OHLCVデータ向けCSV、Parquet、Feather、HDF5のベンチマーク
ノートブック Machine Learning for Trading
サマリー
同一の決定論的なOHLCVパネルを用いて、CSV、Parquet、Feather(Arrow IPC)、HDF5を比較します。書き込み時間、メモリに展開した読み込み時間、ファイルサイズ、選択列だけを読む効果を測定します。計測では書き込みを1回行い、ウォームアップ後に複数回読み込んだ平均を使うため、読み込みはウォームキャッシュの測定値です。Featherのメモリマップによるオープン時間は、データ展開の時間と分けて報告し、読み込みコストと取り違えないようにしています。
結果はトレードオフを示すことを意図しており、どの条件でも勝る形式を1つ挙げるものではありません。列の選択読み込みはParquetとFeatherで有効ですが、CSVは行をまたいでフィールドを解析する必要があり、固定形式のHDF5は列の選択読み込みに対応しません。長期保存やクラウド保存にはParquet、ローカルでのデータ受け渡しにはFeatherを使うなど、用途別の形式選びを提案します。比較は単一パネル、ローカル環境、ウォームキャッシュでの反復アクセスに限られます。キャッシュが効いていないディスク、ネットワーク、オブジェクトストレージでは相対性能が変わる可能性があります。圧縮で保存容量は減りますが、読み込み後のデータフレームが使用するメモリー量は減りません。
主なアイデア
- 形式を公平に比較するには、同じデータセットと一貫した計測ルールを使います。
- メモリマップによるオープン時間は、データをメモリーに展開した読み込み時間とは比較できません。
- 列の選択読み込みはParquetとFeatherで読み込み処理を減らせますが、固定形式のHDF5は対応していません。
- どの形式も、あらゆる条件で読み込み速度、書き込み速度、保存容量のすべてに優れるわけではありません。
- ローカルでのウォーム読み込みではメモリマップ形式が有利になる場合がありますが、キャッシュが効いていない環境やリモートアクセスでは順位が変わり得ます。
タグ
全文
# File-Format Storage Benchmark
# File-Format Storage Benchmark
**Environment**: the locked environment (`uv run`) — see Prerequisites below.
**Purpose**: Compare CSV, Parquet, Feather (Arrow IPC), and HDF5 on the same
1 M-row OHLCV panel along three axes — write time, read time (with forced
materialization), and on-disk size — so the trade-offs in §2.4 are
reproducible end to end.
**Learning objectives**:
1. Generate a deterministic OHLCV benchmark panel at the L scale that
chapter §2.4 cites (100 symbols × 10,000 one-minute bars = 1,000,000 rows).
2. Time write and read for each format under one stated timing policy.
3. Force materialization on Feather / HDF5 reads so memory-mapped or lazy
reads don't masquerade as instant.
4. Quantify the columnar-projection win (read 2 columns vs 9).
5. Render a 3-panel comparison (read time / write time / file size).
**Book reference**: §2.4 — file-based storage benchmarks.
**Prerequisites**: PyTables (the HDF5 backend) ships in the locked
environment, so `uv run python 02_financial_data_universe/20_storage_benchmark_file.py`
from the repo root is all this notebook needs — no database services, unlike
`21_storage_benchmark_database`.
> **Which environment produced the numbers**: the locked environment
> (`uv sync`, i.e. `uv.lock`), which is what §2.4 reports. The `benchmark`
> Docker image currently resolves a *newer* pandas than `uv.lock` pins, and
> pandas' newer string dtype makes PyTables store the low-cardinality
> `symbol` column about 8 bytes/row wider — enough to move the HDF5 file
> from ~71 MB to ~79 MB for the identical panel. CSV, Parquet, and Feather
> are unaffected. Run this notebook under `uv run` to reproduce §2.4.
## Setup
```python
"""File-format storage benchmark — CSV / Parquet / Feather / HDF5 at L scale."""
import gc
import os
import time
```
### Declared parameters
`BENCHMARK_SCALE` selects the panel size. The production setting is the one §2.4 quotes,
and CI overrides it to the small scale through Papermill; `ACTIVE_SCALE` and the printed
row count below say which one produced the numbers on the page.
```python
BENCHMARK_SCALE = "L"
```
`utils.storage_benchmarks` reads the scale from the environment when it is imported, so
the variable has to be set before the import rather than passed to a function afterwards.
```python
os.environ["BENCHMARK_SCALE"] = BENCHMARK_SCALE
import pandas as pd
import plotly.graph_objects as go
import polars as pl
# PyTables is the HDF5 backend; raise loudly if the image is wrong.
import tables # noqa: F401
from plotly.subplots import make_subplots
from utils.paths import get_output_dir
from utils.storage_benchmarks import (
ACTIVE_SCALE,
BENCHMARK_DIR,
N_ROWS_PER_SYMBOL,
N_SYMBOLS,
BenchmarkResult,
estimate_memory_mb,
force_materialize_pandas,
force_materialize_polars,
generate_ohlcv_data,
save_benchmark_results,
time_read,
time_write,
validate_result,
)
from utils.style import COLORS, show_plotly_with_alt
OUTPUT_DIR = get_output_dir(2, "storage_benchmark")
OUTPUT_DIR.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True)
```
## Timing Policy
Every number below follows one policy, applied identically to all four
formats. A comparison that mixes policies across the things it compares is
not a comparison, so this is stated up front rather than left in the call
sites:
- **Writes** (`time_write`) — a single shot, no warm-up run. Writing the
panel is a once-per-dataset operation, so that is what we time.
- **Reads** (`time_read`) — the mean of `TIMING_RUNS` runs after one untimed
warm-up run. **These are warm-cache numbers.** The file has just been
written and re-read repeatedly, so it sits in the OS page cache.
Warm-cache reads are the honest description of the *repeated-access* pattern
a research loop actually has, but they flatter memory-mapped formats: Feather
maps pages that are already resident, so its read number below is close to a
best case. A first read of a cold file off disk narrows the gap to Parquet,
and on a network or object store the compressed format usually wins outright
because it moves fewer bytes. Rankings here are for warm, local, repeated
reads — the caveat that §2.4 attaches to these figures.
## 1. Generate the Benchmark Panel
`generate_ohlcv_data` returns a deterministic OHLCV panel: per-symbol random
walks under a fixed seed so format comparisons aren't muddled by data drift
across runs. At L scale that's 100 symbols × 10,000 one-minute bars =
1 M total rows, laid out over 26 regular trading sessions (390 bars each), so
the panel carries the overnight and weekend gaps real minute data has. All
symbols share the session grid, as they do in any synchronized bar panel.
```python
ohlcv_df = generate_ohlcv_data(n_symbols=N_SYMBOLS, n_rows=N_ROWS_PER_SYMBOL)
ohlcv_pandas = ohlcv_df.to_pandas()
panel_summary = pl.DataFrame(
{
"field": [
"scale",
"symbols",
"rows per symbol",
"total rows",
"in-memory size (Polars, MB)",
"in-memory size (pandas, MB)",
],
"value": [
ACTIVE_SCALE,
f"{N_SYMBOLS:,}",
f"{N_ROWS_PER_SYMBOL:,}",
f"{len(ohlcv_df):,}",
f"{estimate_memory_mb(ohlcv_df):.2f}",
f"{estimate_memory_mb(ohlcv_pandas):.2f}",
],
}
)
panel_summary
```
```python
total_rows = len(ohlcv_df)
results: list[BenchmarkResult] = []
```
## 2. CSV — Universal Baseline
CSV is the row-oriented baseline: human-readable, no compression, no schema.
Every other format is judged against it.
```python
csv_path = BENCHMARK_DIR / f"ohlcv_{ACTIVE_SCALE.lower()}.csv"
write_time, _ = time_write(lambda: ohlcv_df.write_csv(csv_path))
csv_size = csv_path.stat().st_size
results.append(BenchmarkResult("CSV", "write", write_time, csv_size, total_rows))
def read_csv_materialized() -> pl.DataFrame:
return force_materialize_polars(pl.read_csv(csv_path))
read_time, csv_result = time_read(read_csv_materialized)
validate_result(csv_result, total_rows, "CSV read")
results.append(BenchmarkResult("CSV", "read", read_time, csv_size, total_rows))
def read_csv_columnar() -> pl.DataFrame:
return force_materialize_polars(pl.read_csv(csv_path, columns=["close", "volume"]))
columnar_time, _ = time_read(read_csv_columnar)
results.append(BenchmarkResult("CSV", "columnar_read", columnar_time, csv_size, total_rows))
```
## 3. Parquet — Compressed Columnar Standard
Parquet's row-group layout, dictionary encoding, and Snappy compression make
it the default for analytical workloads. Column projection reads only the
row-group chunks for the requested columns.
```python
parquet_path = BENCHMARK_DIR / f"ohlcv_{ACTIVE_SCALE.lower()}.parquet"
write_time, _ = time_write(lambda: ohlcv_df.write_parquet(parquet_path))
parquet_size = parquet_path.stat().st_size
results.append(BenchmarkResult("Parquet", "write", write_time, parquet_size, total_rows))
def read_parquet_materialized() -> pl.DataFrame:
return force_materialize_polars(pl.read_parquet(parquet_path))
read_time, parquet_result = time_read(read_parquet_materialized)
validate_result(parquet_result, total_rows, "Parquet read")
results.append(BenchmarkResult("Parquet", "read", read_time, parquet_size, total_rows))
def read_parquet_columnar() -> pl.DataFrame:
return force_materialize_polars(pl.read_parquet(parquet_path, columns=["close", "volume"]))
columnar_time, _ = time_read(read_parquet_columnar)
results.append(BenchmarkResult("Parquet", "columnar_read", columnar_time, parquet_size, total_rows))
```
## 4. Feather (Arrow IPC) — Zero-Copy Interchange
Feather opens the file by memory-mapping it; the bare `read_ipc` call returns
almost instantly because no bytes have been read yet. We capture both the
raw open time and the time to actually materialize the columns into memory.
Only the materialized number is comparable across formats.
```python
feather_path = BENCHMARK_DIR / f"ohlcv_{ACTIVE_SCALE.lower()}.feather"
write_time, _ = time_write(lambda: ohlcv_df.write_ipc(feather_path))
feather_size = feather_path.stat().st_size
results.append(BenchmarkResult("Feather", "write", write_time, feather_size, total_rows))
gc.collect()
start = time.perf_counter()
_ = pl.read_ipc(feather_path) # raw handle — memory-mapped, not materialized
raw_handle_time = time.perf_counter() - start
def read_feather_materialized() -> pl.DataFrame:
return force_materialize_polars(pl.read_ipc(feather_path))
read_time, feather_result = time_read(read_feather_materialized)
validate_result(feather_result, total_rows, "Feather read")
results.append(BenchmarkResult("Feather", "read", read_time, feather_size, total_rows))
def read_feather_columnar() -> pl.DataFrame:
return force_materialize_polars(pl.read_ipc(feather_path, columns=["close", "volume"]))
columnar_time, _ = time_read(read_feather_columnar)
results.append(BenchmarkResult("Feather", "columnar_read", columnar_time, feather_size, total_rows))
```
## 5. HDF5 — Legacy Scientific Container
HDF5 keeps a foothold in research codebases that predate Parquet. The
`fixed` format used by `pandas.HDFStore` doesn't support column projection,
so we record the columnar read as the same as the full read for fairness.
```python
hdf5_path = BENCHMARK_DIR / f"ohlcv_{ACTIVE_SCALE.lower()}.h5"
def write_hdf5() -> None:
with pd.HDFStore(hdf5_path, mode="w") as store:
store["ohlcv"] = ohlcv_pandas
write_time, _ = time_write(write_hdf5)
hdf5_size = hdf5_path.stat().st_size
results.append(BenchmarkResult("HDF5", "write", write_time, hdf5_size, total_rows))
def read_hdf5_materialized() -> pd.DataFrame:
with pd.HDFStore(hdf5_path, mode="r") as store:
df = store["ohlcv"]
return force_materialize_pandas(df)
read_time, hdf5_result = time_read(read_hdf5_materialized)
validate_result(hdf5_result, total_rows, "HDF5 read")
results.append(BenchmarkResult("HDF5", "read", read_time, hdf5_size, total_rows))
# Fixed-format HDF5 has no column projection — record the full-read time
# so the comparison plot still has a value for the format.
results.append(BenchmarkResult("HDF5", "columnar_read", read_time, hdf5_size, total_rows))
```
## 6. Results Summary
```python
results_df = pl.DataFrame(
[
{
"format": r.name,
"operation": r.operation,
"time_s": r.time_seconds,
"size_mb": r.size_bytes / 1e6,
"throughput_M_rows_s": r.rows_per_second / 1e6,
}
for r in results
]
)
```
```python
write_summary = (
results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "write")
.select(["format", "time_s", "size_mb", "throughput_M_rows_s"])
.sort("time_s")
)
write_summary
```
```python
read_summary = (
results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "read")
.select(["format", "time_s", "throughput_M_rows_s"])
.sort("time_s")
)
read_summary
```
```python
columnar_summary = (
results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "columnar_read")
.select(["format", "time_s", "throughput_M_rows_s"])
.sort("time_s")
)
columnar_summary
```
```python
full_read = results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "read").select(["format", "time_s"])
col_read = (
results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "columnar_read")
.select(["format", "time_s"])
.rename({"time_s": "columnar_time_s"})
)
projection_speedup = (
full_read.join(col_read, on="format")
.with_columns(speedup=pl.col("time_s") / pl.col("columnar_time_s"))
.select(["format", "time_s", "columnar_time_s", "speedup"])
.sort("speedup", descending=True)
)
projection_speedup
```
Memory-mapped reads still need to be materialized before they're useful;
the raw `read_ipc` handle time below is excluded from the comparison and
listed only so the gap to the materialized Feather read is visible.
