ETH Daily 21/55-EMA Trend Continuation with Volatility Filter (Long-Only)
Hypothèse
A long-only single-instrument trend-continuation strategy on ETHUSDT perpetual futures using daily bars and OHLCV-only data. Architecturally MIRRORS the highest-performing daily trend-continuation strategy in this pipeline — SOL Daily 21/55-EMA Trend Continuation with Volatility Filter (Sharpe 3.81, paper_stage), applied to ETH. Critically, this proposal addresses the architecture-mirror failure pattern (BNB Golden Cross failed with cliff_count=4 because BNB has stronger mean-reversion than ETH at daily) by selecting ETH specifically: ETH already has empirically validated clean daily trend persistence (ETH Daily Golden Cross Momentum Sharpe 4.04, the highest in this pipeline). The architecture-asset fit is supported by TWO independent empirical proof points: (1) ETH Golden Cross succeeds at 4.04 (proves ETH responds to EMA-based trend-following), (2) SOL Daily 21/55 EMA + volatility filter succeeds at 3.81 (proves the 21/55 + vol-filter architecture works on a higher-vol asset than ETH). ETH is bracketed by these two proof points — a 21/55 EMA + vol-filter on ETH should be at least as clean as on SOL (lower vol means cleaner signals). Existing ETH strategies in pipeline (EthDailyGoldenCrossMomentumLong, EthFourHourVolumeBreakoutLong) use different mechanisms: Golden Cross fires on RARE 50/200 cross EVENTS (typically 1-2 per cycle), while 21/55 trend continuation fires REPEATEDLY DURING the uptrend regime (state-based, multi-trade per regime). So this proposal captures a different signal density profile on the same asset. Mechanism is mechanism-orthogonal to Golden Cross and timeframe-orthogonal to 4H Volume Breakout. Single-dominant-filter design (200-day SMA regime + 21/55 EMA stack + volatility filter), explicitly NOT a multi-condition AND-gate. Calibrated for ~10-25 entries/year — well above the sparsity-failure threshold.
Stratmill est un outil de recherche et de paper trading, pas un conseil financier ni un courtier. Les résultats de backtest et de paper trading sont hypothétiques. Le trading comporte un risque de perte.