle.