明示的なコスト構成によるグロスからネットへの成績推定
コード Machine Learning for Trading
サマリー
このノートブックでは、取引、資金調達、ファンド経費を明示的に仮定し、グロスリターンをネット成績に換算します。コストにはスプレッドと市場インパクト、手数料と取引所費用、証拠金金利、株式借入料、運用報酬、管理費が含まれます。パラメーター化した計算では、実際の日次ETFリターン系列に、回転率の高いロングのみ、レバレッジをかけたロング・ショートのスプレッド、回転率の低いロングのみの各設定を適用します。そのうえで、グロスとネットのリターン、シャープレシオ、ドローダウンを比較します。
固定した仮定のもとで、回転率、レバレッジ、ショートへのエクスポージャーがコストの構成をどう変えるかを示します。取引による損失は回転率とともに増え、レバレッジをかけたショートポジションでは資金調達費用が特に重要になる可能性があります。リスク入力の変化に伴うポートフォリオ維持のための取引回転も、コストの発生源として扱います。これらは説明用のシナリオであり、実運用可能な戦略のバックテスト推定値ではありません。ETFのリターン経路には過去データを使いますが、回転率、レバレッジ、ショートの設定は仮定であり、コストは較正済みの執行モデルではなく簡略化したパラメーター入力です。そのため、結果は選んだコスト構成に依存し、アルファや将来のネット成績を立証しません。
主なアイデア
- 投資家が得るネットリターンを把握するには、グロスリターンから取引費用、資金調達費用、ファンド経費を差し引く必要があります。
- 回転率は取引コストを左右し、レバレッジとショートへのエクスポージャーは資金調達費用や借入料を加えます。
- 異なるETFリターン経路に共通のコスト構成を適用すると、設定の仮定がネット指標に与える影響を切り分けやすくなります。
- ネットのシャープレシオとドローダウンは、グロス成績から推測せず、コスト控除後に再計算する必要があります。
- これらのシナリオは説明用の計算であり、設定した戦略が実運用可能であることを示す証拠ではありません。
タグ
全文
# 10_gross_vs_net_performance.py
```py
# ---
# jupyter:
# jupytext:
# cell_metadata_filter: tags,-all
# text_representation:
# extension: .py
# format_name: percent
# format_version: '1.3'
# jupytext_version: 1.19.3
# kernelspec:
# display_name: Python 3 (ipykernel)
# language: python
# name: python3
# ---
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# # Gross vs Net Performance Analysis
#
# **Docker image**: `ml4t`
#
# This notebook provides a descriptive framework for analyzing the gap between gross
# (theoretical) and net performance under explicit scenario costs.
#
# **Key Learning Objectives:**
# - Understand the full cost stack from gross to net
# - Apply parameterized costs to return-series scenarios
# - Compute net Sharpe under a parameterised cost stack
# - Compare three archetypes driven by real ETF return series under a common cost stack
#
# **Book Reference:** Chapter 18: Section 18.8 (Designing practical cost guardrails)
#
# **Prerequisites:** Read [`01_cost_taxonomy`](01_cost_taxonomy.ipynb) for the cost stack and
# [`09_frequency_tradeoff`](09_frequency_tradeoff.ipynb) for turnover-driven breakeven logic.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 1. Setup
# %% tags=[]
"""Gross vs Net Performance - descriptive cost-stack scenario arithmetic."""
from dataclasses import dataclass
import numpy as np
import plotly.graph_objects as go
import polars as pl
from plotly.subplots import make_subplots
from data import load_etfs
from utils.reproducibility import set_global_seeds
from utils.style import COLORS, ml4t_palette, show_plotly_with_alt
# %% tags=["parameters"]
# No heavy computation - runs in seconds. Retained for Papermill compatibility.
SEED = 42
# The three archetypes are driven by real daily ETF return series; only the
# turnover/leverage/short configuration differs between them.
GROSS_START_DATE = "2021-01-01"
GROSS_END_DATE = "2023-12-31"
# %% tags=[]
set_global_seeds(SEED)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 2. The Cost Stack
#
# Converting gross to net involves multiple layers:
#
# ```
# Gross Strategy Return
# - Bid-Ask Spread Costs
# - Market Impact Costs
# = Trading P&L
# - Commission/Fees
# - Financing Costs (margin interest, borrow costs)
# = Net Trading P&L
# - Fund Expenses (mgmt fee, admin)
# = Investor Net Return
# ```
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### CostStack dataclass: fields