```python
print(f"Feather raw handle (memory-mapped, not materialized): {raw_handle_time:.4f} s")
```
## 7. Visualisation
```python
fig = make_subplots(
rows=1,
cols=3,
subplot_titles=["Read", "Write", "Size"],
horizontal_spacing=0.12,
)
read_data = results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "read").sort("time_s")
write_data = results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "write").sort("time_s")
size_data = results_df.filter(pl.col("operation") == "write").sort("size_mb")
fig.add_trace(
go.Bar(
y=read_data["format"].to_list(),
x=read_data["time_s"].to_list(),
orientation="h",
marker_color=COLORS["blue"],
text=[f"{t:.3f}s" for t in read_data["time_s"].to_list()],
textposition="outside",
cliponaxis=False,
),
row=1,
col=1,
)
fig.add_trace(
go.Bar(
y=write_data["format"].to_list(),
x=write_data["time_s"].to_list(),
orientation="h",
marker_color=COLORS["amber"],
text=[f"{t:.3f}s" for t in write_data["time_s"].to_list()],
textposition="outside",
cliponaxis=False,
),
row=1,
col=2,
)
fig.add_trace(
go.Bar(
y=size_data["format"].to_list(),
x=size_data["size_mb"].to_list(),
orientation="h",
marker_color=COLORS["slate"],
text=[f"{s:.1f} MB" for s in size_data["size_mb"].to_list()],
textposition="outside",
cliponaxis=False,
),
row=1,
col=3,
)
fig.update_xaxes(title_text="Seconds (log)", row=1, col=1, type="log")
fig.update_xaxes(title_text="Seconds (log)", row=1, col=2, type="log")
fig.update_xaxes(title_text="MB", row=1, col=3)
_scale_word = {"S": "Small", "M": "Medium", "L": "Large"}.get(ACTIVE_SCALE, ACTIVE_SCALE)
print(f"Benchmark panel: {_scale_word} scale, {total_rows:,} rows")
fig.update_layout(
title_text="Read time, write time and file size by format",
height=400,
showlegend=False,
paper_bgcolor=COLORS["bg_light"],
plot_bgcolor=COLORS["bg_light"],
# Wider right margin so 'XX.X MB' / 'X.XXs' value labels don't crop.
margin=dict(l=60, r=80, t=70, b=50),
)
show_plotly_with_alt(
fig,
"Three horizontal-bar panels, one per format in each. The left and middle plot read and "
"write time on logarithmic axes, each bar labelled with its time in seconds and the "
"bars sorted shortest at the bottom. The right plots file size in megabytes on a linear "
"axis, each bar labelled and sorted the same way. The ordering of the formats differs "
"between the three panels.",
)
```
## Key Takeaways
- **Memory-mapping is not a read.** A raw Feather handle returns almost immediately
because nothing has been touched yet; the cost arrives when a page is first accessed.
The materialized read is the comparison that puts all four formats on one footing, and
it is the one plotted above.
- **No format wins all three panels.** The fastest to read, the fastest to write and the
smallest on disk are not the same format, so the choice is a trade rather than a
ranking, and which axis binds depends on whether the panel is written once and read
constantly or moved across a network.
- **Column projection is what makes the columnar formats fast, and CSV cannot have it.**
Reading a couple of columns instead of the whole schema costs roughly in proportion to
the columns asked for on Parquet and Feather. CSV barely benefits, because reaching a
later field on a row means parsing every field before it.
- **Compression shrinks the file, not the frame.** Parquet writes the panel at a fraction
of the CSV size, and the in-memory footprint after read-back is identical, because both
land in the same Arrow buffers. A format choice is a decision about disk and network,
and it does not change what the data costs once it is loaded.
- **HDF5 fixed format is single-shot.** It can read or write the entire
panel but offers no column projection.
### Format Picks
- **Long-term storage, cloud, cross-language**: Parquet.
- **Local interchange between Python tools**: Feather.
- **Legacy scientific Python pipelines that need append**: HDF5.
- **Human inspection or small exports**: CSV.
### Cross-References
- **Database engines** for the same panel: `21_storage_benchmark_database`.
- **Daily data lifecycle on Parquet**: `19_incremental_updates`.
- **Library-level storage primitives**: `18_data_management`.
```python
_results_csv = save_benchmark_results(results, "formats")
```
出典を明記したうえで、ライセンスに従って全文を掲載しています。 ライセンス: MIT
この要約は原文をもとにStratmillのリサーチエージェントが作成したもので、出典の複製ではありません。