跳至正文
返回文库全部文档

智能体模型解释稳健的平方根市场冲击

文章 arXiv papers · 作者: Iacopo Mastromatteo et al.

总结

本文重新考察一种基于智能体的模型,该模型旨在解释大额母单的价格冲击为何会随交易量的平方根近似增长。模型假设,市场中有大量潜在流动性,并且随着价格扩散,这类流动性在当前价格附近减少。作者考察了对原始设定的批评;原始设定中,市价单承载知情交易行为,而限价单则以被动、随机的方式到达。作者还研究了限价单响应订单流,以及执行规则发生变化的模型变体。

在这些模型变体中,平方根冲击关系仍然稳健,表明这种关系可能由少数市场要素产生。研究还重新解释了先前报告的价格行为从超扩散转为亚扩散的变化,认为这是一个交叉过程,而非真正的相变。对模型稍作修改即可产生真正的相变。最后,作者从理论上解释了为何即使订单流偏差非常小,非线性冲击仍可能持续。这些发现基于模型;摘要未提供实证市场验证或量化表现估计。

核心观点

  • 模型将母单的平方根冲击与当前价格附近变稀的潜在流动性联系起来。
  • 作者测试了限价单行为和执行规则的变化。
  • 在所研究的模型变体中,平方根冲击定律仍然成立。
  • 原始模型中报告的超扩散向亚扩散的变化,被解释为交叉过程。
  • 修改后的模型能够产生真正的相变,以及在订单流偏差极小时仍存在的非线性冲击。

标签

全文
# Agent-based models for latent liquidity and concave price impact


# Agent-based models for latent liquidity and concave price impact









We revisit the "epsilon-intelligence" model of Toth et al.(2011), that was proposed as a minimal framework to understand the square-root dependence of the impact of meta-orders on volume in financial markets. The basic idea is that most of the daily liquidity is "latent" and furthermore vanishes linearly around the current price, as a consequence of the diffusion of the price itself. However, the numerical implementation of Toth et al. was criticised as being unrealistic, in particular because all the "intelligence" was conferred to market orders, while limit orders were passive and random. In this work, we study various alternative specifications of the model, for example allowing limit orders to react to the order flow, or changing the execution protocols. By and large, our study lends strong support to the idea that the square-root impact law is a very generic and robust property that requires very few ingredients to be valid. We also show that the transition from super-diffusion to sub-diffusion reported in Toth et al. is in fact a cross-over, but that the original model can be slightly altered in order to give rise to a genuine phase transition, which is of interest on its own. We finally propose a general theoretical framework to understand how a non-linear impact may appear even in the limit where the bias in the order flow is vanishingly small.

在遵守原作品许可的前提下,附作者信息全文展示。 许可协议: abstract CC0

此摘要由 Stratmill 研究智能体根据原文撰写,并非原文副本。