#
# The dataclass groups trading, financing, and fund-expense parameters so a
# single instance carries the full set of frictions used throughout the
# notebook.
# %% tags=[]
@dataclass
class CostStack:
spread_cost_bps: float = 2.0
impact_cost_bps: float = 5.0
commission_bps: float = 1.0
exchange_fee_bps: float = 0.5
margin_rate_annual: float = 0.05
borrow_rate_annual: float = 0.01
management_fee_annual: float = 0.02
admin_fee_annual: float = 0.002
def trading_cost_per_trade(self, trade_size_pct: float = 0.1) -> float:
scaled_impact = self.impact_cost_bps * np.sqrt(trade_size_pct / 0.1)
return self.spread_cost_bps + scaled_impact
def annual_trading_cost(self, annual_turnover: float) -> float:
cost_bps = self.trading_cost_per_trade()
commission_bps = self.commission_bps + self.exchange_fee_bps
total_bps = cost_bps + commission_bps
return annual_turnover * 2 * (total_bps / 10000)
def annual_financing_cost(
self,
gross_leverage: float = 1.0,
short_pct: float = 0.0,
) -> float:
margin_cost = max(0, gross_leverage - 1) * self.margin_rate_annual
# ``short_pct`` is the short notional as a fraction of gross exposure.
short_notional = gross_leverage * short_pct
borrow_cost = short_notional * self.borrow_rate_annual
return margin_cost + borrow_cost
def annual_expense_cost(self) -> float:
return self.management_fee_annual + self.admin_fee_annual
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Default cost stack instance
# %% tags=[]
# Default cost stack
costs = CostStack()
print("Cost Stack Summary:")
print(f" Trading cost (per trade): {costs.trading_cost_per_trade():.1f} bps")
print(f" Commission + fees: {costs.commission_bps + costs.exchange_fee_bps:.1f} bps")
print(f" Margin interest: {costs.margin_rate_annual:.1%} p.a.")
print(f" Short borrow cost: {costs.borrow_rate_annual:.1%} p.a.")
print(f" Management fee: {costs.management_fee_annual:.1%} p.a.")
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 3. Real Return Series and Strategy Configurations
#
# **Scope**: this section drives three strategy *configurations*: a high-turnover
# ETF profile, a leveraged long-short profile, and a low-turnover profile. Each uses
# **real daily ETF return series**, then varies turnover and leverage while holding
# the cost stack fixed to read off how the stack transforms gross into net.
# The gross return series are real (QQQ, a dollar-neutral QQQ-IWM spread, and SPY);
# turnover and leverage are configuration choices, not return-generating assumptions.
# A full real-data ETF momentum backtest is outside this descriptive cost exercise.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Load Real ETF Return Series
# %% tags=[]
_panel = load_etfs(
symbols=["SPY", "QQQ", "IWM"], start_date=GROSS_START_DATE, end_date=GROSS_END_DATE
)
_wide = (
_panel.sort("symbol", "timestamp")
.with_columns(r=pl.col("close").pct_change().over("symbol"))
.pivot(values="r", index="timestamp", on="symbol")
.sort("timestamp")
.drop_nulls()
)
spy_ret = _wide["SPY"].to_numpy()
qqq_ret = _wide["QQQ"].to_numpy()
iwm_ret = _wide["IWM"].to_numpy()
ls_ret = qqq_ret - iwm_ret # dollar-neutral long QQQ / short IWM spread
print(
f"Loaded {_wide.height} daily returns ({GROSS_START_DATE}..{GROSS_END_DATE}) for SPY, QQQ, IWM"
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Strategy Builder
#
# Wraps a real gross-return series with a turnover/leverage/short configuration.
# Turnover is the per-day one-way turnover implied by the annual figure.
# %% tags=[]
def build_strategy(
gross_returns: np.ndarray,
annual_turnover: float,
gross_leverage: float = 1.0,
short_pct: float = 0.0,
name: str = "Strategy",
) -> dict:
"""Pair a real return series with a turnover/leverage configuration."""
daily_turnover = annual_turnover / 252
return {
"name": name,
"gross_returns": gross_returns,
"turnover": np.full(len(gross_returns), daily_turnover),
"annual_turnover": annual_turnover,
"gross_leverage": gross_leverage,
"short_pct": short_pct,
}
# %% tags=[]
# Three descriptive configurations spanning turnover and leverage extremes, each on a real series.
# High-turnover ETF configuration: QQQ, long-only, no leverage, 24x annual turnover.
high_turnover_etf = build_strategy(
qqq_ret,
annual_turnover=24.0, # 2400% annual
gross_leverage=1.0,
short_pct=0.0,
name="High Turnover ETF (24x, Long-Only)",
)
# Leveraged long-short scenario: QQQ-IWM spread, 200% gross, 50% of gross short
# exposure (100% of NAV short), and 6x turnover.
long_short = build_strategy(
ls_ret,
annual_turnover=6.0, # 600% annual
gross_leverage=2.0, # 200% gross
short_pct=0.5,
name="Leveraged Long-Short (6x, 2x Gross)",
)
# Low-turnover ETF configuration: SPY, long-only, no leverage, 1x annual turnover.
value_strategy = build_strategy(
spy_ret,
annual_turnover=1.0, # 100% annual
gross_leverage=1.0,
short_pct=0.0,
name="Low Turnover (1x, Long-Only)",
)
strategies = [high_turnover_etf, long_short, value_strategy]
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 4. Apply Costs and Compute Net Returns
# %% tags=[]
def apply_cost_stack(
strategy: dict,
costs: CostStack,
) -> dict:
"""Apply full cost stack to get net returns."""
gross_returns = strategy["gross_returns"]
turnover = strategy["turnover"]
# Daily trading costs
trading_cost_bps = costs.trading_cost_per_trade()
commission_bps = costs.commission_bps + costs.exchange_fee_bps
daily_trading_cost = turnover * 2 * ((trading_cost_bps + commission_bps) / 10000)
# Daily financing costs
financing_annual = costs.annual_financing_cost(
strategy["gross_leverage"], strategy["short_pct"]
)
daily_financing = financing_annual / 252
# Daily fund expenses
expense_annual = costs.annual_expense_cost()
daily_expense = expense_annual / 252
# Net returns
net_returns = gross_returns - daily_trading_cost - daily_financing - daily_expense
return {
**strategy,
"net_returns": net_returns,
"trading_cost": daily_trading_cost,
"financing_cost": np.full_like(gross_returns, daily_financing),
"expense_cost": np.full_like(gross_returns, daily_expense),
}
# Apply costs
for i, strat in enumerate(strategies):
strategies[i] = apply_cost_stack(strat, costs)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 5. Performance Comparison
# %% tags=[]
def compute_performance(returns: np.ndarray) -> dict:
"""Compute performance metrics."""
ann_return = np.mean(returns) * 252
ann_vol = np.std(returns, ddof=1) * np.sqrt(252)
sharpe = ann_return / ann_vol if ann_vol > 0 else 0
cumulative = np.cumprod(1 + returns)
rolling_max = np.maximum.accumulate(cumulative)
drawdown = (cumulative - rolling_max) / rolling_max
max_dd = drawdown.min()
return {
"Annual Return": ann_return,
"Annual Vol": ann_vol,
"Sharpe Ratio": sharpe,
"Max Drawdown": max_dd,
}
# %% tags=[]
# Compute summary rows for the chart annotations and downstream checks.
comparison_rows = []
for strat in strategies:
gross_perf = compute_performance(strat["gross_returns"])
net_perf = compute_performance(strat["net_returns"])
drag = gross_perf["Annual Return"] - net_perf["Annual Return"]
comparison_rows.append(
{
"Configuration": strat["name"],
"Turnover (x)": strat["annual_turnover"],
"Gross SR": round(gross_perf["Sharpe Ratio"], 2),
"Net SR": round(net_perf["Sharpe Ratio"], 2),
"Cost Drag (%)": round(drag * 100, 1),
}
)
for row in comparison_rows:
print(
f"{row['Configuration']}: gross SR {row['Gross SR']:.2f} -> "
f"net SR {row['Net SR']:.2f}; cost drag {row['Cost Drag (%)']:.1f}%"
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Reading**: the computed summary rows show how the same illustrative cost stack
# changes three real ETF return series under different turnover and leverage configurations.
# These are descriptive full-sample scenarios, not realized strategy estimates.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 6. Equity Curve Comparison
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Build cumulative equity series
# %% tags=[]
equity_series = [
{
"name": strat["name"],
"cum_gross": np.cumprod(1 + strat["gross_returns"]),
"cum_net": np.cumprod(1 + strat["net_returns"]),
"timestamp": _wide["timestamp"].to_list(),
}
for strat in strategies
]
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Stacked subplot of gross vs net equity curves
# %% tags=[]
fig = make_subplots(
rows=len(strategies),
cols=1,
subplot_titles=[s["name"] for s in equity_series],
shared_xaxes=True,
shared_yaxes=True,
)
for i, eq in enumerate(equity_series):
fig.add_trace(
go.Scatter(
x=eq["timestamp"],
y=eq["cum_gross"],
mode="lines",
name="Gross",
line=dict(color=COLORS["blue"], dash="dash"),
showlegend=(i == 0),
),
row=i + 1,
col=1,
)
fig.add_trace(
go.Scatter(
x=eq["timestamp"],
y=eq["cum_net"],
mode="lines",
name="Net",
line=dict(color=COLORS["amber"]),
showlegend=(i == 0),
),
row=i + 1,
col=1,
)
fig.update_layout(
title="Gross and net cumulative wealth, three strategy profiles",
height=200 * len(equity_series) + 100,
)
fig.update_xaxes(title_text="Calendar date")
fig.update_yaxes(title_text="Cumulative wealth (start = 1.0)")
show_plotly_with_alt(
fig,
"Three stacked panels of cumulative wealth against calendar date, one per strategy profile, "
"each carrying a dashed gross line and a solid net line from a common starting value. In "
"every panel the two lines begin together and the net line falls progressively further "
"below the gross one. The gap is widest in the leveraged long-short panel, where the net "
"line ends near where it started while the gross line ends well above it, and narrowest in "
"the low-turnover panel, where the two stay close throughout.",
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Interpretation**: The equity curves make cost drag path-dependent rather than
# abstract. Small daily deductions compound into visibly different wealth paths,
# especially for the highest-turnover strategy.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 7. Cost Attribution
# %% tags=[]
# Cost breakdown for each strategy.
cost_breakdown = []
for strat in strategies:
# Annual costs
trading_annual = np.mean(strat["trading_cost"]) * 252
financing_annual = np.mean(strat["financing_cost"]) * 252
expense_annual = np.mean(strat["expense_cost"]) * 252
total_annual = trading_annual + financing_annual + expense_annual
cost_breakdown.append(
{
"Strategy": strat["name"],
"Trading Costs": trading_annual,
"Financing Costs": financing_annual,
"Fund Expenses": expense_annual,
"Total Costs": total_annual,
}
)
cost_df = pl.DataFrame(cost_breakdown)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Finding**: The computed attribution object separates execution drag from financing drag.
# That distinction matters because lowering turnover will not fix a strategy whose
# economics are dominated by leverage and borrow costs.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# The attribution object feeds the grouped chart below. No side-effect files are written.
# %% tags=[]
# Grouped bar chart
fig = go.Figure()
categories = ["Trading Costs", "Financing Costs", "Fund Expenses"]
colors = ml4t_palette(3, categorical=True)
for i, strat in enumerate(cost_breakdown):
fig.add_trace(
go.Bar(
name=strat["Strategy"],
x=categories,
y=[strat[c] for c in categories],
marker_color=colors[i],
)
)
fig.update_layout(
title="Annual cost by component and strategy profile",
yaxis_title="Annual cost (%)",
yaxis_tickformat=".1%",
barmode="group",
height=430,
)
show_plotly_with_alt(
fig,
"Grouped bars of annual cost by component, three profiles per component. Trading costs are "
"dominated by the high-turnover profile and are near zero for the low-turnover one. "
"Financing costs are borne entirely by the leveraged profile and are absent from the other "
"two. Fund expenses are the same height for all three.",
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Finding**: The grouped bars show that "cost" is not a single knob. Different
# strategy archetypes fail for different reasons, so the repair has to target the
# dominant source of drag rather than treat all frictions as interchangeable.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 8. Sensitivity Analysis: Costs vs Turnover
# %% tags=[]
# How does net Sharpe vary with turnover for different one-way cost levels?
turnovers = np.linspace(0.5, 30, 50)
one_way_cost_bps = [5, 10, 20, 40] # one-way trading cost in bps
sensitivity_data = []
for cost_bps in one_way_cost_bps:
for turnover in turnovers:
# Gross Sharpe of 1.5, 15% vol
gross_daily_ret = 1.5 * 0.15 / 252
# Both annual turnover and cost_bps are one-way; a round trip has two legs.
daily_cost = 2 * turnover / 252 * (cost_bps / 10000)
net_daily_ret = gross_daily_ret - daily_cost
net_sharpe = net_daily_ret * 252 / 0.15
sensitivity_data.append(
{
"Turnover": turnover,
"One-Way Cost (bps)": cost_bps,
"Net Sharpe": net_sharpe,
}
)
sens_df = pl.DataFrame(sensitivity_data)
# %% tags=[]
fig = go.Figure()
for cost_bps, cost_color in zip(
one_way_cost_bps, ml4t_palette(len(one_way_cost_bps), categorical=True), strict=True
):
subset = sens_df.filter(pl.col("One-Way Cost (bps)") == cost_bps)
fig.add_trace(
go.Scatter(
x=subset["Turnover"].to_list(),
y=subset["Net Sharpe"].to_list(),
mode="lines",
name=f"{cost_bps} bps one-way",
line=dict(color=cost_color),
)
)
fig.add_hline(y=0, line_dash="dash", line_color=COLORS["slate"])
fig.add_hline(
y=0.5,
line_dash="dot",
line_color=COLORS["neutral"],
annotation_text="Net SR = 0.5 reference",
annotation_position="top left",
)
fig.update_layout(
title="Net Sharpe against annual turnover, one line per one-way cost",
xaxis_title="Annual One-Way Turnover (x)",
yaxis_title="Net Sharpe Ratio",
height=450,
)
show_plotly_with_alt(
fig,
"Four straight lines of net Sharpe against annual turnover, one per one-way cost level, all "
"starting from the same point at zero turnover and fanning downward. The steepest line is "
"the most expensive one, and it is the only one to fall below the dotted reference and then "
"below zero inside the plotted turnover range.",
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Interpretation**: The sensitivity chart is the general policy rule behind the
# case studies. Each line plots Net Sharpe as a function of annual one-way
# turnover at a fixed one-way cost level. As per-trade one-way costs rise, the
# feasible turnover range contracts sharply even if the gross signal quality
# stays unchanged.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 9. Vector-L2 Turnover Diagnostic
#
# Standard turnover measures weight changes: $\sum_i |w_{i,t} - w_{i,t-1}|$.
# This diagnostic measures weight changes caused by the configured risk-input path;
# it does not identify alpha-signal turnover.
#
# A vector L2 turnover diagnostic measures the size of each weight-change vector.
#
# This is an illustrative vector norm, not a factor-portfolio matrix norm or an
# alpha-signal decomposition.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Set up the covariance-input scenario
#
# 20 assets, base covariance held fixed, only a small rotation of the first two
# axes each period to simulate regime drift. Minimum-variance weights respond to
# this risk-input change, creating a descriptive covariance-drift scenario.
# %% tags=[]
n_assets = 20
n_periods = 60
np.random.seed(SEED)
base_cov = np.random.randn(n_assets, n_assets)
base_cov = base_cov @ base_cov.T / n_assets + np.eye(n_assets) * 0.5
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Roll the min-var portfolio through the rotating covariance
# %% tags=[]
turnovers_fro = []
turnovers_l1 = []
prev_weights = np.ones(n_assets) / n_assets # start equal-weight
for t in range(n_periods):
angle = 0.05 * t
rotation = np.eye(n_assets)
rotation[0, 0] = np.cos(angle)
rotation[0, 1] = -np.sin(angle)
rotation[1, 0] = np.sin(angle)
rotation[1, 1] = np.cos(angle)
cov_t = rotation @ base_cov @ rotation.T
inv_cov = np.linalg.inv(cov_t)
w = inv_cov @ np.ones(n_assets)
w = w / w.sum()
delta = w - prev_weights
turnovers_fro.append(np.linalg.norm(delta))
turnovers_l1.append(np.sum(np.abs(delta)))
prev_weights = w
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ### Summarize covariance-drift maintenance turnover
# %% tags=[]
maintenance_l1 = np.asarray(turnovers_l1[1:])
maintenance_l2 = np.asarray(turnovers_fro[1:])
print("Covariance-Drift Maintenance Turnover (20-asset minimum-variance scenario)")
print(f" Mean one-way L1 turnover after construction: {0.5 * np.mean(maintenance_l1):.4f}")
print(f" Mean vector L2 turnover after construction: {np.mean(maintenance_l2):.4f}")
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Finding**: after excluding initial portfolio construction, this rotating-covariance
# scenario describes covariance-driven maintenance turnover. It is not an alpha-signal
# decomposition or a claim about a null portfolio.
# %% tags=[]
fig = go.Figure()
fig.add_scatter(
x=list(range(1, n_periods)),
y=turnovers_l1[1:],
mode="lines",
name="L1 turnover",
line_color=COLORS["blue"],
)
fig.add_scatter(
x=list(range(1, n_periods)),
y=turnovers_fro[1:],
mode="lines",
name="Vector L2 turnover",
line_color=COLORS["amber"],
)
fig.update_layout(
title="Minimum-variance weight change per rebalancing period",
xaxis_title="Rebalancing period",
yaxis_title="Weight change (L1 or vector L2)",
height=420,
)
show_plotly_with_alt(
fig,
"Two flat series of per-period weight change against rebalancing period. The L1 measure sits "
"roughly three times higher than the vector L2 measure across the whole range; both drift "
"slightly without trending, and the two never approach one another.",
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Finding**: covariance drift creates maintenance turnover under this fixed-rule
# scenario. The plotted L1 and vector-L2 paths use different norms and are not
# additive alpha-signal decompositions.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 10. Mechanism Summary
#
# Each item below restates a relationship between an input dial (turnover, leverage,
# expense ratio, covariance drift) and the cost-stack output. The gross return
# series are real ETF returns; the turnover and leverage are configuration choices,
# so the cost-drag numbers reflect those configurations applied to real returns.
#
# 1. **Trading drag scales with turnover**: the computed summary rows show the cost-stack
# effect of increasing the annual turnover configuration.
#
# 2. **Financing matters for leverage**: a leveraged long-short configuration pays
# margin interest and borrow on the short notional. Both are explicit assumptions.
#
# 3. **Fund expenses are a constant drag**: the configured management and admin
# assumptions apply regardless of gross return.
#
# 4. **Net Sharpe ordering reflects the full cost mix, not gross alone**: the
# computed rows recompute each configuration's gross and net metrics from the
# same return path and explicit cost assumptions.
#
# 5. **Covariance drift changes risk inputs**: the §9 scenario describes maintenance
# weight changes after construction under a rotating covariance matrix.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## 11. Net Sharpe by Configuration
# %% tags=[]
# Net Sharpe summary across the three parametric configurations.
print("\nNet Sharpe by Configuration:")
viability_rows = []
for strat in strategies:
gross_sr = compute_performance(strat["gross_returns"])["Sharpe Ratio"]
net_sr = compute_performance(strat["net_returns"])["Sharpe Ratio"]
if net_sr > 1.0:
net_sr_bucket = "Net SR > 1.0"
elif net_sr > 0.5:
net_sr_bucket = "Net SR in (0.5, 1.0]"
else:
net_sr_bucket = "Net SR <= 0.5"
viability_rows.append(
{
"Configuration": strat["name"],
"Gross SR": round(gross_sr, 2),
"Net SR": round(net_sr, 2),
"Net SR Bucket": net_sr_bucket,
}
)
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# **Mechanism**: the computed Net-Sharpe rows are binned by configuration into three
# Net-Sharpe ranges. The two bucket boundaries are set in the cell above and are presentation
# thresholds for grouping the demonstration outcomes, not a thumbs-up / thumbs-down
# judgment on whether any of these configurations would be deployable on real data.
# The point of these computed rows is to make the gross-to-net gap visible for each
# configuration of turnover and leverage.
#
# **Next**: See [`11_cost_cliff`](11_cost_cliff.ipynb) for the intraday version of this cost arithmetic and
# [`12_commission_slippage_comparison`](12_commission_slippage_comparison.ipynb) for explicit model-choice sensitivity.
# %% [markdown] tags=[]
# ## Key Takeaways
#
# - **The cost stack is layered**: gross-to-net translation is not a single
# "cost" deduction; trading frictions, financing, and fund expenses each
# answer to different design levers. Lowering turnover does not fix a
# leverage-driven cost problem.
# - **Financing dominates leveraged long-short**: under the default cost stack,
# the leveraged long-short configuration loses more Sharpe to margin and
# borrow than to trading frictions, while the high-turnover long-only loses
# most of its Sharpe to per-trade costs.
# - **Turnover sensitivity is linear under fixed assumptions**: the §8 surface
# shows net Sharpe declining linearly with turnover for each one-way cost level.
# - **Risk-input drift creates maintenance turnover**: the minimum-variance scenario
# changes weights as covariance rotates, but it provides no alpha-signal conclusion.
```出典を明記したうえで、ライセンスに従って全文を掲載しています。 ライセンス: MIT
この要約は原文をもとにStratmillのリサーチエージェントが作成したもので、出典の複製ではありません。